It's raining in Ghaza, so a lot of homeless and displaced people are gonna get wet, cold and sick now:
On the other hand, they didn't have access to water, so maybe they can collect and cook the rainwater now. Probably better than drinking the badly desalinated water they've been drinking all this time. In the above videos you even see people going out to shower in the rain because they haven't had a shower in weeks.
This is a CNN embed inspecting for himself the same Hamas tunnel that was shown in the video that the IDF released yesterday:
Daniel Hagari, the IDF spokesman, says that it's a 20 meter deep tunnel. Other Hamas tunnels are supposedly 70 meters deep, so we can't really blame the people in the hospital for not having noticed anything.
Hagari says that the IDF went down into the tunnel with a robot but came upon a door that opens to the direction of the children's cancer hospital, suggesting that the suspected hostage space there and the tunnel are connected:
Hagari takes the CNN reporter into the room underneath the hospital where the IDF supposedly found the explosives that were shown in their video yesterday (notice that stray cat running past the guns in the basement):
Hagari suspects that Al Shifa hospital isn't just used as a military base for Hamas, claiming there are likely hostages underneath that hospital:
Here's what I said in my previous post: Israel needs to go full OSINT with their findings to win the information war:
Later an analyst claims that the IDF are already physically inside the tunnels. I don't know how he knows this but we'll see.
This is a tent where the IDF have been collecting the weapons they found during their raids into Ghaza, weapons which are Russian, North Korean, Egyptian and home-made:
I find it very telling that, for years, Null was telling Kiwis to read the Unabomber's writings, but now that there's a war against a society that's literally based on the "Might is Right" violent terroristic principles of the Unabomber, Null is aggressively ignoring it. Null doesn't want to know or recon with the kind of society that is the actual result of the principles he advocates.
This guy still doesn't believe the video, LMAO:
He's legally edge-casing about "active versus passive human shields", but it's ridiculous to assume that civilians who are being threatened and blackmailed by Hamas would ever reveal themselves to be self-aware ie "active" human shields.
I looked up this Andreas Krieg guy, and he seems to be plainly biased in favour of Arabs:
Biography
Dr Andreas Krieg is a senior lecturer at the School of Security Studies at King’s College London, Royal College of Defence Studies and fellow at the Institute of Middle Eastern Studies. He has spent more than ten years living, studying and working across the MENA region. Andreas was able to complement his years in the Levant, i.e. Lebanon, Syria, Israel and Palestine, with four years in Qatar where he was involved in delivering a strategic contract between the State of Qatar, the UK Ministry of Defence and King’s College London.
In his research Andreas has focused on a variety of different subjects relating to the academic discipline of Security Studies in the geographic context of the MENA region. In particular, Andreas looks at violent non-state actors in the MENA region and their competition with state authority to provide communal resilience. In so doing, he has looked at assemblages between state and non-state actors across North Africa and the Levant in his work on surrogate warfare, and at the nexus between security provision and socio-politics in the Arab world in his work on the Arab Spring. From his research on the Gulf Divide, sprung the idea of his current project looking at the internal and external weaponization of narratives in the Middle East, which has not only distorted civil-societal discourse in the region but also the academic debate on where the region is going.
...
More recently, Andreas has explored the nexus between security and socio-politics in the Middle East after the Arab Spring. He has just completed a monograph on surrogate warfare analyzing new security assemblages between state and non-state actors in 21st century security provision. In particular, this monograph is a first attempt to conceptualize the wide-ranging externalization of the burden of warfare from state to non-state actors in recent decades.
His bio mentions the Arab Spring, so could it be that he's going soft on Hamas because he was involved with the Arab Spring, which we know was ultimately about Western-orchestrated regime change in the ME... but he's still mad that the Arab Spring was a failure? We know that the ME doesn't want democracy, we know they prefer to be theocratic oppressive violence-driven terror-states... so perhaps his job is to continue to pull the wool over everyone's eyes about "what the ME really wants"? We know what they really want, we saw it on Oct 7th.
Just as I suspected, he's an Al Jazeera regular:
IDF posts the receipts of a tunnel close to a hospital, and of Hamas operating in the basement of a children's cancer hospital (you will never see this on Al Jazeera):
