A proud, independent and vibrant splinter of the Kiwifarms community. All races, ethnicities, religions, gay/straight, CIS/trans, neurodiversity affirmative. If you can rock with us: You are one of us.
Please note: Positions or opinions expressed are personal and don't reflect official stances by Onionfarms.

Find member

Kiwifarms Gossip & Slap Fights KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
ITT: Onion farms makes Kiwifarms cry and we drink the tears in a coffee mug. And occasionally tell Ashley to fuck off.
Wasteland Scholar said:
You don't understand! It is only okay for women that Daniel lusts over to do that while women he hates who engage in that same behavior are vile whores who need to be destroyed.
Click to expand...
I've never lusted over any e-girl except you BB Grill. You're my one+only and I will fuck that foot pussy 🤤
And like I said, you're not a whore because you're very loyal to your Rabbit™ vibrator
Wasteland Scholar said:
Women are either vile whores or saintly Madonna's in Daniel's mind.
Click to expand...
That's a lot of weird projection based on nothing lol. I don't even typically call women I dislike whores since it's usually the personality I find objectionable, not their number of partners. Wimminz are people. Some are chill, some are shitty. You fall into the latter category, which is why I need you in my life 🥵
 
odd 1.png
odd 2.png
Debate former KF user Odd Opossum on whether he should have been banned for calling Null a "whiny edgelord who never grew up".
 
Petersburg said:
What is the lore with Odd Opossum?
Click to expand...
He was a poster on KF for over a year and made a lot of other posters on there mad by making fun of them and/or calling them losers. Highlights include two Woman-Hate thread users threatening to spitroast him together, everything with Toolbox that I've already posted, the time he was accused of being a pedophile for saying he didn't care about neets and started getting lynching threats, and more. He got banned in July, for what was more than likely upsetting Null by saying his "I want to start a family" thread should be mocked.
 
The Washington Ogre said:
Any of the people that aren't minors obsessed with pedocrusading probably have worse skeletons in their closet and their shame is what drives their inquisitions. Pedophiles deserve the death penalty. People obsessed with every shadow they see being a pedophile are more afraid of their own dark impulses.
Click to expand...
The recent surge in online posts calling for 'death to all pedos' has reached a fever pitch, and I'm starting to suspect that this rhetoric is more about mob mentality than genuine outrage. Don't get me wrong - there's no question that individuals who harm children deserve severe punishment. However, the conversation has started to take on a hysterical tone. I came across a thread about a guy who was arrested for creating AI-generated child abuse material, and the usual suspects were quick to demand the usual wood chippers. Meanwhile, a few rational voices pointed out that this case highlights the complexities of AI laws and the need for nuanced discussion.

The problem is, these rational voices are being drowned out by the online mob. Instead of having a thoughtful conversation about how AI laws are struggling to keep pace with technology, we're seeing people scream over each other digitally. This kind of discourse is not only unproductive, but it's also harmful. If you dare to suggest that maybe we should approach this issue with a bit more nuance, you'll be dogpiled by people who assume you're defending the indefensible.

I think this phenomenon is a symptom of a broader problem: kiwi farms users has become increasingly polarized and hostile.
 
Ishtar said:
The zoomers
Click to expand...
Most of them weren't old enough to be online prior to its sanitation so to them, it's always been some safe space because they were only ever on core sites filled with aggressive moderation and relative normies.
kiwifails said:
you'll be dogpiled by people who assume you're defending the indefensible.
Click to expand...
They have no concept of victims being a necessity for a crime to have been committed. They have the perpetual mindset that something existing they don't like makes them the victim. In their mind they are always a victim to whatever this week's Scooby Doo villain is no matter how little it actually affects them. Its existence is a crime against them.
 
Ishtar said:
That was some serious fucking cringe. Has he ever heard of a journal?

I wish I had screenshotted the replies when I asked what kris tyson did and why I was supposed to care. Nobody tried actually answering me, they were just threatening to kill me and trying to figure out where I lived. It was the craziest shit I'd ever seen on there. I think half the reason josh deleted those posts is because he's embarrassed how easy his userbase is to troll.
This is a good example of the virtue signalling going on there now.
View attachment 63010
Click to expand...
I tried reading through the thread, but it was just post after post of the same stuff. I'm still not entirely sure what happened, except that the guy was caught online sexting with an underage person or something. But that's about all I got out of it, because like I said, it's hard to have a discussion like this without people going off the deep end. It's just frustrating, you know? You can't even have a conversation about this stuff without people acting like they're on some kind of moral crusade. I'm not asking for anyone to make excuses or anything, I just wish people could calm down and talk about it like adults.
 
kiwifails said:
The recent surge in online posts calling for 'death to all pedos' has reached a fever pitch, and I'm starting to suspect that this rhetoric is more about mob mentality than genuine outrage. Don't get me wrong - there's no question that individuals who harm children deserve severe punishment. However, the conversation has started to take on a hysterical tone. I came across a thread about a guy who was arrested for creating AI-generated child abuse material, and the usual suspects were quick to demand the usual wood chippers. Meanwhile, a few rational voices pointed out that this case highlights the complexities of AI laws and the need for nuanced discussion.

The problem is, these rational voices are being drowned out by the online mob. Instead of having a thoughtful conversation about how AI laws are struggling to keep pace with technology, we're seeing people scream over each other digitally. This kind of discourse is not only unproductive, but it's also harmful. If you dare to suggest that maybe we should approach this issue with a bit more nuance, you'll be dogpiled by people who assume you're defending the indefensible.

I think this phenomenon is a symptom of a broader problem: kiwi farms users has become increasingly polarized and hostile.
Click to expand...
@Null keeps banning all the rational people, or they leave of their own accord. I wouldn't go back if he begged. I'd be better off starting a new kiwisplinter than giving that fat faggot's site any more of my time.

The retards are all signalling the trendy virtue. They did the same when it was trendy to call for total tranny death.
 
The Washington Ogre said:
Most of them weren't old enough to be online prior to its sanitation so to them, it's always been some safe space because they were only ever on core sites filled with aggressive moderation and relative normies.

They have no concept of victims being a necessity for a crime to have been committed. They have the perpetual mindset that something existing they don't like makes them the victim. In their mind they are always a victim to whatever this week's Scooby Doo villain is no matter how little it actually affects them. Its existence is a crime against them.
Click to expand...
The thing is, they don't seem to get that their offense isn't a valid reason for something to not exist. Whether or not someone's a victim, the concept itself bothers them, and they find it objectionable. It's the same mentality that leads to self-censoring, where people avoid certain words or topics because they might offend someone. The reality is, they're not mad because someone's been hurt; they're mad because they believe anything that offends them shouldn't be allowed.
 
Gargamel said:
@Null keeps banning all the rational people, or they leave of their own accord. I wouldn't go back if he begged. I'd be better off starting a new kiwisplinter than giving that fat faggot's site any more of my time.

The retards are all signalling the trendy virtue. They did the same when it was trendy to call for total tranny death.
Click to expand...
It's as though they have become the very thing they claim to despise. Moral hypocrites, pontificating on the pointless, each one trying to outdo the others in their own piousness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom