What is Null's policy on KiwiFarms users cross-posting porn and other types of obscenity under the guise of "fair use criticism"? Are Null and his users
"porno-laundering" under the guise of promoting an anti-LGBT agenda? A detailed analysis showing the receipts (Null in his own words).
Let's look at these questions:
-What is "porno-laundering"? (aka the "porn stops being porn when it's crossposted to KF" argument)
-What did Null have to say about people using KiwiFarms for "porno-laundering"? (Null will actually ban users if he suspects porno-laundering!)
-Was Null instructing his users to add written criticism to porn uploads, as a pretext for "porno-laundering"?
-What's Null's policy on users cross-posting porn on KF to deny porn actors an income? (the "whores get nothing" argument)
- Null will remove users uploading .zips of pirated games deliberately onto KF to deny game devs an income... but not pirated porn?
I personally believe that Null was knowingly violating Epik's ToS barring obscenity, and I believe he was hoping to get away with it based on his previous backroom deal with Brian Royce. This is just my personal opinion based on what I have seen so far.
I was listening to this Livestream, and at this part the two people talking mention SRS or bottom surgery results being unrealistic. They recommend to their viewers that they visit the Stinkditch thread on KiwiFarms, which is basically the KF equivalent of the old /r/NeovaginaDisasters thread on Reddit:
Is Null going to deny that this thread exists on KF and that this thread would constitute a violation of Epik's ToS clause against any kind of obscenity? Or is he going to edge-case about this and say that "we are posting images of medical malpractice to denounce trans butchery, not to show REAL vaginas". Does that matter to the coomers who browse the farms looking exactly for this type of material?
Also, with the proliferation of "trans teens" having surgery at younger and younger ages (some even having their dicks cut off at 16, like Jazz Jennings)... how does Null and the TERFs who frequent the Stinkditch thread know that the examples of /r/NeovaginaDisasters posted in their thread aren't pictures of actual "trans teens" who had their genitals mangled? Or do they think that they, as adults, get to oogle at a legal minor's destroyed genitals, just because they're doing it in the name of their Righteous Quest of exposing the evil LGBT?
Null's argument is that he and his users should be allowed to cross-post porn - especially LGBT porn - to KF because they are not presenting these people in the original context, ie, as "pornographic" - as sexy and desirable - but rather in the new context of KF, where they are presented as monstrous, degenerate, disgusting, predatory and contemptible. Since everyone on KF either shares or is expected to share Null's anti-LGBT agenda, this is how those images are going to be read in their new context on KF. This is what I refer to as the "porn stops being porn when it's cross-posted to KF" argument.
I would also argue that this argument is complete bullshit because:
1) Null has no idea who is browsing his forum and for what purpose (Null cannot logically assume that everyone on KF shares his anti-LGBT agenda or is browsing the forum in that spirit)
2) Null himself let the degenerate predators of 16chan.nl's /phile board know that they were welcome on KF, when he openly stated he was pondering creating a new "pedophile containment" thread on KF. Thus Null himself has given out mixed messages about who's allowed onto KF.
3) Null knew that his users were just dumping their porn folders onto KF, having banned a user for doing that. Null also instructed his users to not just upload porn images "as is" but to write reviews of the porn they were uploading, so Null could later claim these images were cross-posted in the name of fair use criticism.
The receipts (Null in his own words):
Here is the 2021 post in question where Null wrote:
"This is how you write a post, using private tags, so that the content is discoverable and the post will easily endure a copyright infringement claim.". Null also made it known that he was aware of the fact that he was on legal shaky ground by allowing his users to cross-post porn onto KF:
"Search engines really do not like 'nonconsensual pornography'. Surprise: This applies to consensual pornography, sold as product, hosted for critical review elsewhere."
Here's Null asking Kiwis in the Soyjak.Party / The Sharty thread not to post CP or CSAM onto KF:
Here is Null banning someone from the Porncows thread for appearing to dump their porn folder onto KF, which according to Null contained
"the most suspect shit imaginable. I hate Japan and I hate coomers":
Here's Null approving a take down request because he agreed that someone had cross-posted a .zip of a full game to KF to deny the maker money: "The message included a statement that someone had
"bought the game for everyone else to enjoy without having to give him a cent". This does not meet fair use."
If goes without saying that Null would've never responded similarly if someone had contacted him about taking down the cross-posted porn on his forum.
Here's Null in the Nick Rekieta thread, linking to his "how to cross-post porn to KF under the guise of fair use criticism" tutorial, while again instructing Kiwis to cut large videos into chunks and write criticism about each video segment before uploading them to KF:
To conclude, I do not think that porn stops being porn just because it's cross-posted to KF to be "criticized". Null can shout at his users all he wants, warning them to not to use KF for "porno-laundering", banning them for doing so, but such porno-laundering is kind of inevitable given the nature of the website. The content on KF is intended to shock and disgust the reader/viewer, and almost nothing arouses the kind of shock and disgust on KF that porn does. Therefore, I predict there will continue to be "porno-laundering" on KF, regardless of Null's efforts to stop this.
The fact that Null has to instruct his users to write reviews of the porn they are cross-posting to KF shows that Null was aware of the fact that such material could get him into legal trouble, so he had to remind his users to create the bare minimum pretense of fair use criticism for Null to be able to justify his users uploading such obscenity to KF.
Clearly Epik was not persuaded by such "bare minimum" efforts at meeting the fair use standard.
So nope, sorry, can't have your cake and eat it. If an ISP says "no obscenity" in their ToS, don't try to bypass their rules through a shady backroom deal with the CEO. You should respect their ToS and go find another ISP that does allow you to post all the obscenity you want in the name of your anti-LGBT crusade.
Owner Of Largest Adult Content Website Was DEFENSE ATTORNEY For Child Abusers
