All Races, ethnicities, religions. Gay or straight, cis or trans: We don't care. If you can rock with us: You are one of us


Community Featured Submissions 🧅
Tier 1:
Tier 2:
January 7, 2025: Nollywood actress, Toyin Abraham, has a meltdown over someone recording her new movie in a cinema
January 7, 2025: Social media personality and self-acclaimed therapist, Blessing Okoro, aka Blessing CEO, maintains there is nothing wrong with a therapist dating a client
January 10, 2025: Kim Jong Un (Supreme Leader of North Korea) visits Onionfarms
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
Further joshy's cuisine tastes...
joshylikesbiscuits.png
It's basically a rip off of the superior and British "National Treasure" The Penguin biscuit. In Burgerland, a biscuit is a scone like thing. It's ironic how joshy's tastes are so much of an anglophile. He should try Bourbon biscuits.

An irony: The limeys will always bang on about how shit American sweets are. Ignoring the fact that the two most famous here... you guessed it, are Snickers (Marathon in UK for many years) and the Mars Bar, both American products.
 
Has there ever been a pedophile more hiding it in plain sight than Joshua Connor Moon?


View attachment 45556

Gracious it would be a shame if someone sent Epik's legal team screenshots of him publicly bragging he wants to shake them down for money.

Josh is stupid and crazy but even for him it's kind of amazing how he's running around announcing this. Hey Josh, perhaps in your delirium of receiving 150,000 cultbucks you forgot the purpose of a defamation suit: you have to prove the other party's actions dealt significant psychological harm, or tarnished your otherwise good reputation in a significant way (lol), or had a negative monetary impact on your business. Josh has never mentioned any of these things because he knows to suggest any of this about him or a black listed site like Kiwi Farms is beyond absurd, not only that but from hour one he's been openly drooling at the prospect of scaring Epik into a settlement and owning that this is extortion. Someone actually hurting from defamation is not going to say "I'll go away if you pay me to". And if Hardin is knowingly playing along with this can he be investigated or penalized? He's already a big enough scumbag to offer his services to a radioactive psycho like Josh and knows about all the revenge porno and the site's body count so who knows what else he's been up to that could be uncovered.

Has he even hinted at what his strategy or even complaint with LFJ or Carabollo will be? Because I don't even think he or Hardin know. What judge is going to award you money for whining that these people contacted your host and complained you have a nest of fanatics screeching about how they want every tranny to 41% and publishing peoples SSNs and shit? Where is the lie? What a fucking hateable retard, he's too weird and stupid and full of hubris to make it out of this unscathed. If he was smart he would have asked Kiwis for a retirement fund and disappeared and they'd probably be pathetic enough to donate, instead he has to make it his crusade to prove a point nobody agrees with and at best is repulsed by. Good luck being directly scrutinized by normies for once in your life nutcase!
There is a thread on Matthew Hardin and from reading that thread you get the impression that Hardin isn't really the litigator type. I imagine that in order to procure the type of win in a defamation suit that would be Null's dream settlement, you would have to be a pretty tough litigator in court. Only a minority of lawyers are litigators.

Here is an article by a law firm on the harsh reality of being a successful litigator
https://www.gojolaw.com/private/policy/qualifications_for_employment.html
 
What is Null's policy on KiwiFarms users cross-posting porn and other types of obscenity under the guise of "fair use criticism"? Are Null and his users "porno-laundering" under the guise of promoting an anti-LGBT agenda? A detailed analysis showing the receipts (Null in his own words).

"The site is not a porn dump, revenge porn, or piracy site." - Null.

Let's look at these questions:

-What is "porno-laundering"? (aka the "porn stops being porn when it's crossposted to KF" argument)

-What did Null have to say about people using KiwiFarms for "porno-laundering"? (Null will actually ban users if he suspects porno-laundering!)

-Was Null instructing his users to add written criticism to porn uploads, as a pretext for "porno-laundering"?

-What's Null's policy on users cross-posting porn on KF to deny porn actors an income? (the "whores get nothing" argument)

- Null will remove users uploading .zips of pirated games deliberately onto KF to deny game devs an income... but not pirated porn?

I personally believe that Null was knowingly violating Epik's ToS barring obscenity, and I believe he was hoping to get away with it based on his previous backroom deal with Brian Royce. This is just my personal opinion based on what I have seen so far.

I was listening to this Livestream, and at this part the two people talking mention SRS or bottom surgery results being unrealistic. They recommend to their viewers that they visit the Stinkditch thread on KiwiFarms, which is basically the KF equivalent of the old /r/NeovaginaDisasters thread on Reddit:


Is Null going to deny that this thread exists on KF and that this thread would constitute a violation of Epik's ToS clause against any kind of obscenity? Or is he going to edge-case about this and say that "we are posting images of medical malpractice to denounce trans butchery, not to show REAL vaginas". Does that matter to the coomers who browse the farms looking exactly for this type of material?

Also, with the proliferation of "trans teens" having surgery at younger and younger ages (some even having their dicks cut off at 16, like Jazz Jennings)... how does Null and the TERFs who frequent the Stinkditch thread know that the examples of /r/NeovaginaDisasters posted in their thread aren't pictures of actual "trans teens" who had their genitals mangled? Or do they think that they, as adults, get to oogle at a legal minor's destroyed genitals, just because they're doing it in the name of their Righteous Quest of exposing the evil LGBT?

Null's argument is that he and his users should be allowed to cross-post porn - especially LGBT porn - to KF because they are not presenting these people in the original context, ie, as "pornographic" - as sexy and desirable - but rather in the new context of KF, where they are presented as monstrous, degenerate, disgusting, predatory and contemptible. Since everyone on KF either shares or is expected to share Null's anti-LGBT agenda, this is how those images are going to be read in their new context on KF. This is what I refer to as the "porn stops being porn when it's cross-posted to KF" argument.

I would also argue that this argument is complete bullshit because:

1) Null has no idea who is browsing his forum and for what purpose (Null cannot logically assume that everyone on KF shares his anti-LGBT agenda or is browsing the forum in that spirit)

2) Null himself let the degenerate predators of 16chan.nl's /phile board know that they were welcome on KF, when he openly stated he was pondering creating a new "pedophile containment" thread on KF. Thus Null himself has given out mixed messages about who's allowed onto KF.

3) Null knew that his users were just dumping their porn folders onto KF, having banned a user for doing that. Null also instructed his users to not just upload porn images "as is" but to write reviews of the porn they were uploading, so Null could later claim these images were cross-posted in the name of fair use criticism.

The receipts (Null in his own words):

Here is the 2021 post in question where Null wrote: "This is how you write a post, using private tags, so that the content is discoverable and the post will easily endure a copyright infringement claim.". Null also made it known that he was aware of the fact that he was on legal shaky ground by allowing his users to cross-post porn onto KF: "Search engines really do not like 'nonconsensual pornography'. Surprise: This applies to consensual pornography, sold as product, hosted for critical review elsewhere."

Featured on Apr 9, 2021 at 8:05 AM: The OnlyFans Era: How we have to deal with digital whores moving forward.

OnlyFans whores are ruining the entire fucking world. If you are on OnlyFans you are worth less than shit to me. Whores deserve nothing. I pray that God exists if only so whores will burn in hell.

That said, a lot of this whore drama is now on the site. A lot of lolcows are becoming whores. Here is a guideline for dealing with the legalities this presents. I will try to refine this so that any retard can understand it.


1. Search engines really do not like 'nonconsensual pornography'.
Surprise: This applies to consensual pornography, sold as product, hosted for critical review elsewhere.

To better comply with our overlords who can pull the plug on the discoverability of this site at any time, I am going to ask that people start using private tags on their own when posting nude photos. This is especially true on the first pages of threads and unedited photos/videos. Memes are more tolerable.

In general, your tag looks like this:

Becomes:
Spoiler: NSFW
 This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

Again, this ESPECIALLY APPLIES in the FIRST PAGE of any thread because that is the page you really do not want memory holed!


2. Your critical commentary today makes my fair use claim more viable tomorrow.
Take THIRTY SECONDS when posting OnlyFans content to write a genuine criticism. "lol fat" is a good start, but look specifically at the June leaks:
30-year-old e-girl said:
The full leak. I've added some qualified personal commentary. This is my review of a photography set.

This is how you write a post, using private tags, so that the content is discoverable and the post will easily endure a copyright infringement claim. I can look at that post and immediately decide I will throw down betting on its legality.

It's not a race to get leaks out onto the forum. Take your time. 30 seconds when you make your post can literally be worth thousands of dollars in an attorney's hourly pay later.



3. The site is not a porn dump, revenge porn, or piracy site.
I'm going to start deleting obvious porn dump threads outright. While all whores are contemptible, not all whores are lolcows. It helps a lot if the thread existed before the OnlyFans content did.

It's also not necessary that every single image uploaded to OnlyFans gets posted to the site. Pick your battles. I am not trying to cultivate an audience of mentally deranged fappening coomers who start treating the site itself like a whore.

Finally, do not ever make comments like "reposting this here to deprive this person of income/adrev on YT! lol!". Retards.


https://kiwifarms.net/threads/regarding-onlyfans-and-the-forum.88384/ Archived: https://archive.is/aKZqV#selection-1083.0-1419.15


Here's Null asking Kiwis in the Soyjak.Party / The Sharty thread not to post CP or CSAM onto KF:

Do not post images of child abuse on the site, even if it's censored. If you have evidence someone is posting child pornography on your website, you should not be trying to instigate vigilante justice on an Internet forum. https://www.missingkids.org/ https://tips.fbi.gov/

Here is Null banning someone from the Porncows thread for appearing to dump their porn folder onto KF, which according to Null contained "the most suspect shit imaginable. I hate Japan and I hate coomers":

Apr 13, 2023 #6,494
Fyi I've banned @870EVO for posting the most suspect shit imaginable. I hate Japan and I hate coomers.

If you're a racemixing pedo who is obsessed with porn and politics, just stay on /pol/.

Also, this site is SFW, and this is a thread about the prostitute/pornography industry, not for sharing porn.


https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...orn-and-porncows.14727/page-325#post-16112704
Archived: https://archive.is/CFtIW#selection-7359.0-7447.110

Porn and Porncows
Fyi I've banned @870EVO for posting the most suspect shit imaginable. I hate Japan and I hate coomers. If you're a racemixing pedo who is obsessed with porn and politics, just stay on /pol/. Also, this site is SFW, and this is a thread about the prostitute/pornography industry, not for sharing...
Null · Post #6,494 · Today at 7:43 AM · Forum: Multimedia
Null

Here's Null approving a take down request because he agreed that someone had cross-posted a .zip of a full game to KF to deny the maker money: "The message included a statement that someone had "bought the game for everyone else to enjoy without having to give him a cent". This does not meet fair use."

The below was not a complete takedown request but I actioned it by deleting the .zip file referenced in the complaint. The message included a statement that someone had "bought the game for everyone else to enjoy without having to give him a cent". This does not meet fair use.



Copyrighted Content Takedown Request

Hello, I represent Folk Games. I am contacting you to see that you not only remove my copyrighted content which is being hosted on your site to bypass having to pay for it, but also that you prevent any reuploads of my content from being uploaded in the future.

This is the link to the thread hosting this.

This is a link to my game that you have to pay to own.

And here is a link to my YouTube with the same email and name as this email to show that I am who I say I am.

I am all for archiving the past and I am fine with this forum disliking the game. What I don’t agree with is copyright infringement and the pirating of my still existing products.

I hope that you will take this seriously and remove the infringing content.

https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...s-hoodlum-folk-games-piracy-complaint.170290/ Archived: https://archive.is/U63PQ#selection-1061.0-1115.76

If goes without saying that Null would've never responded similarly if someone had contacted him about taking down the cross-posted porn on his forum.

Approved 2023-08-22 - Shads Hoodlum / Folk Games: Piracy complaint
The below was not a complete takedown request but I actioned it by deleting the .zip file referenced in the complaint. The message included a statement that someone had "bought the game for everyone else to enjoy without having to give him a cent". This does not meet fair use. Copyrighted...
Null · Thread · Yesterday at 10:22 AM · dillin thomas folk games piracy shads hoodlum · Replies: 19 · Forum: Take that off the god damn Internet!

Here's Null in the Nick Rekieta thread, linking to his "how to cross-post porn to KF under the guise of fair use criticism" tutorial, while again instructing Kiwis to cut large videos into chunks and write criticism about each video segment before uploading them to KF:

Oct 24, 2023 #48,184
I don't know why people are asking me for fair use advice because I'm not a lawyer and cannot and would not give you legal advice.

https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...reads/regarding-onlyfans-and-the-forum.88384/

If I was going to share and discuss a video, I would probably cut it into several chunks based on topic and provide a paragraph of critical commentary with each chunk. That way, it's easier to follow along and understand what is happening. I would do this because my intention would be to have a fair and critical discussion of a video, and not simply to share the video. I would also probably edit the video in some way, even if it was just to overlay a tweet to make that person look hypocritical, or maybe edit different segments together.


https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...a-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-17038476 Archived: https://archive.is/ttbOF#selection-1987.0-2049.543

Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta Law / @NickRekieta
I don't know why people are asking me for fair use advice because I'm not a lawyer and cannot and would not give you legal advice. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/regarding-onlyfans-and-the-forum.88384/ If I was going to share and discuss a video, I would probably cut it into several chunks...
Null · Post #48,185 · Yesterday at 8:27 PM · Forum: Grift Wars

To conclude, I do not think that porn stops being porn just because it's cross-posted to KF to be "criticized". Null can shout at his users all he wants, warning them to not to use KF for "porno-laundering", banning them for doing so, but such porno-laundering is kind of inevitable given the nature of the website. The content on KF is intended to shock and disgust the reader/viewer, and almost nothing arouses the kind of shock and disgust on KF that porn does. Therefore, I predict there will continue to be "porno-laundering" on KF, regardless of Null's efforts to stop this.

The fact that Null has to instruct his users to write reviews of the porn they are cross-posting to KF shows that Null was aware of the fact that such material could get him into legal trouble, so he had to remind his users to create the bare minimum pretense of fair use criticism for Null to be able to justify his users uploading such obscenity to KF.

Clearly Epik was not persuaded by such "bare minimum" efforts at meeting the fair use standard.

So nope, sorry, can't have your cake and eat it. If an ISP says "no obscenity" in their ToS, don't try to bypass their rules through a shady backroom deal with the CEO. You should respect their ToS and go find another ISP that does allow you to post all the obscenity you want in the name of your anti-LGBT crusade.

Owner Of Largest Adult Content Website Was DEFENSE ATTORNEY For Child Abusers
 
There is a thread on Matthew Hardin and from reading that thread you get the impression that Hardin isn't really the litigator type. I imagine that in order to procure the type of win in a defamation suit that would be Null's dream settlement, you would have to be a pretty tough litigator in court. Only a minority of lawyers are litigators.

Here is an article by a law firm on the harsh reality of being a successful litigator
https://www.gojolaw.com/private/policy/qualifications_for_employment.html
Gotta give you credit for reading all that. I sure as fuck didn't.
 
View attachment 45577
I've got to assume that "Wooly's" is Woolworth's. Woolies is a name I've not heard for years. There are Brit who are very nostalgic for that shop. Sweets, crap clothes and cheap records (as in, I did quite well getting 7"s like Birdhouse in your Soul for 50p, also got the etched 12" of Jesus Christ Pose. Aussie's are just crass, criminal gene'd brits. ANd remember... NO POOFTAHS!
Woolworths (woolies not "wooly's" illiterate retard null) is just a regular supermarket, it isn't the same as the British woolies. I think the name is just coincidental but I could be wrong on that.

An irony: The limeys will always bang on about how shit American sweets are. Ignoring the fact that the two most famous here... you guessed it, are Snickers (Marathon in UK for many years) and the Mars Bar, both American products.
The UK versions use proper Cadbury's chocolate though not mutt vomit chocolate, so are objectively better.

Honestly , Null's palate should've been called into question when he started singing the praises of Subway years before his cheese jihad
Well you now null shares TWO things with Jared from Subway.
 
Featured on Apr 9, 2021 at 8:05 AM: The OnlyFans Era: How we have to deal with digital whores moving forward.

OnlyFans whores are ruining the entire fucking world. If you are on OnlyFans you are worth less than shit to me. Whores deserve nothing. I pray that God exists if only so whores will burn in hell.

That said, a lot of this whore drama is now on the site. A lot of lolcows are becoming whores. Here is a guideline for dealing with the legalities this presents. I will try to refine this so that any retard can understand it.


1. Search engines really do not like 'nonconsensual pornography'.
Surprise: This applies to consensual pornography, sold as product, hosted for critical review elsewhere.
The terfs really think this guy is a great friend to the ladies.
 
No. They don't. Cadbury's is a different company. The aforementioned snacks are made by Mars. Just put shame in your confectionary name.
Oh yeah turns out you're right that they're owned by mars not Cadbury's (for some reason I thought one of them had bought the other)

Turns out the mars bar was invented in England, and the UK original still don't use gross vomit chocolate.

So I guess the yanks are eating an inferior version of a great British treat and being smug about it. Sad, many such cases.
 
Last edited:
Here's the Rekieta clip I got the above screenshots from:

Null's cult-of-personality stans are in the comments making fun of Rekieta, when he's making some very good points actually.

Are Kiwis reading these comments from people disputing Null's defamation claims underneath the Rekieta clip? I guess not:
View attachment 45162

Null claims that the xeet where Epik said "the US authorities forced us to take action" was defamatory because it implied that Null was either a suspect or being investigated... but why does Null read into this reference to "US Authorities" that HE is the implied suspect? (Guilty conscience?)
I wonder, has Null considered the possibility that Epik might have reached out to LE about the screenshots because they wanted to report the person that was in those screenshots, not Null himself? Not everything has to be about you, Null. You have a lot of gross people profiled on your forum that LE might wanna look into. If you and your users are uploading all kinds of "receipts" about these people but not actually reporting them to LE, your ISP might do that themselves, once they've realized the kind of people you and your users are profiling on your forum. What if Epik had received a report concerning the thread about the GoonClown (which is also full of public admissions of pedophilia on his part AND has a video of him masturbating while admitting to being a pedo) Epik reported the thread to the FBI, then xeeted about complying with "US Authorities"? How would that be defamatory?

If I was working at Epik's abuse department and I had received screenshots of what someone claimed was CP, I'd immediately forward the entire abuse report with all of the screenshots to LE, just to be safe. Is the likelihood of Epik doing that really so unusual and outrageous to Null?

Here's another possible scenario: What if Epik had received the screenshots, weren't sure what to do, so they contacted LE for advice on how to proceed lawfully, and it was LE who told Epik, "You must take down whatever website those pictures are on to stop the distribution of potential/suspected/alleged CP"? Is Epik engaged in defamation by stating they did whatever LE told them to do?

These are all possible scenarios, but it's Null who insists that there was no involvement from "US Authorities" and that "Epik admitted this [claim of LE involvement] was a lie". The fact is, Null simply doesn't know if there was any contact at all between "US Authorities" and Epik about the screenshots or anything else on his forum. However, if Epik, in good faith, believed that the initial abuse report concerned potential or suspected CP on a customer's website, more likely than not they would've contacted LE about it, whether they notified Null of this or not.

Is there truly no one left on KF who can explain these things to Null?
Can no one explain to Null that it's perfectly normal and customary for an ISP to contact LE when they've received an abuse report about potential CP on a customer's forum? That this doesn't mean the ISP has any malice towards Null as an individual, but they're just trying to follow the law when dealing with such material being reported to them?

Null has become a monomaniacal one-track mind who has surrounded himself with yes-men and cheerleaders who dare not challenge him on anything.
Josh said he couldn't listen to Rekieta because he sounded "too smug" in the first minute or so, but there was some very salient points he made about the courts will interpret the wordings of the tweets. Josh's lawyer might be pulling a Ty Beard and telling him things he wants to hear for a payday instead of being realistic with his chances of victory.
These statements from Josh were extra funny given last year he was giving the same advice to Rekieta in regards to his lawsuit with Montagraph, stating that Rekieta not using the word "probably" will greatly effect the case and how the court will interpret his words.

In case people forget, Rekieta is being sued for "defamation per se" which is the method Josh is using to try to sue Epik and others.
 
Last edited:
Null states on the latest MATI he will be taking a break because he is ever so tired of having to "run all over the place and talk on the phone for four hours." He seethes and bitches more than usual this episode. You'd think a guy who just got a boatload of money would be happy.
Gee he gets a bunch of money and immediately plans a vacation. Lol no refunds suckers.

Also during this episode Null describes how he is going to start filing FOIA requests and suing if they arent complied with. He also reveals that the Hardin guy his lawyer is an expert in this kind of thing. :story:

Looking very highly like this was a scam cooked up by Null and his lawyer to secure the seed capital to start some FOIA grift. He seems waaay more interested in this than his prospective lawsuit against epik.
 
The Didl/Null question gets brought up. Lol we were just talking about this, strange huh?
didlnull.png

1. No direct denial
2. Null has said before that KF is basically his entire social circle, it's near impossible to believe he isn't speaking to some of them in private
3. Believing Null has a cat is CrAzIeR than Didl who knows Null's every step down to the second to the point where people think "she" is either Null or a murderously obsessed stalker
4. Null is certain Lidl is a "she" I've seen him use his famous "they" for users he isn't sure of.
nulldidl2.png

Well this is not saying I am a proponent of thsi theory but it would mean he almost certainly isn't abroad as he probably wouldn't risk the complications of moving a pet across countries.
didlnull3.png

lol
didlnull4.png

...And Didl comes in seeming to know why Null is not freaked out by "her" zoophile Kathy Bates schtick... Curious for a guy who "doesn't speak to anyone privately his intentions are well known to a select few.
 
Back
Top