No fucking way, his lawyer's name is Hardin, Matthew? At least he's not a Catholic priest because that would be even more awkward.
Updates to Website
All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.
For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.We have sucessfully migrated - Welcome to the New Onionfarms. We are now being hosted out of the EU. Our New Server is i9, 9th Generation. It was freshly built. Our old server was i2, built in 2005. We will go up to 18X faster.
Topics of Interest
Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread
- Thread starter Randy Know
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 1776hosting 1776hosting.com 2tsuki bear chemical cringe deceptive deviant dick fancy fancy bear farms fat flow flow chemical fraud huckster josh joshua conner moon joshua connor moon joshua moon kengle kenneth erwin engelhardt kiwi kiwifarms mental illness moon null onionfarms picture pizza stocking vincent vincent zhen warwick ri zhen
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
Lmao perfect
Here's something: Notice when he's shilling his donate page and hyping up his incipient lolsuit then the money is "specifically for that purpose" but when at the point of collection, and when he gets challenged on not wanting to provide any paper trail for what it goes towards, then the money is a donation or gift direct to him and he can spend it on whatever he likes so stop asking questions.
Wastes all of it on pizza and non world helping type shit...that money's gonna sit around under his stomach rolls or he's shoving it up his ass for all we know, or he'll try to eat the money if he goes poor one day......(of course all of this is determined by his actions and the actions of his supporters but still) Can josh please snap his neck in half and maybe y'know film it for us all to see...fucking niggerish josh
Scamming his niggers into giving him money for his grift...josh moment indeed
Nektar Geist
An Onion Among Onions
Careful now, broom. It says nothing about killing woman, you might get sued for defamation.
It's like he's begging to be banned again from Twitter...
Quick, onion bros, I'm crowdfunding to get Elon to ban null with one of null's own ban messages. Only $75,000, I dead set promise I won't steal it
KampungBoy
Local Moderator
JESUS Look at this guy. Since Null is in hiding this will be his face in the legal proceedings. I did find a short promo he did for his university.
youthful_ shannel
An Onion Among Onions
This dude is adorable, he's going to get eaten alive by Epiks Jew lawyers.
KampungBoy
Local Moderator
Watch out Matt Null talks about how he would go after Ty Beard with a gun if he were Vic Mignona. Very unhinged Null.
lol
The Yoink Sploinker
Baby Onion
He's doing it on purpose so he can keep claiming to be the poor little underdog when he gets banned. Only way for him to score a W.
So I looked into this case and it's even more convoluted and weird than Null is letting on in his summary on the crowdfunding website. It's a classic case of Null gaslighting about what actually happened to make Epik seem culpable, when it's really just a case of an ISP receiving what to them seemed like a genuine abuse report and erring on the side of caution. I now suspect that Null just wants fuck-off money from Epik. He wants Epik to settle this out of court, to avoid the hassle of going to jury trial and being subjected to Null's endless gaslighting about what's allowed on his website and why, and why you need to just go along with it, your ToS be damned.
Here is Null's summary of the case against Epik on the fundraising website. Notice how he's conflating the Epik case with his case against Caraballo, which are really two different cases:
Notice how Null does not link to the xeets from Epik. He also does not link to the post on his website where the pictures of the masturbating man were posted, so people can see them in context for themselves and decide if that particular post violates Epik's ToS.
Compare the above summary to what Null actually said about the case on MATI:
In this MATI episode, we get a completely different retelling of events from the one on the crowdfunder website. According to the MATI episode, what actually happened was the following:
- There is a post on KiwiFarms where a certain "Telegram pedophile" is being profiled and exposed for being an admitted predator Telegram. - Null tellingly does not link to this post or go over it like he usually does on MATI, he only shows the screenshots from Epik's xeet. Anyone who's ever browsed KF knows the forum is full of such threads of alleged and proven/convicted social media pedophiles and predators. It would seem at first that these predators are being exposed on KF for the sake of justice/accountability, but Null explicitly stated on MATI that gay kids deserve to be raped by online predators just for being gay. Null features these threads and posts on his website as ragebait, against the LGBT community amongst his overwhelmingly far right audience, The purpose of these threads is not justice/accountability by rallying the genera public to report a Telegram pedophile to LE. Instead it meant to exposed the LGBT movement for what they "really" are, a threat to society. There is no indication on Null's part that he himself has bothered to contact Telegram or LE about the "Telegram pedophile" featured on his forum to put him behind bars where he belongs.
- Null claims that the "Telegram pedophile" featured on his forum has admitted to selling CP on Telegram. Additionally, the "Telegram pedophile" allegedly has claimed that he is not a real pedophile because he only abuses children for money. Null does not link to or show the posts in question where the "Telegram pedophile" made these alleged statements. Let's hope Turkey Tom will do an hour long video showing the actual posts with these alleged statements.
- The screeshots of a masturbating black man, that were sent to Epik in an abuse report, are supposedly pictures that the "Telegram pedo" took and posted of himself. According to Null's repeated argument, anyone who has voluntairly shared an intimate picture of themselves anywhere on the internet should submit themselves to the fact that it can be endlessly reproduced in contexts outside of their control or intent.
- Null claims to have a copy of the "Telegram pedo"'s passport, which is featured in the same post as these pictures. Null does not explain how he has obtained a copy of this man's passport, and he does not mention this fact on his crowdfunding website. Null does casually mention it on the February 2nd 2024 MATI episode, insisting that Epik should've looked at this copy of the man's passport to determine how old he actually is, regardless of how young he looks in the photographs. Null compared the watermark of the photographs to the date of birth copy of his passport, and concluded that he was 19 years old when he took those pictures of himself masturbating. Null concluded that since 1) the Telegram pedophile shared these pictures on his own and 2) he was 19 at time, this means Null has a right to feature those pictures on his website as part of the post exposing the pedophile.
Here is Null mentioning the passport on MATI: "Because one of those things, is a passport, and it says here, date of birth, August 15th, 2002. This person is a pedophile, BTW. He sells child pornography on Telegram."
- Here's where it gets really crazy: Null claims that the "Telegram pedophile" himself was the one who sent the abuse report to Epik, essentially reporting his own KiwiFarms thread to Epik. Null does not present any evidence for this particular claim. I still don't know how Null has determined this. Again, let's wait for that hour-long Turkey Tom documentary to see the evidence.
Now let's look at this story from the perspective of Epik: You work at Epik's abuse department. You have just received an abuse report claiming CP, with screenshots of pictures of a masturbating black man, who appears to look underage. The abuse report states that these pictures have been posted for all to see on the web forum of one of your customers, providing a link to the specific forum post. Again, AFAIK the abuse report itself has not been shared, and I don't know if Null has actually seen it. Null does speak about the abuse report on MATI as if he has (because how does Null know it was sent by the pedo himself?), but again, this could be his usual gaslighting. Presumably whomever sent this abuse report to Epik made sure to mention that the pictures were shared in a pedophilic context. Perhaps the report said something like: "KiwiFarms has a thread about a pedophile on Telegram and that thread includes pictures of the pedophile masturbating in violation of your ToS.". Is it really that weird that Epik's abuse department, upon receiving such an abuse report with such explicit pictures, deceided to err on the side of caution and block KF for appearing to violate their ToS?
Null apparently expected Epik to go through the abuse report as well as his forum post with a fine tooth comb to figure out what's what. Null insists that Epik should've browsed his forum at length (as if Epik have the time to go through all that turbo autism thunderdome) and taken the time to check the copy of the pedophile's passport featured on his forum. Null is stuck so deep in his personal bubble of casual internet doxxers, that he now expects everyone around him to live by his forum rules - which he himself will casually break anyway. Null does not seem to understand that when a normie receives a bunch of explicit pictures of a youthful looking man with the word "pedophile" all around them, their natural reaction is to "block now, ask questions later".
Null's argument hinges on the only way the only way Epik could've checked the age of the man in question, is by consulting the doxx - the copy of the man's passport - featured on Null's forum. Does Null really not realize how utterly absurd it is to expect others, who are not in the busness of casually doxxing people, to browse the doxx on his website for answers and clues as to what they're looking at? How does Epik know that the passport featured on his website is even real? More importantly, Epik stated on Xitter that they not only blocked KF for what they perceived to be CP but also for, quote, "doxxing". Perhaps Epik did see the passport, but instead suspected that a minor was being exposed and doxxed, pictures and passport and all.
Now that I've pieced together what actually happened here, it's even more infuriating to me that Null has managed to sell this whole bizarre story to his followers as Epik somehow acting in bad faith to defame him.
If Null has determined that it was the Telegram pedophile reporting his own thread to Epik, why doesn't Null sue the pedophile himself to put him in his place? Oh right, because "gay kids deserve to be raped by online predators for being gay" according to Null, so Null doesn't actually care about stopping a pedophile's predation on Telegram, as long as he gets the juicy pictures of everything for his forum.
Anyways, I'd love to see how Null's lawyer would spin this before a jury, but I suspect Null just wants to get an out of court settlement from Epik, not an actual lolsuit. Epik just went through a controversial reorganization, so they probably can't afford to get in any lolsuits right now. I suspect Null is using Kiwi money to hold a legal gun against Epik's head to force them to give him... basically even more money. I can totally understand if Epik - or Caraballo for that matter - decides to pay Null some fuck-off money rather than have to deal with his bullshit gaslighting in court about what he allows to be posted on his forum and why.
I hope any ISPs looking at this will appreciate the spectacle of Null taking an ISP to court for enforcing their ToS, where they explicitly state they don't want any liability over, quote, "pornography or obscene materials". Clearly posting pictures of a Telegram pedophile fingering his asshole is of such pertinent urgency that Epik's ToS just has to make way for Null warning the world about this menace to society.
BTW, I looked up Epik's ToS on Archive.org to see if it has changed since Null left them... and there are multiple captures of that particular page, every day since Null announced he was going to sue them. Someone has been capturing Epik's ToS page, presumably because they hope to catch Epik in the act of retroactively changing their ToS. No need to change the ToS though, it plainly states in very basic standard language, that Epik doesn't want to be liable for any pornography or obscenity being hosted through their service. You agreed to this ToS, Null. You really think you can break the ToS just because your users felt the burning need to expose a Telegram pedophile fingering his asshole on your web forum?
Here is Null's summary of the case against Epik on the fundraising website. Notice how he's conflating the Epik case with his case against Caraballo, which are really two different cases:
Notice how Null does not link to the xeets from Epik. He also does not link to the post on his website where the pictures of the masturbating man were posted, so people can see them in context for themselves and decide if that particular post violates Epik's ToS.
Compare the above summary to what Null actually said about the case on MATI:
In this MATI episode, we get a completely different retelling of events from the one on the crowdfunder website. According to the MATI episode, what actually happened was the following:
- There is a post on KiwiFarms where a certain "Telegram pedophile" is being profiled and exposed for being an admitted predator Telegram. - Null tellingly does not link to this post or go over it like he usually does on MATI, he only shows the screenshots from Epik's xeet. Anyone who's ever browsed KF knows the forum is full of such threads of alleged and proven/convicted social media pedophiles and predators. It would seem at first that these predators are being exposed on KF for the sake of justice/accountability, but Null explicitly stated on MATI that gay kids deserve to be raped by online predators just for being gay. Null features these threads and posts on his website as ragebait, against the LGBT community amongst his overwhelmingly far right audience, The purpose of these threads is not justice/accountability by rallying the genera public to report a Telegram pedophile to LE. Instead it meant to exposed the LGBT movement for what they "really" are, a threat to society. There is no indication on Null's part that he himself has bothered to contact Telegram or LE about the "Telegram pedophile" featured on his forum to put him behind bars where he belongs.
- Null claims that the "Telegram pedophile" featured on his forum has admitted to selling CP on Telegram. Additionally, the "Telegram pedophile" allegedly has claimed that he is not a real pedophile because he only abuses children for money. Null does not link to or show the posts in question where the "Telegram pedophile" made these alleged statements. Let's hope Turkey Tom will do an hour long video showing the actual posts with these alleged statements.
- The screeshots of a masturbating black man, that were sent to Epik in an abuse report, are supposedly pictures that the "Telegram pedo" took and posted of himself. According to Null's repeated argument, anyone who has voluntairly shared an intimate picture of themselves anywhere on the internet should submit themselves to the fact that it can be endlessly reproduced in contexts outside of their control or intent.
- Null claims to have a copy of the "Telegram pedo"'s passport, which is featured in the same post as these pictures. Null does not explain how he has obtained a copy of this man's passport, and he does not mention this fact on his crowdfunding website. Null does casually mention it on the February 2nd 2024 MATI episode, insisting that Epik should've looked at this copy of the man's passport to determine how old he actually is, regardless of how young he looks in the photographs. Null compared the watermark of the photographs to the date of birth copy of his passport, and concluded that he was 19 years old when he took those pictures of himself masturbating. Null concluded that since 1) the Telegram pedophile shared these pictures on his own and 2) he was 19 at time, this means Null has a right to feature those pictures on his website as part of the post exposing the pedophile.
Here is Null mentioning the passport on MATI: "Because one of those things, is a passport, and it says here, date of birth, August 15th, 2002. This person is a pedophile, BTW. He sells child pornography on Telegram."
- Here's where it gets really crazy: Null claims that the "Telegram pedophile" himself was the one who sent the abuse report to Epik, essentially reporting his own KiwiFarms thread to Epik. Null does not present any evidence for this particular claim. I still don't know how Null has determined this. Again, let's wait for that hour-long Turkey Tom documentary to see the evidence.
Now let's look at this story from the perspective of Epik: You work at Epik's abuse department. You have just received an abuse report claiming CP, with screenshots of pictures of a masturbating black man, who appears to look underage. The abuse report states that these pictures have been posted for all to see on the web forum of one of your customers, providing a link to the specific forum post. Again, AFAIK the abuse report itself has not been shared, and I don't know if Null has actually seen it. Null does speak about the abuse report on MATI as if he has (because how does Null know it was sent by the pedo himself?), but again, this could be his usual gaslighting. Presumably whomever sent this abuse report to Epik made sure to mention that the pictures were shared in a pedophilic context. Perhaps the report said something like: "KiwiFarms has a thread about a pedophile on Telegram and that thread includes pictures of the pedophile masturbating in violation of your ToS.". Is it really that weird that Epik's abuse department, upon receiving such an abuse report with such explicit pictures, deceided to err on the side of caution and block KF for appearing to violate their ToS?
Null apparently expected Epik to go through the abuse report as well as his forum post with a fine tooth comb to figure out what's what. Null insists that Epik should've browsed his forum at length (as if Epik have the time to go through all that turbo autism thunderdome) and taken the time to check the copy of the pedophile's passport featured on his forum. Null is stuck so deep in his personal bubble of casual internet doxxers, that he now expects everyone around him to live by his forum rules - which he himself will casually break anyway. Null does not seem to understand that when a normie receives a bunch of explicit pictures of a youthful looking man with the word "pedophile" all around them, their natural reaction is to "block now, ask questions later".
Null's argument hinges on the only way the only way Epik could've checked the age of the man in question, is by consulting the doxx - the copy of the man's passport - featured on Null's forum. Does Null really not realize how utterly absurd it is to expect others, who are not in the busness of casually doxxing people, to browse the doxx on his website for answers and clues as to what they're looking at? How does Epik know that the passport featured on his website is even real? More importantly, Epik stated on Xitter that they not only blocked KF for what they perceived to be CP but also for, quote, "doxxing". Perhaps Epik did see the passport, but instead suspected that a minor was being exposed and doxxed, pictures and passport and all.
Now that I've pieced together what actually happened here, it's even more infuriating to me that Null has managed to sell this whole bizarre story to his followers as Epik somehow acting in bad faith to defame him.
If Null has determined that it was the Telegram pedophile reporting his own thread to Epik, why doesn't Null sue the pedophile himself to put him in his place? Oh right, because "gay kids deserve to be raped by online predators for being gay" according to Null, so Null doesn't actually care about stopping a pedophile's predation on Telegram, as long as he gets the juicy pictures of everything for his forum.
Anyways, I'd love to see how Null's lawyer would spin this before a jury, but I suspect Null just wants to get an out of court settlement from Epik, not an actual lolsuit. Epik just went through a controversial reorganization, so they probably can't afford to get in any lolsuits right now. I suspect Null is using Kiwi money to hold a legal gun against Epik's head to force them to give him... basically even more money. I can totally understand if Epik - or Caraballo for that matter - decides to pay Null some fuck-off money rather than have to deal with his bullshit gaslighting in court about what he allows to be posted on his forum and why.
I hope any ISPs looking at this will appreciate the spectacle of Null taking an ISP to court for enforcing their ToS, where they explicitly state they don't want any liability over, quote, "pornography or obscene materials". Clearly posting pictures of a Telegram pedophile fingering his asshole is of such pertinent urgency that Epik's ToS just has to make way for Null warning the world about this menace to society.
BTW, I looked up Epik's ToS on Archive.org to see if it has changed since Null left them... and there are multiple captures of that particular page, every day since Null announced he was going to sue them. Someone has been capturing Epik's ToS page, presumably because they hope to catch Epik in the act of retroactively changing their ToS. No need to change the ToS though, it plainly states in very basic standard language, that Epik doesn't want to be liable for any pornography or obscenity being hosted through their service. You agreed to this ToS, Null. You really think you can break the ToS just because your users felt the burning need to expose a Telegram pedophile fingering his asshole on your web forum?
I hope he gets banned so he sues Twitter too for disrupting his frozen peach.
Josh shares this on Telegram just now. Very curious given the very recent plausible confirmation that Byuu truly is dead.
Last edited:
What do gay kids who watch nekoshota deserve null?
I quit.
There is nothing more important to null than a black man fingering his asshole. A black man fingering his asshole is the essence of free speech.
It worked so well for Meghan Murphy...
Re: my claim that Caraballo is connected to various big LGBT legal funds including Lambda Legal, here is a copy of a header of one of Caraballo's e-mails (which Null went over on MATI at the time), where Caraballo has CCed a number of these legal funds and other LGBT non-profits concerned with TRA:
- GLAAD.org
- Lambdalegal.org
- TransgenderLegal.org
- Transgenderlawcenter.org
- Equalityfederation.org
- Transequality.org
- HRC.org
- NCLrights.org
- Globalextremism.org
- Counterhate.co.uk
You can also see vijaya@twitter.com in this header. Vijaya Gadde was the chief Twitter censorlawyer who was exposed in the Twitter Files as having assisted the FBI and other US government agencies with the censorship of citizens' tweets on various political issues.
Caraballo was so well connected that he was directly e-mailing with Twitter's chief lawyer about the #DropKiwiFarms campaign! This is what Null will be going up against if he sues Caraballo. A very well connected TRA lawyer with direct lines not just to all the LGBT legal orgs/funds, but also to the in-house SJW censorlawyers at the big tech platforms. Null still thinks he can win this... which I guess is why Null called himself "a madman" on MATI.
It hard for me to have any empathy whatsoever for Caraballo whom I despise, not just for being a fucking TRA but particularly for being a far-left anarchist who openly tweeted that he wants to "accost" SCOTUS judges whom "should never know peace again" and "should never have a peaceful moment in public again":
To give you an idea of what a massive hypocrite and opportunist Caraballo is, here he was during #DropKiwiFarms admitting that doxxing is technically legal, but he still doesn't like it just because he and his mom got doxxed by KF:
I do think it's some straight up bullshit for Null to pretend before his donors that he's going to sue Caraballo over his rexeeting of the Epik xeet, as opposed for the actual reason Null wants to go after Caraballo, namely his participation in #DropKiwiFarms.
Allow me to remind Null that Caraballo wasn't the only one who claimed, for the duration of #DropKiwiFarms, that KF was hosting CP or CSAM. So did Caraballo and Liz Fong-Jones' public associate Kevin Karhan from The Gray Hat Academy. Naia Okami, who had broken ranks with #DropKiwiFarms shortly after the start of the campaign, exposed in a Twitter thread that #DKF members were encouraged to contact abuse departments of ISP and lie about KF hosting CP to kneejerk them into dropping KF:
Here's Caraballo's and LFJ's associate Kevin Karhan on Twitter again, claiming he had reported KF to German LE for various alleged violations of German laws, including the alleged hosting CSAM: "as well as hosting #CSAM"
Anyways, if Caraballo is taken to court - after having fundraised millions amongst all the Youtube multi-millionaire troons who hate KF because they have threads there - and then has to explain why he rexeeted the Epik xeet, all Caraballo has to do is point out that Null has a public history of being accused of hosting all kinds actionable material on his website, and that this public history was enough for Caraballo to consider the claim of suspected CP in Epik's xeet credible enough to rexeet.
For those of you who missed it, there was the Gandi incident, where Null was kicked off a French ISP over an allegedly pedophilic anime excerpt on his forum:
Here's what Null himself had to say about the above incident:
Null denied that the anime excerpt posted to his forum was pedophilic... and yet nowadays you have Null arguing on MATI that all anime is inherently pedophilic, because it's Japanese and Japan is a country of pedophiles according to Null. A clear case of "have your cake and eat it".
I don't know if Vermont has anti-SLAPP but if it does Caraballo might even file an anti-SLAPP motion arguing that the re-xeet is protected free speech that was part of his anti-KF activism.
BTW, here's Caraballo on Twitter during #DropKiwiFarms, complaining about how he makes $94k a year working at Harvard clinic and how this is still not enough for him:
Anyways, Caraballo won't have to spend his $94k from Harvard defending himself against Null, because all the troons who hate KF will give Caraballo free money for his defense. The only grift bigger than Null's free speech grift is the TRA grift.
Yet he personally deletes this art from my ava for being "loli":
God I wish I had that problem.