Updates to Website

All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.

For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.

We have sucessfully migrated - Welcome to the New Onionfarms. We are now being hosted out of the EU. Our New Server is i9, 9th Generation. It was freshly built. Our old server was i2, built in 2005. We will go up to 18X faster.

Topics of Interest

Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread

Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
The Gays From LA said:
Here's the Rekieta clip I got the above screenshots from:

Null's cult-of-personality stans are in the comments making fun of Rekieta, when he's making some very good points actually.

Are Kiwis reading these comments from people disputing Null's defamation claims underneath the Rekieta clip? I guess not:
View attachment 45162

Null claims that the xeet where Epik said "the US authorities forced us to take action" was defamatory because it implied that Null was either a suspect or being investigated... but why does Null read into this reference to "US Authorities" that HE is the implied suspect? (Guilty conscience?)
I wonder, has Null considered the possibility that Epik might have reached out to LE about the screenshots because they wanted to report the person that was in those screenshots, not Null himself? Not everything has to be about you, Null. You have a lot of gross people profiled on your forum that LE might wanna look into. If you and your users are uploading all kinds of "receipts" about these people but not actually reporting them to LE, your ISP might do that themselves, once they've realized the kind of people you and your users are profiling on your forum. What if Epik had received a report concerning the thread about the GoonClown (which is also full of public admissions of pedophilia on his part AND has a video of him masturbating while admitting to being a pedo) Epik reported the thread to the FBI, then xeeted about complying with "US Authorities"? How would that be defamatory?

If I was working at Epik's abuse department and I had received screenshots of what someone claimed was CP, I'd immediately forward the entire abuse report with all of the screenshots to LE, just to be safe. Is the likelihood of Epik doing that really so unusual and outrageous to Null?

Here's another possible scenario: What if Epik had received the screenshots, weren't sure what to do, so they contacted LE for advice on how to proceed lawfully, and it was LE who told Epik, "You must take down whatever website those pictures are on to stop the distribution of potential/suspected/alleged CP"? Is Epik engaged in defamation by stating they did whatever LE told them to do?

These are all possible scenarios, but it's Null who insists that there was no involvement from "US Authorities" and that "Epik admitted this [claim of LE involvement] was a lie". The fact is, Null simply doesn't know if there was any contact at all between "US Authorities" and Epik about the screenshots or anything else on his forum. However, if Epik, in good faith, believed that the initial abuse report concerned potential or suspected CP on a customer's website, more likely than not they would've contacted LE about it, whether they notified Null of this or not.

Is there truly no one left on KF who can explain these things to Null?
Can no one explain to Null that it's perfectly normal and customary for an ISP to contact LE when they've received an abuse report about potential CP on a customer's forum? That this doesn't mean the ISP has any malice towards Null as an individual, but they're just trying to follow the law when dealing with such material being reported to them?

Null has become a monomaniacal one-track mind who has surrounded himself with yes-men and cheerleaders who dare not challenge him on anything.
Click to expand...
Josh said he couldn't listen to Rekieta because he sounded "too smug" in the first minute or so, but there was some very salient points he made about the courts will interpret the wordings of the tweets. Josh's lawyer might be pulling a Ty Beard and telling him things he wants to hear for a payday instead of being realistic with his chances of victory.
 
Last edited:
thefrogninja said:
Josh said he couldn't listen to Rekieta because he sounded "too smug" in the first minute or so, but there was some very salient points he made about the courts will interpret the wordings of the tweets. Josh's lawyer might be pulling a Ty Beard and telling him things he wants to hear for a payday instead of being realistic with his chances of victory.
Click to expand...
Sun Tzu say: If you enemy smug, might be good idea to find out why.
suntzu.png
 
thefrogninja said:
Josh's lawyer might be pulling a Ty Beard and telling him things he wants to hear for a payday instead of being realistic with his chances of victory
Click to expand...

Null's lawyer might have tried to show null that it was a fruitless exercise with little chance of success but Josh gonna Josh so now he's going along with it. Can you imagine trying to explain to null why he's wrong about something?
 
polonium said:
Null's lawyer might have tried to show null that it was a fruitless exercise with little chance of success but Josh gonna Josh so now he's going along with it. Can you imagine trying to explain to null why he's wrong about something?
Click to expand...
Yeah the last time Null dealt with him was the last Russel Greer suit and he has become a lot more neurotic and controlling since then. He also probably thinks he can just throw this money at the problem and it ill go away quickly while repeating a bunch of stuff he half heard from the vic lasagna case and others. Ya it must suck to be that lawyer.
 
polonium said:
Null's lawyer might have tried to show null that it was a fruitless exercise with little chance of success but Josh gonna Josh so now he's going along with it. Can you imagine trying to explain to null why he's wrong about something?
Click to expand...
I feel like there's someone else in Joshs ear, the way he flipped out at that random Twitter account was not like him. Was it?
 
thefrogninja said:
Josh said he couldn't listen to Rekieta because he sounded "too smug" in the first minute or so, but there was some very salient points he made about the courts will interpret the wordings of the tweets. Josh's lawyer might be pulling a Ty Beard and telling him things he wants to hear for a payday instead of being realistic with his chances of victory.
Click to expand...
I mean, 100k lootbox right there up for grabs, who wouldnt want a piece of that kiwipie especially cherub like creatures (lawyers)
 
Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt said:
The most delicious part of this will be watching Null's house of cards fall apart and his lawyer telling him to get lost.
Click to expand...
You think the kwiffar won't drown in cope trying to justify Josh grifting? Even when it turns out he's just walked off with the cash, they'll say it was worth it for all the "work" he did or something.
 
I wonder about this particular comment that was left 9 days ago underneath the Elissa Clips excerpt of Null discussing his beef with Epik, from some Youtube account @hellamean who claims that Null is defaming him by calling him a pedophile:

CommentUnderElissaClipsVideo.jpg


@hellamean
9 days ago (edited)
I’m not a pedophile, those statements Josh is giving out are completely false. This is defamation.

I’m 100% sure Epik LLC will win because people like Josh and his criminal site can’t be tolerated especially with their false claims. It’s clearly a form of harassment that him and his site is bringing forth.
Click to expand...

Link to the comment itself.
Archived: https://archive.is/VrbEW#selection-5050.1-5139.208

Is this @hellamean the same person from the screenshots that were sent to Epik, or is it just a troll impersonating him on Youtube? He(?) denies being a pedo, which is why I am asking if this comment is real or a troll/impersonator.

If @hellamean reads this, if this comment is really you, please log into OF and explain what was in those blurred screenshots and how they ended up on KF. Also, address if Null's claim that you sent those screenshots to Epik yourself just to dupe Epik into taking down KF is also true. Lastly, explain why/how Null has a copy of your passport.

This is his channel:

Archive: https://archive.is/Cu2bJ

What do you think guys? Is this a troll or the actual guy from the screenshots?
I have still not seen the actual forum post itself with the unblurred screenshots, so I honestly can't tell if it's him or not.
Why would he be commenting underneath the Elissa Clips video denying everything, if he's (not) the actual guy?

OMFG, this better be a troll or this shit is getting weirder and weirder... 🤨
 
Last edited:
The Gays From LA said:
I wonder about this particular comment that was left 9 days ago underneath the Elissa Clips excerpt of Null discussing his beef with Epik, from some Youtube account @hellamean who claims that Null is defaming him by calling him a pedophile:

View attachment 45210



Link to the comment itself.
Archived: https://archive.is/VrbEW#selection-5050.1-5139.208

Is this @hellamean the same person from the screenshots that were sent to Epik, or is it just a troll impersonating him on Youtube? He(?) denies being a pedo, which is why I am asking if this comment is real or a troll/impersonator.

If @hellamean reads this, if this comment is really you, please log into OF and explain what was in those blurred screenshots and how they ended up on KF. Also, address if Null's claim that you sent those screenshots to Epik yourself just to dupe Epik into taking down KF is also true. Lastly, explain why/how Null has a copy of your passport.

This is his channel:

Archive: https://archive.is/Cu2bJ

What do you think guys? Is this a troll or the actual guy from the screenshots?
I have still not seen the actual forum post itself with the unblurred screenshots, so I honestly can't tell if it's him or not.
Why would be be commenting underneath the Elissa Clip if he's the actual guy?

OMFG, this better be a troll or this shit is getting weirder and weirder... 🤨
Click to expand...
Yeah that looks like a genuine statement
 
Galactic Innerways said:
Yeah that looks like a genuine statement
Click to expand...
I need more information, TBH. It could be a troll/impersonator. Let's wait and see if he comes out and identifies himself.
Like I said, I haven't see the actual KF post with the unblurred pictures that were sent to Epik, so I can't even tell if it's even his photo on that Youtube account. Could be anyone AFAIAC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top