Updates to Website

All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.

For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.

We have sucessfully migrated - Welcome to the New Onionfarms. We are now being hosted out of the EU. Our New Server is i9, 9th Generation. It was freshly built. Our old server was i2, built in 2005. We will go up to 18X faster.

Topics of Interest

Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread

Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
James Rustle said:
"not tracked" just like how he "doesn't" keep IPs except he demonstrably does.

Also "I don't get to keep any of it, I just get to spend it on whatever I like and keep what I spent it on"

This fat tub of shit has no job and doesn't do any work at all, although I suppose at his BMI the effort of climbing off the computer chair and waddling to the fridge probably seems like a lot of effort.
Click to expand...
b82c723b157c7ba632dacd0da4d952b9.gif
 
youthful_ shannel said:
HARK, the gays speaks!
Click to expand...

And I have more to say about the bullshit claim that an ISP explaining on Xitter that they are denying someone service for plainly violating their "no porn" rule (again, "no porn" doesn't just mean "no CP", it means no pornography whatsoever! With or without spoilers, whether it's fair use criticism or not!) is somehow "defamation".

Null said the same bullshit about starting a 75k lolsuit and suing LFJ which never happened. Since everyone has the memory of an amoeba apparently, the receipts are below. Null openly admitted, quote, "I do not have the financial means to pursue legal options.". He also admitted this to me in private BTW, when I asked him why he wouldn't sue Zayo in France. This was Null's standard answer for the whole time of #DropKiwiFarms.

Null posted at the time that if someone on KF would just give him 75k he'd finally make true on his threats to sue LFJ. The truth is that none of his listeners/users have that kind of disposable income, even if they crowdsource their pinched pennies and lunch money. You guys need to realize that Null will posts these idle legal threats whenever he's angry and powerless about something to make himself seem big and powerful.

Here's Null making idle legal threats while e-begging at the time:

Cogent's CEO is directly involved in trying to censor the Kiwi Farms
$75,000 to take something to trial. At the very least. At a fucking minimum. If you want to pay me $75,000 in cryptocurrency I will sue Liz Fong-Jones tomorrow.
Null · Post #182 · Today at 1:13 PM · Forum: Forum Discussion
https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...to-censor-the-kiwi-farms.174372/post-17048580 Archived: https://archive.is/Nn2Rg#selection-1463.0-1467.84
Click to expand...

Here are his other posts at the time, for those who haven't read them:

Null
Cogent's CEO is directly involved in trying to censor the Kiwi Farms
Oh yeah probably mate but let me say this again: I do not have the financial means to pursue legal options. Anyone have any questions in regards to "I cannot fucking afford this so shut the fuck up"?
Null · Post #181 · Today at 1:12 PM · Forum: Forum Discussion
Null
Cogent's CEO is directly involved in trying to censor the Kiwi Farms
For the millionth time: if Liz Fong-Jones, Keffals, and a million other entities were committing civil torts against this forum and myself every day, it would not matter, because I do not have the financial means to pursue legal action against them.
Null · Post #179 · Today at 1:12 PM · Forum: Forum Discussion
Null
Cogent's CEO is directly involved in trying to censor the Kiwi Farms
It's literally the only thing I haven't tried yet so I'm going to do it. Unless you're going to give me about $10,000/mo to explore the other more expensive options currently out of reach, shut the fuck up.
Null · Post #174 · Today at 1:10 PM · Forum: Forum Discussion
Click to expand...

So, no, there's not gonna be a lolsuit, because Null cannot prove that Epik were acting in bad faith when they posted those screenshots in Xitter to demonstrate that Null had violated their "no porn" rule by allowing whatever kind of porn to be posted on KF. Whether the person in the pictures was 19 at the time or not (again, how does Null know this? Where did he get that copy of their passport from?) is irrelevant, whether the pictures were meant as fair use commentary or not is irrelevant. Epik explaining themselves on Xitter is not "defamation". That's an ISP going out of their way to show everyone why they acted the way they did. Does Null really think that Epik would've shared those screenshots on Xitter for the whole world to see if they were acting in bad faith? Epik shared the screenshots because they were confident that any casual onlooker would agree with them that these violate their stated rules. Not gonna lie, I'd love to see how Null's lawyer in Vermont is gonna spin this in court.

It's just the usual bullshit threats from cranky Null, who would do better to save up his pennies to get his BFF Vincent Zhen out of the legal shit Vinnie got himself in by not showing up in court when LFJ sued him. Notice how we haven't gotten any updates whatsoever on Vincent's Appeal of the summary judgement? It's because, as Null admitted on MATI, no Australian lawyer is willing to talk to Null about appealing the default judgement. What do you think Null is gonna do with that $75k for the Epik lolsuit if he can't appeal the Australian default judgement in due time?

To conclude, Null announced on MATI that he'll be leaving Europe and returning back to the US sometime this year.

So, good job all you MATI/KF paypiggies, you dutifully financed Null's return back to the US.

I sincerely hope Null stays in the US forever and never goes back to Europe ever again. I wonder how many European ISPs he burned through "trying to keep KiwiFarms online" trying to grift before he decided that now was the time to return to the US.

Maybe the tax auditor in Serbia decided to have a closer look at this American living in their country as a "tourist" for over 3 years while paying for rent in crypto? Who knows.
 
KampungBoy said:
Well the fund has blown past 75k and is now north of 81k so the lolsuit is a go. I am actually pretty excited to see Null scrutinized by someone he can't ban and the potential subpoenaing of user info has big potential as well.
Click to expand...
I have seen on Elaine Discord an allegation that Josh has only raised $3K and has been manually adjusting the donations bar. This is consistent with the screenshot complaints by KF users that when they donated, the bar did not move to the right. It is also consistent with logic.
 
As for Null's threats to sue LFJ or Caraballo, Null fucking knows that if he tries to sue any TRA out there, that TRA will probably raise millions to defend themselves against a lolsuit from Null, on account of how widely hated KF is in the trans community and how many famous, high profile and filthy rich trans people - think of PhilosophyTube, ContraPoints, Kat Blaque, all famous trans Youtube millionaires - have been profiled on the forum who would immediately chip in with their Youtube millions. Especially if it's a highly connected Harvard troon like Caraballo who is themselves a highly connected activist lawyer. Caraballo is connected to Lambda Legal and shit, he would love nothing more than to unite every single troon lawyer in the US against Null. There has to be some TERF on KF who has studied the TRA milieu and can warn Null about how effective TRAs are at fundraising. Hell, I suspect none other than Riley Graceless NoSchlong himself might argue Caraballo's defense for free if asked by Caraballo, just for the privilege of being asked to do so.

Which is why I personally suspect this is all a grift meant to promote Null's new "alt-EFF", so he can use that to grift even more. Null said on MATI the other day that he's being, in his words, "a madman" for mounting this legal fund. Null himself is telling his donors straight-up that he's being crazy for threatening to sue Epik as well as these TRAs. So what logic is there to his madness, other than the bottom line of the grift?
 
KampungBoy said:
Null just because it isn't tracked on your end doesn't mean these people's banks wont be able to see it wtf?
Click to expand...
He never thinks things through like this, even with how he designed the site and stores info. He's like a toddler who can only learn from making mistakes.
The Gays From LA said:
I want you to know I actually went on vacation with the money I had saved up to donate to you during #DropKiwiFarms.
Click to expand...
Damn, you were going to donate a lot. I'm glad you didn't. I wouldn't donate a cent to any online community or GFM.
The Gays From LA said:
Epik explaining themselves on Xitter is not "defamation".
Click to expand...
Did anyone confirm Epik was still in control of their account when that post was written? It seemed like a shitpost.
The Gays From LA said:
What do you think Null is gonna do with that $75k for the Epik lolsuit if he can't appeal the Australian default judgement in due time?
Click to expand...
Buy pizza restaurant stock.
The Gays From LA said:
So, good job all you MATI/KF paypiggies, you dutifully financed Null's return back to the US.
Click to expand...
I doubt he ever left the US.
KampungBoy said:
"as good as cash" meaning he can spend it immediately.
Click to expand...
AKA buy a pizza immediately.
The Gays From LA said:
There has to be some TERF on KF who has studied the TRA milieu and can warn Null about how effective TRAs are at fundraising.
Click to expand...
He wouldn't listen, he gets his tard ideas in his head like CWC and that's it.
 
Last edited:
Josh believes if he considers a legal FUND a "donation" it isn't subject to refunds. Not sure how valid an argument that is since if he wanted donations he could set up a donation page. It's clearly a litigation fund. A fund that's up to his own personal discretion to use with zero transparency. Clearly such a fund may be subject refunds which is why he couldn't just blatantly say "sorry, no refunds" which is why he felt the need to write all that out.
KampungBoy said:
View attachment 45027
At least one guy is using a card directly tied to his real bank account lol.
View attachment 45028
Null also mentions he will not be stopping at Epik and intends to sue multiple parties.
Click to expand...
If he loses against Epik, he probably won't continue.
 
Last edited:
VAIDS Victim said:
Damn, you were going to donate a lot. I'm glad you didn't. I wouldn't donate a cent to any online community.
Click to expand...

During #DropKiwiFarms I myself was one of those gullible people donating 3 and 4 figures to Null right now. The other day during the MATI Livestream, someone immediately donated $10k to Null the very moment he posted the URL to the crowdfunder website on the screen. I was gonna donate 4 figures to Null during #DropKiwiFarms, not 5 figures like that MATI donor, but I can see where they're coming from. All these poor gullible people believe Null when he's telling them that he's fighting for free speech online. Fortunately Null himself proceeded to show his true nature to me, which is that of a gaslighting liar who thinks he can use and exploit people if he can get away with it, and thankfully I no longer believe anything Null says. I sincerely don't think that Null gives a fuck about free speech. I think he just likes the money, and especially the power that money gives him to threaten an ISP that he assumed was on his side. It's very telling that Null is threatening to sue an entity that until recently was on his side.

VAIDS Victim said:
Did anyone confirm they were still in control of their account when that post was written? It seemed like a shitpost.
Click to expand...
If they haven't removed the xeets since the exchange with Null then they were clearly not shitposting.
If it was just a misunderstanding due to a shitpost, why would Null continue to threaten Epik?
Null clearly thinks the xeets were serious, hence the legal threats.

Here's Epik's TOS, I have highlighted the parts that I suspect will be brought up during the lolsuit, if Null is dumb enough to file it:

C. You will NOT use our Site or Services in a manner (as determined by us in our sole and absolute discretion) that:

Violates the laws, regulations, ordinances, or other such requirements of any applicable Federal, State, or local government and/or international laws or customary industry acceptable use standards;

Promotes, encourages, or engages in child pornography or the exploitation of children;

Promotes, encourages, engages, or displays cruelty to humans or animals;

Promotes, encourages, or engages in terrorism, violence or hatred against people, animals, or property;

Transmits any unsolicited commercial or bulk email, or engages in any activity known or considered to be spamming or mail bombing;

Makes any illegal communication to any newsgroup, mailing list, chat facility, or another internet forum;

Makes, attempts, or allows any unauthorized access to our website, servers, account, your own hosting account (if any), or the account of any other customers of Epik;

Allows any remote code execution of malicious software through a hosting account or any APIs provided by us;

Causes denial of service attacks, port scans, or other endangering and invasive procedures against our servers and facilities or the servers and facilities of other network hosts or Internet users;

Infringes any copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, or other proprietary rights of any third party information;

Contains viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, corrupted files, or any other similar software or programs designed to, or capable of, disrupting, damaging, or limiting the functionality of any software or hardware;

Contains any kind of proxy server or other traffic relaying programs;

Engages in or instigates actions that cause harm to Epik or other customers;

Reverse engineers any API or attempts to use an API to obtain confidential information or circumvent an API in order to violate Epik restrictions;

Violates the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 or similar legislation, or promote, encourage, or engage in the sale or distribution of prescription medication without a valid prescription;

Violates the privacy or publicity rights of another user or any other person or entity, or breaches any duty of confidentiality that you owe to another user or any other person or entity.
Click to expand...

IN NO EVENT SHALL EPIK, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND ALL THIRD PARTY SERVICE PROVIDERS, BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING ANY THAT MAY RESULT FROM (...) IX) ANY USER CONTENT OR CONTENT THAT IS DEFAMATORY, HARASSING, ABUSIVE, HARMFUL TO MINORS OR ANY PROTECTED CLASS, PORNOGRAPHIC, “X-RATED”, OBSCENE, OR OTHERWISE OBJECTIONABLE
Click to expand...

Here's their Abuse policy:

Abuse Policy
In order to ensure that all abuse requests are investigated, please submit abuse report(s) at:

abuse[at]epik[dt]com

Please understand that we require evidence of the illegal activity prior to deactivation. Unfortunately, we cannot simply take reports at face value as there are often fake or inaccurate reports filed with us. Otherwise, please contact the host of the website who has control over the website content or the registrant of the domain directly.

If the complaint is regarding a UDRP or ICANN complaint, please email abuse@epik.com and we will respond to your email within the time frame specified.

www.epik.com

Abuse Policy - Epik

Domain Names & Web Hosting Made Easy!
www.epik.com www.epik.com
Click to expand...

Epik apparently concluded that the screenshots they had received violate at least one (probably more) subsection of section C of their TOS. Even if those screenshots aren't CP and the person in them truly was 19 as Null claims, Epik can still argue that they were erring on the side of caution based on what they determined was in those screenshots, so there was no bad faith involved or intended on their part. Due to the nature of the screenshots they had received, Epik's abuse department must've felt moved to act immediately.
 
The Gays From LA said:
During #DropKiwiFarms I myself was one of those gullible people donating 3 and 4 figures to Null right now. The other day during the MATI Livestream, someone immediately donated $10k to Null the very moment he posted the URL to the crowdfunder website on the screen. I was gonna donate 4 figures to Null during #DropKiwiFarms, not 5 figures like that MATI donor, but I can see where they're coming from. All these poor gullible people believe Null when he's telling them that he's fighting for free speech online. Fortunately Null himself proceeded to show his true nature to me, which is that of a gaslighting liar who thinks he can use and exploit people if he can get away with it, and thankfully I no longer believe anything Null says. I sincerely don't think that Null gives a fuck about free speech. I think he just likes the money, and especially the power that money gives him to threaten an ISP that he assumed was on his side. It's very telling that Null is threatening to sue an entity that until recently was on his side.


If they haven't removed the xeets since the exchange with Null then they were clearly not shitposting.
If it was just a misunderstanding due to a shitpost, why would Null continue to threaten Epik?
Null clearly thinks the xeets were serious, hence the legal threats.

Here's Epik's TOS, I have highlighted the parts that I suspect will be brought up during the lolsuit, if Null is dumb enough to file it:





Here's their Abuse policy:



Epik apparently concluded that the screenshots they had received violate at least one (probably more) subsection of section C of their TOS. Even if those screenshots aren't CP and the person in them truly was 19 as Null claims, Epik can still argue that they were erring on the side of caution based on what they determined was in those screenshots, so there was no bad faith involved or intended on their part. Due to the nature of the screenshots they had received, Epik's abuse department must've felt moved to act immediately.
Click to expand...
So Null is gonna leave off the internet forever and kengle takes over? I mean KF violated subsection C...
Hell doesn't KF have beastality on there as well?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top