During #DropKiwiFarms I myself was one of those gullible people donating 3 and 4 figures to Null right now. The other day during the MATI Livestream, someone immediately donated $10k to Null the very moment he posted the URL to the crowdfunder website on the screen. I was gonna donate 4 figures to Null during #DropKiwiFarms, not 5 figures like that MATI donor, but I can see where they're coming from. All these poor gullible people believe Null when he's telling them that he's fighting for free speech online. Fortunately Null himself proceeded to show his true nature to me, which is that of a gaslighting liar who thinks he can use and exploit people if he can get away with it, and thankfully I no longer believe anything Null says. I sincerely don't think that Null gives a fuck about free speech. I think he just likes the money, and especially the power that money gives him to threaten an ISP that he assumed was on his side. It's very telling that Null is threatening to sue an entity that until recently was on his side.
If they haven't removed the xeets since the exchange with Null then they were clearly not shitposting.
If it was just a misunderstanding due to a shitpost, why would Null continue to threaten Epik?
Null clearly thinks the xeets were serious, hence the legal threats.
Here's Epik's TOS, I have highlighted the parts that I suspect will be brought up during the lolsuit, if Null is dumb enough to file it:
Here's their Abuse policy:
Abuse Policy
In order to ensure that all abuse requests are investigated, please submit abuse report(s) at:
abuse[at]epik[dt]com
Please understand that we require evidence of the illegal activity prior to deactivation. Unfortunately, we cannot simply take reports at face value as there are often fake or inaccurate reports filed with us. Otherwise, please contact the host of the website who has control over the website content or the registrant of the domain directly.
If the complaint is regarding a UDRP or ICANN complaint, please email abuse@epik.com and we will respond to your email within the time frame specified.
Epik apparently concluded that the screenshots they had received violate at least one (probably more) subsection of section C of their TOS. Even if those screenshots aren't CP and the person in them truly was 19 as Null claims, Epik can still argue that they were erring on the side of caution based on what they determined was in those screenshots, so there was no bad faith involved or intended on their part. Due to the nature of the screenshots they had received, Epik's abuse department must've felt moved to act immediately.
Most websites and GFMs are some degree of scam IMHO, like many websites will ban you at the drop of a hat, no matter how much money you gave them. 
