Celebrities, public figures, current events, internet drama

Who can be a part of our community? All races, ethnicities, religions, gay or straight, cis or trans: We don't care. If you can rock with us: You are one of us. Kiwifarms may disable or restrict registration. We don't. We're here for you and always will be.

If you have a technical issue with Xenforo: Please post your request in the Town Square or the Talk to Staff (If you want more privacy) and one of us will check it out to address your concerns.Thank you for all your forum contributions (Owner - Onion Null).


The Search has been repaired.


Community Featured Submissions:

Kiwifarms Gossip & Slap Fights KF General 2.0

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
IMG_0206.jpeg
To the broomstick farms that complain about her making huge views on Vic and Asmongold? Her dog says otherwise.
 
View attachment 84840
A.I slop will never be the future, faggot.

Written AI has a brighter future than image AI. The written stuff can respond to you and ask questions but the """art""" always looks like ass and the computer is too stupid to figure out how to keep the original subject that you liked and draw it from a different angle. Even the best AI is completely flummoxed by commands like "higher shot, 3/4 in the frame."
 
View attachment 84840
A.I slop will never be the future, faggot.
I just see AI as another tech bubble like the other ones we saw in the past 30 years.

Speculative investors come in, they hype something up, it turns out the assets in question are worth less than what they are actually worth, and the market for said investments collapses.

We've seen this before with the Dot Com Bubble of the 1990's where Wall Street threw money at just about any company that opened a website for their business. They weren't wrong that the Internet would have a huge impact on the world but many of those investors at the time backed the wrong horses and eventually by the end of the 1990's, the Dot Com Bubble popped and many were left broke and without jobs. The Tech industry would eventually recover but that was a hard lesson for many to not blindly buy into hype just because something is new and shiny.

Then there is Crypto. I'm sure everyone that remembers the late-2010s probably remembers how prices for graphics cards skyrocketed because everyone was hyping up Crypto as the next big thing. Bitcoin skyrocketed in its value and Ethereum was creating new millionaires so everyone wanted to get in on the hype. Many people began to buy up graphics cards meant for gaming to mine their own crypto to become rich. It was a digital gold rush. But then the price for Bitcoin started to plummet and Etheruem went from being proof of work to proof of stake so suddenly the hype for crypto plummeted and many people found themselves selling off their mining equipment after the hype died out. Crypto is still around but the hype for it has died down as many know more about the reality of crypto investing.

So this brings me to AI. I'm going to paraphrase what Linus Torvalds (the creator of the Linux kernel) said about AI, it's 10 percent real world application and the other 90 percent is hype, hot air, and vaporware. AI as we know it is so hyped up as this big thing but hardly anyone asks the question of what real world applications that it's going to have in everyday life. So far, people haven't really grown fond of AI generated artwork because many see it as soulless and worthless. Gamers don't like AI because the fake frames being promised by hardware manufactures like nvidia don't live up to the hype and they still want you to pay and arm and a leg for their GPUs. I can list more examples. AI will be here to stay but the reality will set in on how AI will really impact our lives and the AI bubble that we see now will crash sooner or later.

There is some old wisdom that seems to be taken for granted. To paraphrase the legendary investor Warren Buffet, if you are going to invest in something then be fearful when everyone else is greedy and be greedy when everyone else is fearful so that you minimize the chances of you being burned by a bad investment.

The whole AI thing is mostly just blind hype. AI will be around long after the bubble has burst but AI will likely not live up to the hype as many people make it out to be now.
 
Last edited:
I just see AI as another tech bubble like the other ones we saw in the past 30 years.

Speculative investors come in, they hype something up, it turns out the assets in question are worth less than what they are actually worth, and the market for said investments collapses.

We've seen this before with the Dot Com Bubble of the 1990's where Wall Street threw money at just about any company that opened a website for their business. They weren't wrong that the Internet would have a huge impact on the world but many of those investors at the time backed the wrong horses and eventually by the end of the 1990's, the Dot Com Bubble popped and many were left broke and without jobs. The Tech industry would eventually recover but that was a hard lesson for many to not blindly buy into hype just because something is new and shiny.

Then there is Crypto. I'm sure everyone that remembers the late-2010s probably remembers how prices for graphics cards skyrocketed because everyone was hyping up Crypto as the next big thing. Bitcoin skyrocketed in its value and Ethereum was creating new millionaires so everyone wanted to get in on the hype. Many people began to buy up graphics cards meant for gaming to mine their own crypto to become rich. It was a digital gold rush. But then the price for Bitcoin started to plummet and Etheruem went from being proof of work to proof of stake so suddenly the hype for crypto plummeted and many people found themselves selling off their mining equipment after the hype died out. Crypto is still around but the hype for it has died down as many know more about the reality of crypto investing.

So this brings me to AI. I'm going to paraphrase what Linus Torvalds (the creator of the Linux kernel) said about AI, it's 10 percent real world application and the other 90 percent is hype, hot air, and vaporware. AI as we know it is so hyped up as this big thing but hardly anyone asks the question of what real world applications that it's going to have in everyday life. So far, people haven't really grown fond of AI generated artwork because many see it as soulless and worthless. Gamers don't like AI because the fake frames being promised by hardware manufactures like nvidia don't live up to the hype and they still want you to pay and arm and a leg for their GPUs. I can list more examples. AI will be here to stay but the reality will set in on how AI will really impact our lives and the AI bubble that we see now will crash sooner or later.

There is some old wisdom that seems to be taken for granted. To paraphrase the legendary investor Warren Buffet, if you are going to invest in something then be fearful when everyone else is greedy and be greedy when everyone else is fearful so that you minimize the chances of you being burned by a bad investment.

The whole AI thing is mostly just blind hype. AI will be around long after the bubble has burst but AI will likely not live up to the hype as many people make it out to be now.
The bottom line is this, it's just for shitposting and that's the reality of it.
 
The bottom line is this, it's just for shitposting and that's the reality of it.
And even then, new forms of shitposting will arrive.

I just see AI shitposting as the Advice Animals of this generation where you had a template set up for you (or you can add one yourself) and just add words using a meme generator that you could've found online back then (these old memes that looked like this as an example, I'll probably unlock old memories with this image alone).
Example-of-an-Advice-Dog-image-macro-the-meme-which-spawned-a-larger-category-of-meme.png

These kinds of memes from back in the day were made with the many meme generators you can find online and often for free. So the whole concept of using a computer to generate a meme for you is nothing new.

Using AI to generate a meme is just using an old 2010's era meme generator with extra steps. It's like reinventing the wheel. So you can make the argument that there is really nothing special about AI being used to generate memes because people were doing the more primitive equivalent of that back in the 2010's long before AI stepped into the picture.
 
Last edited:
And even then, new forms of shitposting will arrive.

I just see AI shitposting as the Advice Animals of this generation where you had a template set up for you (or you can add one yourself) and just add words using a meme generator that you could've found online back then (these old memes that looked like this as an example, I'll probably unlock old memories with this image alone).
View attachment 84904
These kinds of memes from back in the day were made with the many meme generators you can find online and often for free. So the whole concept of using a computer to generate a meme for you is nothing new.

Using AI to generate a meme is just using an old 2010's era meme generator with extra steps. It's like reinventing the wheel. So you can make the argument that there is really nothing special about AI being used to generate memes because people were doing the more primitive equivalent of that back in the 2010's long before AI stepped into the picture.
Yeah A.I shitposting is just a higher quality version of the memes that were profound back in the early 2010's. Of course the generation that'll only grow up as A.I as their source finder will only attest to A.I, plus there's the fact A.I can do all the heavy lifting for you.

fagger 1.PNG
fagger 2.PNG

What is with these slop posts, "If someone showed me this in a vaccum".
 
View attachment 84905View attachment 84906
What is with these slop posts, "If someone showed me this in a vaccum".
This kind of mindset isn't new and it goes back to the Youtube Skeptic days back when the Skeptics labeled anything they saw as Progressive as "SJW" (the term 'Social Justice Warrior' or SJW was used to describe Woke content back then).

Is Wokeness cringe? Yes it is. Does a work of media having some progressive themes make it Woke? Not really.

So back in the day, there was a Youtuber that went by the name of 'No Bullshit' who was one of those anti-SJW skeptics that were prevalent in the 2010's. However, part of the reason why people used to dunk on No Bullshit was his flawed argument that if something had a female lead then it must be "SJW" and therefore bad. It was pretty easy for left-wingers to tear apart his argument because you can easily point out plenty of fictional works with female leads that are not SJW (or not Woke if you prefer).

So this brings me to Wokeness we see today. Does a work of fiction with some progressive themes make it Woke? The answer is simply no. I just think this is a classic case of Rightoids confusing artistic merit with propaganda.

The 2023 animated series Velma (an adult sitcom based on the Scooby Doo series) is the definition of Woke as the whole show is designed to be propaganda that is meant to sell far-left progressive ideals and preaches that you're a bad person if you don't adopt these ideals. Velma was created by a spiteful person that wanted to "Own the Chuds" by creating a bastardized version of Scooby Doo filled to the brim with progressive propaganda. So it's safe to say that Velma is Woke.

Now let's look at something that isn't Woke. The hit crime drama series Breaking Bad is beloved by many and is considered to be one of the greatest things to happen on television. The show has a canonically gay character named Gustavo Fring, a ruthless drug lord that runs a fried chicken restaurant chain and he uses his legal business as a front to sell potent methamphetamine of the best quality in the streets. Gus Fring is gay but that doesn't make Breaking Bad a bad show nor does it make it Woke. The show is not selling people LGBT propaganda. The whole point of Breaking Bad is to show how there are no winners in the criminal underworld and everyone involved gets negatively affected (losing loved ones, being forced to run from the law and live in fear, ending up in prison, or ending up dead). Breaking Bad having a gay character does not make the show Woke and the show does a good job to show the viewer why Gustavo Fring is a horrible person and you should not be like him; Gus Fring is an evil fictional character that just so happens to be gay and Breaking Bad has plenty of evil heterosexual characters that shows the viewer that evil comes from all kinds of backgrounds.

So the point I'm making here is that just because a piece of fiction has some progressive themes does not make it Woke. All Woke content is progressive but not every work of fiction that has progressive themes is Woke.

It really does feel like being in the early-2010's again with Rightoids making the same dumbass arguments that lead to the rise of Breadtube later on.
 
Last edited:
Kiwifarms user StrangerMe, who is very likely an alt account of banned user Blav, takes a particularly kind of glee in the "brutal molestation" of streamer Steven "Destiny" Bonnell when he was a child. Other users continue to take his lead and mock Destiny for being molested as a child. These are the sick creeps Josh welcomes on his website so long as it's against people he despises.
View attachment 84343View attachment 84344View attachment 84345View attachment 84346View attachment 84347View attachment 84348View attachment 84349View attachment 84350View attachment 84351View attachment 84352View attachment 84353View attachment 84354View attachment 84355View attachment 84356View attachment 84357View attachment 84358View attachment 84359View attachment 84362View attachment 84363View attachment 84364View attachment 84365View attachment 84366View attachment 84367View attachment 84368View attachment 84369View attachment 84370View attachment 84371View attachment 84372View attachment 84373View attachment 84374View attachment 84375
I was a little sympathetic to Blav at first when he was banned, but all these comments are indefensible and just as pedophilic as Destiny. Who knows if Josh is just dumb and looking the other way because he realized Blav was right about Destiny all along or if he just somehow missing all these pro-child molestation comments. Lidl is also suspiciously absent from the thread. We all know none of these comments would fly if they were making fun of a women for being molested.
kiwicringe 28.pngkiwicringe 27.pngkiwicringe 26.pngkiwicringe 25.pngkiwicringe 24.pngkiwicringe 23.pngkiwicringe 22.pngkiwicringe 21.pngkiwicringe 20.pngkiwicringe 19.pngkiwicringe 18.pngkiwicringe 17.pngkiwicringe 16.pngkiwicringe 15.pngkiwicringe 14.pngkiwicringe 13.pngkiwicringe 12.pngkiwicringe 11.pngkiwicringe 10.pngkiwicringe 9.pngkiwicringe 8.pngkiwicringe 7.pngkiwicringe 6.pngkiwicringe 5.pngkiwicringe 4.pngkiwicringe 3.pngkiwicringe 2.pngkiwicringe 1.png
 
I was a little sympathetic to Blav at first when he was banned, but all these comments are indefensible and just as pedophilic as Destiny. Who knows if Josh is just dumb and looking the other way because he realized Blav was right about Destiny all along or if he just somehow missing all these pro-child molestation comments. Lidl is also suspiciously absent from the thread. We all know none of these comments would fly if they were making fun of a women for being molested.
View attachment 84914View attachment 84915View attachment 84916View attachment 84917View attachment 84918View attachment 84919View attachment 84920View attachment 84921View attachment 84922View attachment 84923View attachment 84924View attachment 84925View attachment 84926View attachment 84927View attachment 84928View attachment 84929View attachment 84930View attachment 84931View attachment 84932View attachment 84933View attachment 84934View attachment 84935View attachment 84936View attachment 84937View attachment 84938View attachment 84939View attachment 84940View attachment 84941
How is there so goddamn many fucking posts of this shit? Also nice to see that faggot draggs in this.
 
Back
Top