• Welcome to Onionfarms. All races, ethnicities, religions. Gay, straight, bisexual. CIS or trans. It makes no difference to us. If you can rock with us, you are one of us. We are here for you and always will be.

    Josh the fatty may ban you for weight loss advice or an anime avatar. Kengle the fatty won't and never will.

Kiwifarms Gossip & Slap Fights KF General 2.0

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Kiwifarms users appear to stand against doxing of public, government employees now. (It's just people real names and government email addresses btw.)
Screenshot_20250308_122944_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Kiwifarms users appear to stand against doxing of public, government employees now. (It's just people real names and government email addresses btw.)
View attachment 85811
The next post, another user posted the dox uncensored, throwing the government under the bus. Man, I can't wait for these people to get arrested for illegal doxxing of government people. Who will win in the fight? Random Twitter users or big bad government?
 
The next post, another user posted the dox uncensored, throwing the government under the bus. Man, I can't wait for these people to get arrested for illegal doxxing of government people. Who will win in the fight? Random Twitter users or big bad government?
Can’t the government trace that shit in a second?
 
Kiwifarms users appear to stand against doxing of public, government employees now. (It's just people real names and government email addresses btw.)
View attachment 85811
Kiwi Farms is not against the doxing of public government officials, Kiwi Farms is against the potential legislation that can come from this.

Currently doxing isn't seen as a federal offense (there's no federal laws that addresses doxing in of itself) but some states both blue and red leaning (like California and Missouri) have already made doxing a crime (it's either seen as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the state). This may finally motivate the federal government to try to pass legislation that addresses the act of doxing.

But some midwit would say, "But isn't doxing free speech?" While publicly available information is protected by the First Amendment, there's still some things that are not seen as protected speech such as stalking, trespassing, vandalism, death threats, swatting and other things that can be seen as malicious behavior or intent (criminal harassment as far to my knowledge has never been seen as protected speech in American legal history).

Most importantly, the federal government can make the argument against doxing with malicious intent of any kind by pulling out the classic 'National Security' card just like what they did with the Tiktok ban law (where the Supreme Court sided with the federal government in the Tiktok ban case and I imagine the Supreme Court won't object to legislation that targets some forms of malicious behavior online that can be seen as a national security risk).

What Kiwi Farms (and other online communities just like them) really fears is that they may be labeled as enemies of the state soon should such legislation becomes reality. It doesn't help that Elon Musk (the head of DOGE) has put it on record that he doesn't consider doxing as free speech ever since he bought out Twitter; so doxing is probably next on the chopping block for the American government sooner or later. If such a thing were to happen where an anti-doxing bill were to become law, then websites like Kiwi Farms may be forced to either take down said content related to real life individuals (in this case the lolcows being featured) or the websites in question have to shut down due to the legal liabilities.
 
Last edited:
Kiwi Farms is not against the doxing of public government officials, Kiwi Farms is against the potential legislation that can come from this.

Currently doxing isn't seen as a federal offense (there's no federal laws that addresses doxing in of itself) but some states both blue and red leaning (like California and Missouri) have already made doxing a crime (it's either seen as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the state). This may finally motivate the federal government to try to pass legislation that addresses the act of doxing.

But some midwit would say, "But isn't doxing free speech?" While publicly available information is protected by the First Amendment, there's still some things that are not seen as protected speech such as stalking, trespassing, vandalism, death threats, swatting and other things that can be seen as malicious behavior or intent (criminal harassment as far to my knowledge has never been seen as protected speech in American legal history).

Most importantly, the federal government can make the argument against doxing with malicious intent of any kind by pulling out the classic 'National Security' card just like what they did with the Tiktok ban law (where the Supreme Court sided with the federal government in the Tiktok ban case and I imagine the Supreme Court won't object to legislation that targets some forms of malicious behavior online that can be seen as a national security risk).

What Kiwi Farms (and other online communities just like them) really fears is that they may be labeled as enemies of the state soon should such legislation becomes reality. It doesn't help that Elon Musk (the head of DOGE) has put it on record that he doesn't consider doxing as free speech ever since he bought out Twitter; so doxing is probably next on the chopping block for the American government sooner or later. If such a thing were to happen where an anti-doxing bill were to become law, then websites like Kiwi Farms may be forced to either take down said content related to real life individuals (in this case the lolcows being featured) or the websites in question have to shut down due to the legal liabilities.
Given Null makes enemies with the Government he would most likely get fucked. The world knows who he is. Only a matter of time before he tries to pull a Bin Laden. Also, his attacks on Lolicons will also get him into trouble as they are targeting people from that community as well. Null is toast!
 
Kiwi Farms is not against the doxing of public government officials, Kiwi Farms is against the potential legislation that can come from this.

Currently doxing isn't seen as a federal offense (there's no federal laws that addresses doxing in of itself) but some states both blue and red leaning (like California and Missouri) have already made doxing a crime (it's either seen as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the state). This may finally motivate the federal government to try to pass legislation that addresses the act of doxing.

But some midwit would say, "But isn't doxing free speech?" While publicly available information is protected by the First Amendment, there's still some things that are not seen as protected speech such as stalking, trespassing, vandalism, death threats, swatting and other things that can be seen as malicious behavior or intent (criminal harassment as far to my knowledge has never been seen as protected speech in American legal history).

Most importantly, the federal government can make the argument against doxing with malicious intent of any kind by pulling out the classic 'National Security' card just like what they did with the Tiktok ban law (where the Supreme Court sided with the federal government in the Tiktok ban case and I imagine the Supreme Court won't object to legislation that targets some forms of malicious behavior online that can be seen as a national security risk).

What Kiwi Farms (and other online communities just like them) really fears is that they may be labeled as enemies of the state soon should such legislation becomes reality. It doesn't help that Elon Musk (the head of DOGE) has put it on record that he doesn't consider doxing as free speech ever since he bought out Twitter; so doxing is probably next on the chopping block for the American government sooner or later. If such a thing were to happen where an anti-doxing bill were to become law, then websites like Kiwi Farms may be forced to either take down said content related to real life individuals (in this case the lolcows being featured) or the websites in question have to shut down due to the legal liabilities.

Strict laws against doxxing wouldn't just affect Kiwi Farms. I imagine Soyjak and Doxbin would also be affected.
 
Can’t the government trace that shit in a second?
They can. You shouldn't mess with them. Let alone allow their emails to be used for gay porn spam. It starts with jokes but shit gets serious if you harm someone. They better be lucky to have strong VPNs because they're coming for them.
i wonder how many clowns from bluesky will be arrested after messing around with government emails. probably a lot
 
They can. You shouldn't mess with them. Let alone allow their emails to be used for gay porn spam. It starts with jokes but shit gets serious if you harm someone. They better be lucky to have strong VPNs because they're coming for them.
VPNs won't protect someone if the feds are coming after them.

So unless someone is running a machine with TailsOS installed on a USB drive and connect to the Internet using the Tor browser while being connected to the Internet using Starbucks or McDonald's Wifi with a long-range Wifi receiver antenna and doing this inside an Amish person's house; it doesn't take much for the feds to find someone should they not practice impeccable OPSEC.

Rarely do the feds have to actually engage in some CSI Miami shit and it's pretty easy for the feds to figure out who did it. Usually the feds request a VPN service to hand over any banking information to identify a suspect and then they put the dots together to see what is really going on. Most VPN services do keep logs of user activity and they usually require a customer to hand over their real world banking details to pay for their VPN services, there's only a handful of VPN services based in countries that are not part of the Five Eyes of Surveillance and allows people to pay in crypto for more anonymous billing (such as Bitcoin and Monero).

This doesn't mean VPNs are useless (they do have their uses), this means that if someone is going to become a whistleblower then it's really dumb to use a VPN when dealing with the glowies because this is a game that they're far less likely to win as governments like the United States have billions in taxpayer money at their disposal to find someone.

So I doubt anyone using the personal information of the DOGE employees for malicious purposes have good OPSEC and I'm sure we'll see the Trump administration and the federal government come up with some proposed legislation on how to address online privacy and how to address doxing for that matter. Obviously the American glowies are going to see the doxing of DOGE employees as a serious national security risk so expect something to happen soon where the government may start labeling doxing as a threat to national security or something.
 
Last edited:
VPNs won't protect someone if the feds are coming after them.

So unless someone is running a machine with TailsOS installed on a USB drive and connect to the Internet using the Tor browser while being connected to the Internet using Starbucks or McDonald's Wifi with a long-range Wifi receiver antenna and doing this inside an Amish person's house; it doesn't take much for the feds to find someone should they not practice impeccable OPSEC.

Rarely do the feds have to actually engage in some CSI Miami shit and it's pretty easy for the feds to figure out who did it. Usually the feds request a VPN service to hand over any banking information to identify a suspect and then they put the dots together to see what is really going on. Most VPN services do keep logs of user activity and they usually require a customer to hand over their real world banking details to pay for their VPN services, there's only a handful of VPN services based in countries that are not part of the Five Eyes of Surveillance and allows people to pay in crypto for more anonymous billing (such as Bitcoin and Monero).

This doesn't mean VPNs are useless (they do have their uses), this means that if someone is going to become a whistleblower then it's really dumb to use a VPN when dealing with the glowies because this is a game that they're far less likely to win as governments like the United States have billions in taxpayer money at their disposal to find someone.

So I doubt anyone using the personal information of the DOGE employees for malicious purposes have good OPSEC and I'm sure we'll see the Trump administration and the federal government come up with some proposed legislation on how to address online privacy and how to address doxing for that matter. Obviously the American glowies are going to see the doxing of DOGE employees as a serious national security risk so expect something to happen soon where the government may start labeling doxing as a threat to national security or something.
indeed my dude
 
Kiwi Farms forget that there are exceptions to this when it comes to women taking on men's roles.

When the European colonizers tried to conquer the Amazon rainforest, they got their asses kicked a lot as they were meet with fierce resistance from the indigenous warrior women (they were given the nickname the Amazons by the conquistadors because they fought fiercely like the Amazons in Greek mythology).

During World War 2, the Soviet Union was the only allied nation with an organized military that allowed women to serve in the front lines. One notable Soviet war hero was Lyudmila Pavlichenko where she was a sniper for the Red Army and she is credited to have 309 confirmed kills to her name during her time on the Eastern Front (although it should be noted that some of her feats may have been exaggerated for Soviet propaganda). Nevertheless, Lyudmila Pavlichenko killed a lot of Nazis during her military career.

Kiwi Farms is too lazy to read a history book.
 
Last edited:
Kiwi Farms forget that there are exceptions to this when it comes to women taking on men's roles.

When the European colonizers tried to conquer the Amazon rainforest, they got their asses kicked a lot as they were meet with fierce resistance from the indigenous warrior women (they were given the nickname the Amazons by the conquistadors because they fought fiercely like the Amazons in Greek mythology).

During World War 2, the Soviet Union was the only allied nation with an organized military that allowed women to serve in the front lines. One notable Soviet war hero was Lyudmila Pavlichenko where she was a sniper for the Red Army and she is credited to have 309 confirmed kills to her name during her time on the Eastern Front (although it should be noted that some of her feats may have been exaggerated for Soviet propaganda). Nevertheless, Lyudmila Pavlichenko killed a lot of Nazis during her military career.

Kiwi Farms is too lazy to read a history book.
Indeed they are very lazy as fuck.
 
Back
Top