All Races, ethnicities, religions. Gay or straight, cis or trans: We don't care. If you can rock with us: You are one of us

Community Featured Submissions 🧅
Tier 1:
Tier 2:
January 7, 2025: Nollywood actress, Toyin Abraham, has a meltdown over someone recording her new movie in a cinema
January 7, 2025: Social media personality and self-acclaimed therapist, Blessing Okoro, aka Blessing CEO, maintains there is nothing wrong with a therapist dating a client

Suggestion Box

OnionNull said:
Rainbow Emoji (Optimistic) Added.
Click to expand...
Optimistic

On a serious note the two sub-forums under the religious celbrities subforum should be made into mega threads in the original sub-forum. I didn't even notice they were their since you have to click on the little arrow for them to show up.
 
Last edited:
Can we have something similar to the prospering ground where we post the thread first before they are approved? Especially since anyone under 20,000 is supposed to be greenlit by OnionNull.
 
Last edited:
bogъ said:
Can we have something similar to the prospering ground where we post OP fist before they are approved? Especially since anyone under 20,000 is supposed to be greenlit by OnionNull.
Click to expand...
SIGSEGV was of the opinion that 20K in and of itself may not give a complete picture of underrated lolcows. I get the impression that him and some of the other members are saying that we should have a more holistic approach when it comes to deciding whether a thread would be viable. In other words, aside from the numbers, how much of an impact has that person had on internet culture per se?
 
OnionNull said:
SIGSEGV was of the opinion that 20K in and of itself may not give a complete picture of underrated lolcows. I get the impression that him and some of the other members are saying that we should have a more holistic approach when it comes to deciding whether a thread would be viable. In other words, aside from the numbers, how much of an impact has that person had on internet culture per se?
Click to expand...
It's not only about their impact on internet culture. The questions to ask are:
  • Is this person funny?
  • Is there enough material to discuss so that the thread does not stagnate?
  • Is this person likely to continue generating funny content?
 
OnionNull said:
SIGSEGV was of the opinion that 20K in and of itself may not give a complete picture of underrated lolcows. I get the impression that him and some of the other members are saying that we should have a more holistic approach when it comes to deciding whether a thread would be viable. In other words, aside from the numbers, how much of an impact has that person had on internet culture per se?
Click to expand...
Idk, I just thought you guys came to the agreement that anyone below 20k had to be greenlit because of the problems it could cause. That's the only reason I was asking for one.

Followers seems pretty arbitrary when it comes to Lolcows but I understand why you would be hesitant to make threads on people who are not public figures.
 
So how do you plan to get more users? Will you offer people who wish to support this place anything?
 
Donations at this point are not necessary. The Xenforo license, the Themehouse license, my webhosting and whatever else I need comes out of my own pocket. Will I need donations in the future? I don't have the answer to that but I would hope the answer would be no. As far as gaining more users to sign up, I have advertised on 8kun before. The staff were terrific in this regards. However, the best thing in terms of increasing the user base is natural growth
bogъ said:
Idk, I just thought you guys came to the agreement that anyone below 20k had to be greenlit because of the problems it could cause. That's the only reason I was asking for one.

Followers seems pretty arbitrary when it comes to Lolcows but I understand why you would be hesitant to make threads on people who are not public figures.
Click to expand...
Celebrities such as Justin Bieber or the Kardashians are used to being in the spotlight. They are "Kiwifarmed" everyday in a manner of speaking. They've earned their chops. Kim Kardashian probably wouldn't care about a thread on Kiwifarms or Onionfarms. The same simply isn't true about a private citizen who gets a spotlight shined in their face. They clam up. Public figures are somewhere in between depending on how much they are in the public spotlight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top