Null is going to have a heart attack again
Net Neutrality has always been a lefty grift for a variety of reasons and here is why.
Let's say an ISP like Comcast decides to slow down people's Internet speeds and block/throttle content and services that an ISP may object to that wasn't from a court order for those that are paying for a basic package (because of any money-related reasons or political reasons); in that case they would lose customers to an ISP that aren't doing those things.
Most importantly, an ISP throttling or blocking content can easily be bypassed with an encrypted proxy (such as NextDNS) a good VPN (like Mullvlad), or the Tor browser.
It would also be a horrible look for any American ISP to act as a gatekeeper for information because of the current political climate (everyone talks about Big Tech censoring the Internet and it be a huge mistake for the ISPs to engage in the same shenanigans that companies like Alphabet Inc (Google and Youtube) and Apple already engage in).
Just because the Republicans oppose Net Neutrality does not mean they won't target the ISPs should American ISPs decide to throttle and block content that appeals to their side (it's why people like Trump has proposed an Internet Bill of Rights for online platforms as far as freedom of speech and freedom of expression goes) and it's also very easy for some Elon Musk-type egomaniac entrepreneur to challenge the big ISPs. Don't believe me? Look what happened to AOL because they've foolishly choose to stick with dial-up Internet while the other ISPs embraced cable and DSL Internet which were much more efficient and faster than dial-up at the time (and now there is a race for fiber optic because that is much faster than DSL and cable Internet).
So if the big American ISPs decide to be dicks, there goes their big market share over the Internet when new players show up.
The free market usually takes care of these things anyway.