Here's why I think it's wrong for Null to describe Rekieta as a
"Sekturite", claiming that Rekieta is dependent on the Sektur for views and content, and that Rekieta somehow "betrayed" that community by his lifestyle switch with his wife, who appears to be a pervert herself who supports and is into this lifestyle change. Null insisted that Rekieta was the one roping along his unwilling wife into his descent towards drunken debauchery, but now we know that she herself is a 100% consenting exhibitionist. Anyway, below you will see how Null is inflating the relevance of "the Sektur" in what constitutes the totality of Rekieta's audience.
Here is Rekieta's video on the day Johnny Depp took the stand, with 1 million views:
Another video reacting to Depp with almost a million views:
Another Depp Livestream with two other Youtube lawyers waiting for the decision, 1.1 million views:
This 3 minute clip from the Heard/Depp case has 2,2 million views:
This 2 minute clip of Rekieta reacting to the Depp/Heard case has 1.8 million views:
There are more of these short clips of Rekieta reacting to Depp/Heard that have between 1 and 2 million views each.
Lastly, Rekieta didn't discover the Heard/Depp case through Null or "the Sektur" but simply through another Youtuber who was already covering the case, ThatUmbrella guy:
These videos all plainly show that Rekieta's main and most lucrative audience is definitely not "the Sektur" or KiwiFarmers, but rather mainstream normies who enjoy the edutainment of Youtube lawyers reacting to and lawsplaining Big Cases, a celebrity lolsuit, in an accessible and fun way. Rekieta still has an audience, even and despite Null going of his way to turn "the Sektur" against him, because of these mainstream normies who don't give a shit that the fundamentalist moral police from "the Sektur" has rejected him and feels betrayed by his tradcath LARP all these years.