All Races, ethnicities, religions. Gay or straight, cis or trans: We don't care. If you can rock with us: You are one of us


Community Featured Submissions 🧅
Tier 1:
Tier 2:
January 7, 2025: Nollywood actress, Toyin Abraham, has a meltdown over someone recording her new movie in a cinema
January 7, 2025: Social media personality and self-acclaimed therapist, Blessing Okoro, aka Blessing CEO, maintains there is nothing wrong with a therapist dating a client
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
If you are also wondering what Josh is hoping for in this as a net-positive. There is a small chance SCOTUS will side with Joshs belief that Copywrite laws are bad and need to be verified beforehand.

Josh hopes they just make it to where you gotta have federally approved proof of Copywrite before dragging people to court. Thats it. Thats all he wants. Itll stop Greer from refiling over and over again against josh for DMCA of his Book and Music and Posts. Thats as far as Josh here has thought about in this epic dumbass move.
 
I think you are not really explaining the gravity of this situation so I will.

Joshua connor Moon is so mad at a drooling taylor swift stalker that he is now attempting to get the United States Supreme Court to universally change and/or nullify DMCA as it exists today. Specifically this
View attachment 46967

View attachment 46968

For those that do not understand. Josh is attempting to get SCOTUS to redefine Copywrite takedowns like the ones used on Youtube to mean that if you file one you immediately have to get a some type of legal entity to say its Copywrite before you can file a DMCA and if you share copywrited material that you are to be considered a “third party” and not pursued by this new federally regulated DMCA that Josh is asking for. Basically he wants to make it to where anyone can copywrite infringe without any takedowns until the complaintant goes to a Federal Judge with there own money first to prove its Copywrite and then they can file a DMCA with the judgement alone. Also even if this happens anyone who is not the guy the copywrite holder dragged to a federal court, not civil, can still post the material without any repercussion and the Holder will be forced to have to manually press charges, not civil sue, on each person and take then to federal court to make them stop as a “Third Party”.

This may sound confusing and it is but the overall change or nullification would make you posting anything from like a screenshot of someone elses to actual copywrited material like a Movie on equal grounds and this would make anyone who can file a DMCA have to get a court order that says they own X and then they can literally put anyone in jail to await a federally appointed criminal trial to judge whether or not you stole or posted that Copywrite. You would not have a civil suit anymore into DMCA infringement itd just be straight to jail.

If this goes the way josh expects this would radically alter or even nullify Section 230 from the United States and make websites responsible for all copywrited material if a Copywrite Holder decided to drag in an entire website instead of a poster. Meaning all website owners would be directly responsible to handle DMCAs or even accusations of copyright infringement as if they themselves are on Trial.

Josh is 1000% aware of this and openly posted this little Gem admitting that No, he isnt going to go to SCOTUS and demand this. He is going to send some shitty Kiwifarms Lawyer and if they fuck it up he and his site will blame them for making the internet worse for everyone

View attachment 46972

If they fuck up and make Fair Use a Death Penalty blame the EFF, I asked them for help first”

Drink that in @Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt josh here is gambling in hopes that SCOTUS doesnt put you on death row if you run any site that publishes anything somebody writes and claims is there copyrighted work :story:
I also want to point out that if Josh get’s his way then this would Dramatically change how Fair Use is as we know it and that would be left up to the Copyright Holder to decide as you would be considered a Third Party to the events unfolding if you are not the original person that had this DMCA set against. You are a guy sharing that dispute or that material from the perspective of Fair Use itself. I.E. a youtuber commenting over copywrited material may be considered liable for criminal charges in this argument josh is making rather then a dispute between fair use and copywrite itself due to the Holder getting the Federal Government to give them essentially a Mock Warrant to slap anyone with they feel is violating there work.

Again, Josh is 100% aware of this and knows of this Court Ruling that SCOTUS is known for. Its exactly what he filed in his letter.

Review on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. A petition for a writ of certiorari will be granted only for compelling reasons. The following, although neither controlling nor fully measuring the Court's discretion, indicate the character of the reasons the Court considers:
  • (a) a United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matter; has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by a state court of last resort; or has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power;
  • (b) a state court of last resort has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the decision of another state court of last resort or of a United States court of appeals;
  • (c) a state court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court.
A petition for a writ of certiorari is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of erroneous factual findings or the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law.
If you are also wondering what Josh is hoping for in this as a net-positive. There is a small chance SCOTUS will side with Joshs belief that Copywrite laws are bad and need to be verified beforehand.

Josh hopes they just make it to where you gotta have federally approved proof of Copywrite before dragging people to court. Thats it. Thats all he wants. Itll stop Greer from refiling over and over again against josh for DMCA of his Book and Music and Posts. Thats as far as Josh here has thought about in this epic dumbass move.
not even like minutes later and my image here
1709280889568-png.46962

presenting, my latest masterpiece of image editing about jewsh:
View attachment 46962
continue to age like fine wine. good lord, josh, you never learn, do you?
 
not even like minutes later and my image here
1709280889568-png.46962

continue to age like fine wine. good lord, josh, you never learn, do you?
so to give a understanding of this a little bit better I’ll give you an example.

Currently the way DMCA and copywrite works in the US is like this.

You are a Company with a copywrite claim. You will have to submit a takedown notice with the website owner. By Law, the owner does not have to deal with it unless the owner is the one being accused. So what normally happens is that a website may temporarily takedown that alleged Copywrited work and inform the person who broke this DMCA that he must handle his affairs before re-submitting.

This is how Youtube Works. They just “pass it along”

If the person decides to fight you on this itll be in a civil matter over Fair Use and Copywrite where a Judge will hear your sides and make a decision. If the person is found breaking DMCA they are usually fined and told never to copywrite infringe again or else. If you are found wrong and its Fair Use you pay the court fees and may be at fault for emotional or financial damages to the accused.

Normally companies like Nintendo and Movie publishers do not pursue DMCA unless its a guarantee win for them and by win I mean brutally winning and demanding huge fines or punishment.

However for smaller disputes its seen as a simple fee and a warning. Most of it is handled by a civil court unless the infringement leads into trafficking goods etc.


What Josh wants is this

You as a company see someone posting your content. You FIRST take all that information to a federal court and show them you own that work 100%. The judge will grant you some kind of federal paperwork that says you are the owner and the government acknowledges it. Than you go to that guy with this new court appointment and the website its on and basically say “the US government agrees with me. Comply or else”. If Fair Use is cited itd be taken to a criminal courthouse and left up to a criminal judge to decide that. If you win, that guy may face prison time or probation and fines and programs to make sure he understands how copywrite works. However that person citing fair use will have to argue against you and the government instead of just you and him in a civil court.

It absolutely would change how 230 and fair use operate. Its extremely retarded. Josh believes by having a system like this itd make people that are not multi-million dollar corporations extremely wary of filing DMCA and make people stop abusing false DMCA. So the little guy gets no representation if they actually are experiencing copywrite infringement because the time and money itd cost someone for a federal court before even filing the DMCA would be too long and too expensive.
 
Last edited:
so to give a understanding of this a little bit better I’ll give you an example.

Currently the way DMCA and copywrite works in the US is like this.

You are a Company with a copywrite claim. You will have to submit a takedown notice with the website owner. By Law, the owner does not have to deal with it unless the owner is the one being accused. So what normally happens is that a website may temporarily takedown that alleged Copywrited work and inform the person who broke this DMCA that he must handle his affairs before re-submitting. ...submitting.

This is how Youtube Works. They just “pass it along”

If the person decides to fight you on this itll be in a civil matter over Fair Use and Copywrite where a Judge will hear your sides and make a decision. If the person is found breaking DMCA they are usually fined and told never to copywrite infringe again or else. If you are found wrong and its Fair Use you pay the court fees and may be at fault for emotional or financial damages to the accused.

Normally companies like Nintendo and Movie publishers do not pursue DMCA unless its a guarantee win for them and by win I mean brutally winning and demanding huge fines or punishment.

However for smaller disputes its seen as a simple fee and a warning. Most of it is handled by a civil court unless the infringement leads into trafficking goods etc.


What Josh wants is this

You as a company see someone posting your content. You take all that information to a federal court and show them you own that work 100%. The judge will grant you some kind of federal paperwork that says you are the owner and the government acknowledges it. Than you go to that guy with this new court appointment and the website its on and basically say “the US government agrees with me. Comply or else”. If Fair Use is cited itd be taken to a criminal courthouse and left up to a criminal judge to decide that. If you win, that guy may face prison time or probation and fines and programs to make sure he understands how copywrite works. However that person citing fair use will have to argue against you and the government instead of just you and him in a civil court.

It absolutely would change how 230 and fair use operate. Its extremely retarded
Maybe what Josh wants is dropping more soap on his kiwi buddies
 
Maybe what Josh wants is dropping more soap on his kiwi buddies
I generally see josh as a lolcow retard who’s narcissistic destructive behavior since the days of Moot denying him 4chan Staff is just what it is but this fucking guy is attempting to disrupt everyones internet time over a petty squabble between a Guy drooling over Taylor Swift and a guy running a gossip website and pretending its some kind of historical achievement. Josh needs a padded cell to stop himself from ruining things with his Opposition Defiance Disorder more so than ever before. Hes a walking talking pizza loving anti-fun ruiner. His delusions that hes gonna be in the Supreme Court House talking to someone like John G Roberts or Clarence Thomas about fucking lolcows and his problems he creates triggers me immensely
 
Last edited:
kiwifarms shutting down for good speedrun fucking when? the fact that jewsh and his army or mindless cocksucker drones aren't fully aware that this plan will just backfire on the farms so fucking hard is hilarious :story:
Hes so excited to sit in the supreme courthouse he is looking at ties to wear that lolcows wear :ackshually:
IMG_1668.jpeg


And people are now memeing what essentially josh is trying to do to the entirety of the internet’s Fair Use and Section 230 over Russel fucking Greer

IMG_1670.jpeg

IMG_1666.png


Yes Josh just Poke the government branch that decides how hard a court and its lawmakers can and will fuck you.
 
I generally see josh as a lolcow retard who’s narcissistic destructive behavior since the days of Moot denying him 4chan Staff is just what it is but this fucking guy is attempting to disrupt everyones internet time over a petty squabble between a Guy drooling over Taylor Swift and a guy running a gossip website and pretending its some kind of historical achievement. Josh needs a padded cell to stop himself from ruining things with his Opposition Defiance Disorder more so than ever before. Hes a walking talking pizza loving anti-fun ruiner. His delusions that hes gonna be in the Supreme Court House talking to someone like John G Roberts or Clarence Thomas about fucking lolcows and his problems he creates triggers me immensely
Can't Josh essentially go to Jail for pulling this bullshit?
 
Can't Josh essentially go to Jail for pulling this bullshit?
Anyone can submit a change to a law or a redefinition of a precedent set in court to SCOTUS. They get them all year long but only 1% ever get taken to task by SCOTUS. What this does show is that Josh is grossly overstepping in his fucking lane and trying to redefine something that affects literally every single user and conglomerate entity on the internet. Not just his gay lolcow website.

His narcissism copium is in overdrive all because Russel Greer is trolling josh by repeatedly dragging him to court. Hes being a turbo faggot and pissing in everyones cereal to own the alog Greer.
 
Hes so excited to sit in the supreme courthouse he is looking at ties to wear that lolcows wear :ackshually:
View attachment 46974

And people are now memeing what essentially josh is trying to do to the entirety of the internet’s Fair Use and Section 230 over Russel fucking Greer

View attachment 46975

View attachment 46976

Yes Josh just Poke the government branch that decides how hard a court and its lawmakers can and will fuck you.
Yes Josh go for the gold and don't forget a buccee bow tie :haha:

Buccee bowties.jpg
 
Anyone can submit a change to a law or a redefinition of a precedent set in court to SCOTUS. They get them all year long but only 1% ever get taken to task by SCOTUS. What this does show is that Josh is grossly overstepping in his fucking lane and trying to redefine something that affects literally every single user and conglomerate entity on the internet. Not just his gay lolcow website. ...website.

His narcissism copium is in overdrive all because Russel Greer is trolling josh by repeatedly dragging him to court. Hes being a turbo faggot and pissing in everyones cereal to own the alog Greer.
It's so fucking weird because Josh's site is LITERALLY FUCKING dedicated to fucking alogging
 
Yes Josh go for the gold and don't forget a buccee bow tie :haha:

View attachment 46995
This fucking thread is a gold mine. Kiwitards are suddenly becoming aware that what Josh has done is cause extreme amounts of problems for how people interact with one another on the internet and question how social media itself can operate if Josh gets what he wants :story:

IMG_1699.jpeg


Other Kiwi dumbasses are also realizing that the Legal Fund of $150,000 raised most likely went to josh doing this shit with SCOTUS and not actually to fight against Epik LLC :story::story::story:
IMG_1697.jpeg


Josh is prepping some serious ban hammering in this thread I can feel it in my bones
 
This fucking thread is a gold mine. Kiwitards are suddenly becoming aware that what Josh has done is cause extreme amounts of problems for how people interact with one another on the internet and question how social media itself can operate if Josh gets what he wants :story:

View attachment 46999

Other Kiwi dumbasses are also realizing that the Legal Fund of $150,000 raised most likely went to josh doing this shit with SCOTUS and not actually to fight against Epik LLC :story::story::story:
View attachment 46998

Josh is prepping some serious ban hammering in this thread I can feel it in my bones
Not a fucking peep out of Null about the Epik suit. I'll say it again for any Kiwis listening NO FUCKING REFUNDS SUCKER.
 
Not a fucking peep out of Null about the Epik suit. I'll say it again for any Kiwis listening NO FUCKING REFUNDS SUCKER.
This thread is just a gift lmao

People are now questioning Josh’s alleged updated Dox info and wondering if its been memoryholed

IMG_1701.jpeg


As people start putting two and two together we are now dredging up revisiting fucking NAPSTER decision to reverse it and redo it hooolllllyyyyy shit Josh what are you DOING pizzaboi? :story:

IMG_1704.jpeg

IMG_1703.jpeg
 
Back
Top