Celebrities, public figures, current events, internet drama

Who can be a part of our community? All races, ethnicities, religions, gay or straight, cis or trans: We don't care. If you can rock with us: You are one of us. Kiwifarms may disable or restrict registration. We don't. We're here for you and always will be.

If you have a technical issue with Xenforo: Please post your request in the Town Square or the Talk to Staff (If you want more privacy) and one of us will check it out to address your concerns.Thank you for all your forum contributions (Owner - Onion Null).


Onionfarms.net(Onionfarms Social Media Channel-Powered By Humhub)
Open to members of the Onionfarms & Kiwifarms communities as well as the general public
Upload videos and audios up to 2GB (larger upload capacity than TikTok)
Create your own private spaces(discussion groups)
Forum registration isn't required if Onionfarms.com isn't your cup of tea. We understand and won't hold it against you.
Share your posts on X.com, Facebook, LinkedIn

Kiwifarms Speculation Lidl Drip

Parody Threads related to Kiwifarms Satire and speculation threads related to Null or Kiwifarms go here.
"You think I'm Josh larping as a woman? FUCK RIGHT OFF TO ONION FARMS THEN!!!"
31694 - SoyBooru.png
 
I actually agree with him. I too think 99,99% of porn nowadays is violent, degrading, dehumanizing and nothing a sane individual who values their sex life and that of their significant other should want to watch. What Didl conveniently forgets to mention is that most of these hyperviolent BDSM porn movies are still straight porn movies. It's a woman getting wrecked and ruined by a man. That's what straight people do to one another when they are being heterosexual exhibitionists on the internet. Yet Didl and Null still insist that hetero sex is somehow less destructive and dangerous than gay sex. Or they will blame straight people having acess to gay porn for "inspiring" straight people to have more degenerate sex, as if straight people can't be degenerate on their own and somehow feel the need to catch up with the gays' more advanced levels of degeneracy.

If you need to remind yourself what cuddly, loving, tender sex heterosexuals are having as opposed to those disgusting gay homosexuals wrecking their assholes, just go watch the next straight porn movie you're spammed with. It's amazing to me how trad-LARPers like Null and Didl will bigot-wax poetically about all the sick depraved asshole-ruining gay porn, when most violent porn online is straight porn. How willfully blind do you have to be not to see this?
 
I actually agree with him. I too think 99,99% of porn nowadays is violent, degrading, dehumanizing and nothing a sane individual who values their sex life and that of their significant other should want to watch. What Didl conveniently forgets to mention is that most of these hyperviolent BDSM porn movies are still straight porn movies. It's a woman getting wrecked and ruined by a man. That's what straight people do to one another when they are being heterosexual exhibitionists on the internet. Yet Didl and Null still insist that hetero sex is somehow less destructive and dangerous than gay sex. Or they will blame straight people having acess to gay porn for "inspiring" straight people to have more degenerate sex, as if straight people can't be degenerate on their own and somehow feel the need to catch up with the gays' more advanced levels of degeneracy.

If you need to remind yourself what cuddly, loving, tender sex heterosexuals are having as opposed to those disgusting gay homosexuals wrecking their assholes, just go watch the next straight porn movie you're spammed with. It's amazing to me how trad-LARPers like Null and Didl will bigot-wax poetically about all the sick depraved asshole-ruining gay porn, when most violent porn online is straight porn. How willfully blind do you have to be not to see this?

I guess you don't read up the threads on the womens sites where the girls detail their secret fantasies or fetishes.
 
I guess you don't read up the threads on the womens sites where the girls detail their secret fantasies or fetishes.

Fantasy is not reality my dude. Many people have fantasies that should stay in their heads. Many try to make real their fantasies, thinking it's going to be a hot adventure, only to discover that reality bares no relationship to fantasy whatsoever. There's a huge gap between fantasy and reality, and that's where desire goes to die.

Anyways, those women you are referring to, they aren't real women according to Null and Didl, they're just trannies LARP-ing as women to "poison the well" as it were. No true and honest woman has any secret fantasies or fetishes. Only the BPD hoes who were molested as children do, and those BPD hoes don't count as real women, at least according to KF. Just listen to Null and Didl, they know who the real women are and what they really want.
 
As soon as a woman posts something that reflects negatively on women, the first reaction is it must be a man attempting to make women look bad. Theres no such thing as bad women? Okay.
I didn't say anything was negative, I said lots of men pretend to be women. This is objectively true.
 
I guess you don't read up the threads on the womens sites where the girls detail their secret fantasies or fetishes.

Male kwiffar post constant sexual fantasies where they imagine themselves being raped by trannies, in explicit detail. They encourage each other to post these fantasies and to be as explicit as possible. Not only do men love rape porn, they also like to imagine themselves as participating in it as the victims. This isn't contained to just KF either; any platform with men on it now contains these pornographic fantasies. Men don't have any moral high ground to stand on when it comes to porn. (This is because of the innate homosexuality present in all men but that's another post. See: Fight Club.)
 
I'm not going to quantify it, but if you think it's not a phenomenon you are too naive for this world
Obviously he knows. He has a point though, it's silly to always handwave what has been said by women on the internet as written by a man. It should be something you consider, but unless there's evidence for it being true there's nothing wrong with assuming that a woman did indeed write it.
 
Back
Top