Does he consider communist and socialist authoritarian? What a sperg.
All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.
For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.that'd be accurate, copeView attachment 39009
Does he consider communist and socialist authoritarian? What a sperg.
You're really thickOh you understand the word? Why did you put it in quotes then? I was concerned for you so I gave you the definition.
Good job missing the point, man. Here I'm done dragging this out.
Wow. Really hard to understand that point. Incredibly complicated.
- I respond to "Josh isn't as principled as he wants you to believe"
- With: What makes you think that?
- I add examples of him, Josh, being unprincipled.
- I add the context that his beliefs change with the crowd that acts like they're saving the west by shitposting.
- "likely just a moral shift to avoid dealing with the moralfags he now surrounds himself daily with?"
Anyways have a great day.
Oh my
- I respond to "Josh isn't as principled as he wants you to believe"
- With: What makes you think that?
- I add examples of him, Josh, being unprincipled.
- I add the context that his beliefs change with the crowd that acts like they're saving the west by shitposting.
- "likely just a moral shift to avoid dealing with the moralfags he now surrounds himself daily with?"
Is every post of yours criticizing someone a moral judgement?You're really thick
I put it in quotes because I don't agree with its use, moron, like "personal army" and all the other r/4chan words you like to use as an imageboard-brained "oldfag"
Are you seriously so fucking dumb that you can't see how this is a moral judgement of Josh?
I'm not running, I'm trying to not derail the thread completely.Sure, run away.
Huh? Yes. Are you this fucking dumb?Is every post of yours criticizing someone a moral judgement?
Is your counter-point a moral judgement?
Now, that's fucking cringe.I'm not running, I'm trying to not derail the thread completely.
You can make a thread, or just DM me directly if you want to argue and we'll argue as long as you like.
I think he would be too afraid to be in the same room with that much steroid and beef testosterone fueled raw masculinity and joe would probably have a more interesting interview with a chimpanzee anyway. If joe pressed him on anything he would back down and would be too afraid to say anything if he did manage it. I doubt joe would want to touch the poop anyway though but he has done interviews with Alex Jones so it's not entirely out of the question either.WAIT WAIT, DOES JOSH REALLY THINK HE HAS ANY CHANCE TO GO INTO ROGAN?!
It would be an accurate observation of history and objectively correct conclusion to come to regardless of him being a sperg.View attachment 39009
Does he consider communist and socialist authoritarian? What a sperg.
Literal projection.Yes.
The main issue of course is that socialists aren't going to say: "Yeah, we're authoritarian."It would be an accurate observation of history and objectively correct conclusion to come to regardless of him being a sperg.
National socialism communism socialism and fascism are all left wing and authoritarian firstly. There can be right and left wing authoritarianism it isn't just limited to one side like monarchy being right wing but are still not much different than modern dictators besides their looks. Left and right is pretty much mostly economic collective or individualism and specific ideologies such as those fall into one or the other. Secondly you're reading too much into it and capitalist isn't on there either so immediately jumping to your interpretation is pretty funny and quite telling. Like a rorschach test almost. If you look at the pattern these are all more of a government focus political identity not economic and those are all economic focused as opposed to legal focused. Not to mention libertarian and anarchist are in there as well. Depending on the status quo these could all mean different things. A Chinese conservative isn't the same and an American conservative as they have different values but both are conservative and these terms are relative. I would go as far to say as people are not any of these labels, their views are and people could have one view that is progressive and another that is conservative so are we really adding up points like it is a political alignment test? That's why it is easier for people to just say they are the side they like best even if they don't fit in.You can't just list most major political ideologies but then list two of them under right wing terms/understandings. It's like Vaush making a poll and you can't choose conservative or right wing, only "Nazi" or "fascist". Or a conservative poll where you can't choose liberal or progressive, only "commie".
How's that projection? Critising someone or pointing out a quality or value is a moral judgement by defitnion.Literal projection.
"Nazism and fascism are left-wing"National socialism communism socialism and fascism are all left wing and authoritarian firstly. There can be right and left wing authoritarianism it isn't just limited to one side like monarchy being right wing but a
The one thing nazis fascists socialists and communists agree on is that they want to distance themselves from eachother. You couldn't even define what left and right is. Regardless of how you do it will be biased towards a side. You just outed yourself as one of them. Doesn't matter which one because they're all retarded and they are all different flavors of shit.How's that projection? Critising someone or pointing out a quality or value is a moral judgement by defitnion.
"Nazism and fascism are left-wing"
Now, this thread is such a festival of retards
Mr. Englehardt is a gentleman and a professional and would never reply in such a childish and vitriolic manner, thereby giving ammo to his enemies in exchange for asspats from his users.
I would have photoshopped dicks on one of her pictures and sent it in response as a tried and true classic.Mr. Englehardt is a professional and would never reply in such a childish and vitriolic manner.
To be fair, they drew first blood. The fact that vito's managed to get all of Josh's former associates to rally for him probably drives him up the wall. Turns out people love child molesters' personality over a sperg. Which should make sense, how else can they get away with being pedos without having a high charisma rating.I think Vito is a thoroughly disgusting piece of shit but he must have really gotten under Null's skin this time because he is personally directing farmers to do a Vito thread in the Dick Masterson thread.
View attachment 39023
The broom isn't that reliable a narrator, he's told some bold faced lies to Kwiffar. Imagine you are a bank manager, Diddler, Gunt, Dead Man Jim, and the broom walk in. You're hitting the button for security before they sit down.Seriously, Josh said that the only reason NP2 didn't work is that Josh's trolls forced it offline
Its extremely fucking obvious dick and nick have declared war on the farms
Maybe it's not that I'm trying to complain about his ethics but the history of him constantly shifting his beliefs to imply that he doesn't really believe anything.