ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
Updates to Website
All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.
For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.There are issues with missing attachments. I am looking into this.
Topics of Interest
Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread
- Thread starter Randy Know
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 1776hosting 1776hosting.com 2tsuki bear chemical cringe deceptive deviant dick fancy fancy bear farms fat flow flow chemical fraud huckster josh joshua conner moon joshua connor moon joshua moon kengle kenneth erwin engelhardt kiwi kiwifarms mental illness moon null onionfarms picture pizza stocking vincent vincent zhen warwick ri zhen
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
Nektar Geist
An Onion Among Onions
It'll be his own hubris/coding skillz. tbh.
Last edited:
Nektar Geist
An Onion Among Onions
It seems the broom is aware of a credible threat to Elaine's life.
The Royal We doesn't include the Kwiffar who are in those Discord groups. It always comes back to the Farms.
The Royal We doesn't include the Kwiffar who are in those Discord groups. It always comes back to the Farms.
Josh thinks trannies want to molest all the children and that pedophiles run the country and want you dead, and he'll do nothing about it but twiddle his thumbs.
Thank God he's not thinking of actually doing anything.
ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
Josh has always openly hated offsites because they blur lines and generate drama which then gets blamed on KF. It's a position I understand but chat is just as bad and encourages the same kind of cliques.
Nektar Geist
An Onion Among Onions
There's no difference. It's a human centipede of Autism. The idea that there are these different camps, like the Discord gang, The Kwiffar Gang etc. It's Double Turbo Autists creating shit to post to get dopamine via ass pat stickers. joshy is has this problem... he needs "milk" to grift off of. He clearly has no problem with any ILJ shit happening. But he doesn't want to hand over any loose thread of DMs to the feds (and he knows if you are gay oppin', he reads your DMs) and for the jumper to start to unravel. If it was a purely about "watching"... joshy would stream 2hrs every couple of months. Look at the Kwiffars twitter, how many have a link to some shitty clip channel?
joshy has become dependent on the grift. And you've seen the results.
Take Plodwinson (forgive me, but I am literally his only truw n 'onest Alawg), for months certain socks have been oppin to grift off of (and most likely with) Plodz. I pointed it out. I was Free Speech Absolutist'd. Ironically it was Fibwinson who (a few years now) who said that a certain vintage of account was ruining the site. That could be just the "ew newfags stealing my ass pats", but the year was... well. Later for that.
tl/dr: It's not the platforms. It's the people. And they are all Kwiffar at the end of the day.
I'm not aware of what's going on with ILJ, but will go and check it out. As the board has grown I've found myself consuming ever smaller parts of it.
I agree that Josh is "dependent on the grift". While some moves to grow the site have been successful in that they've attracted new members, I don't know they've ultimately been beneficial to the site.
The "illustrious" and "prestigious" far-right libertarian financial blog and news aggregator Zero Hedge added this disclaimer to Josh's article more than a year after it was posted.
"Contributor posts published on Zero Hedge do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Zero Hedge, and are not selected, edited or screened by Zero Hedge editors."
Josh's article had no disclaimer into at least September 2022. The removal could possibly sync up with the time Keffals waged war against Kiwifarms.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgyagd/keffals-kiwi-farms (September 7, 2022)
"Contributor posts published on Zero Hedge do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Zero Hedge, and are not selected, edited or screened by Zero Hedge editors."
Josh's article had no disclaimer into at least September 2022. The removal could possibly sync up with the time Keffals waged war against Kiwifarms.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgyagd/keffals-kiwi-farms (September 7, 2022)
Last edited:
ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
Boobie Bomb
Hellovan Onion
Get fucked Josh
ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
Null has become frustrated at people reporting secret watcher and made a thread about it.
Attachments
Boobie Bomb
Hellovan Onion
Null is a dumbass loser. lol
So apparently a couple of British academics have been scraping KF since 2013 and have written a study about #DropKiwiFarms:
This is the study, which you can download as a free .pdf but AFAICT it has not yet been published in an actual academic journal of name, so either their research methods are plainly unethical/dodgy that no self-respecting journal wanted to touch it, or they are still shopping it around:
KF has a thread about this study but I can't archive it, I'm getting a 403 error (The 403 Forbidden Error happens when the web page (or another resource) that you’re trying to open in your web browser is a resource that you’re not allowed to access.):
Deplatforming hate forums doesn't work, British boffins warn
Industry intervention alone can't deal with harassment
Thomas Claburn
Tue 18 Apr 2023 // 08:33 UTC
Depriving online hate groups of network services - otherwise known as deplatforming - doesn't work very well, according to boffins based in the United Kingdom.
In a recently released preprint paper, Anh Vu, Alice Hutchings, and Ross Anderson, from the University of Cambridge and the University of Edinburgh, examine efforts to disrupt harassment forum Kiwi Farms and find that community and industry interventions have been largely ineffective.
Their study, undertaken as lawmakers around the world are considering policies that aspire to moderate unlawful or undesirable online behavior, reveals that deplatforming has only a modest impact and those running harmful sites remain free to carry on harassing people through other services.
"Deplatforming users may reduce activity and toxicity levels of relevant actors on Twitter and Reddit, limit the spread of conspiratorial disinformation on Facebook, and minimize disinformation and extreme speech on YouTube," they write in their paper. "But deplatforming has often made hate groups and individuals even more extreme, toxic and radicalized."
As examples, they cite how Reddit's ban of r/incels in November 2017 led to the creation of two incel domains, which then grew rapidly. They also point to how users banned from Twitter and Reddit "exhibit higher levels of toxicity when migrating to Gab," among other similar situations.
Deplatforming hate forums doesn't work, British boffins warn
Industry intervention alone can't deal with harassmentwww.theregister.com
This is the study, which you can download as a free .pdf but AFAICT it has not yet been published in an actual academic journal of name, so either their research methods are plainly unethical/dodgy that no self-respecting journal wanted to touch it, or they are still shopping it around:
KF has a thread about this study but I can't archive it, I'm getting a 403 error (The 403 Forbidden Error happens when the web page (or another resource) that you’re trying to open in your web browser is a resource that you’re not allowed to access.):
Kramer is A Man Da
Remarkable Onion
first time not being a user? all A&H is restricted to users only, same with nudes.
ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
The majority of that thread is people trying to farm positive stickers by praising secret watcher.
ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
"Parasocial obsession" = trying to figure out why there are so many weird rumours going around about Null, and trying to figure out if any of them are based in reality.
It's cool that Lidl personally doesn't give a shit about whose forum he's on and what that forum is used for, but others are more curious/concerned about it.
I am just gonna point to Marilyn Manson again and warn that the reason Manson has such a hard time defending himself right now against all these criminal accusations levelled against him, is partially his own damn fault: it's because Manson allowed the wild rumour-mongering about him to spread online and off-line for years and actively encouraged it in some cases. For example, Manson could have told the truth about the notorious Groupie tape - for decades the subject of wild speculation - and just released it online for anyone to see for themselves. He could have done this years ago, but he thought it was better to allow wild rumours to spread to make himself seem more extreme than he really is (or so he now claims). The rumour mongering effectively provides Manson with probable deniability ("oh, it's just crazy people saying crazy things, lol, they've always done that!") until there's an actual lawsuit or criminal prosecution, and all of a sudden people's inability to distinguish fact from fiction comes back to bite you hard.
Rumours are funny and lulz (and a source of personal notoriety and income) as long as you're not actually made to answer for them. That's what I have to say to both Manson and Null.
It's cool that Lidl personally doesn't give a shit about whose forum he's on and what that forum is used for, but others are more curious/concerned about it.
I am just gonna point to Marilyn Manson again and warn that the reason Manson has such a hard time defending himself right now against all these criminal accusations levelled against him, is partially his own damn fault: it's because Manson allowed the wild rumour-mongering about him to spread online and off-line for years and actively encouraged it in some cases. For example, Manson could have told the truth about the notorious Groupie tape - for decades the subject of wild speculation - and just released it online for anyone to see for themselves. He could have done this years ago, but he thought it was better to allow wild rumours to spread to make himself seem more extreme than he really is (or so he now claims). The rumour mongering effectively provides Manson with probable deniability ("oh, it's just crazy people saying crazy things, lol, they've always done that!") until there's an actual lawsuit or criminal prosecution, and all of a sudden people's inability to distinguish fact from fiction comes back to bite you hard.
Rumours are funny and lulz (and a source of personal notoriety and income) as long as you're not actually made to answer for them. That's what I have to say to both Manson and Null.
ipreferpickles
An Onion Among Onions
