• I am cleaning up the Cowsphere forum. If you are looking for something in the Cowsphere and can't find it please check in the celebritysphere.

Kiwifarms Associate Flamesoul / "Redd" / ReddZArtz / Artzredd / reddzdeddz / xReddifx / Skypaw298 / like-a-redwhisker

People who are a part of the kiwifarms forum or closely connected with it.
His square head and her round ass head remind me of UP.
,o7i46hwfwa.jpg
 
Special thanks to @OneRootinTootinMotherFucker for his great work from back in the day that allowed this thread to be possible.
Special shoutout to the retards on kiwifarms who decided not to make a thread on this freak predator and as a result made it far easier for them to prey upon people and animals. Great job on defending a pedophile dogfucker because they were raped as a kid which somehow excuses being attracted to animals and children
Not your personal army
 
I hope @Flamesoul and @null do date and get married then our 2 divided houses will be broght together and a new golden era will begin. Oh and the childs name? Who better than the one who started it all: Chris conner moon
  • @SIGSEGV opened up a computer store in japan. he married a body pillow 8 years later
  • @Cjoker developed lung cancer and died. he is succeed by his 2 kids
  • @Gangweedfan died in a car crash in the mountains. the body was never found
  • @zedkissed91 became the head of the NSA for his exceptional doxing skills
  • @FuckedUp married the ikea couch and had several kids
  • Oh and kengle? well he quit the internet business and opened up an onion stand
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Leg Pit Cream: You have accused this person of being a pedophile. Has this person been listed on a sex offender registry?
She talked about fantasies of teenagers having sex, which is creepy to say the least. She also visited the home of a 16 year old when she was 22 and forced him to spoon her and slept in his bed. The accusations that he molested her don't even matter at that point, what she did was predatory and exploitative of a child.

Perhaps there is an explanation, but @Flamesoul has chosen to respond in this thread to every point against her *except* that a minor claims she groomed him and then tried to metoo him to hide it.

I don't know, personally I wouldn't give a shit about defending my fury art and focus on dispelling the notion that I am a pedophile, unless I had not grounds to do that.

I think if @Flamesoul is innocent, she should do something to refute the claims.

edit, some more screenshots from the blog accusing her of being a pedo for extra context:
1613711870079.png
1613711833211.png
1613711942866.png
1613711968867.png
 
Favourite Jimmy Saville story is how he was fired off the British Rail adverts because the higher ups thought he was a necrophiliac.

Funny how the one public institution to get shot of him was the one that got mothballed.
He allegedly was a necrophiliac though, he even made rings out of fake eyes that he looted from the corpses he raped at the morgues.
 
Because he is not a public figure.
It's a good thread and deserves to be in the individuals section on the grounds that it exposes @Flamesoul's disgusting behavior. The thread is a public service.
The "pedophile" label is only for people who have been convicted of sex crimes against children in a court of law and have been placed on a public sex offender registry.
So if I go out and fuck several children over the course of multiple months, I'm not a pedophile unless I get caught?
This is for our protection against possible defamation lawsuits.
She has better things to do than sue a small forum. Drawing furry art, for instance.
 
Because he is not a public figure. The "pedophile" label is only for people who have been convicted of sex crimes against children in a court of law and have been placed on a public sex offender registry. This is for our protection against possible defamation lawsuits.
You uh, do know that OF (and KF for that matter) is immune from defamation suits due to section 230, right? This law basically says that you aren't responsible for what your users post

Now if you go back and edit the OP, legally you're the owner of that and *can* be sued though. So don't do that.
 
You uh, do know that OF (and KF for that matter) is immune from defamation suits due to section 230, right? This law basically says that you aren't responsible for what your users post

Now if you go back and edit the OP, legally you're the owner of that and *can* be sued though. So don't do that.
I took out the pedophile tag and had changed the pedophile subtitle. I don't want to do shit that will get Onionfarms banned in the same way KF has been banned.
 
Back
Top