Non-Country Debate user SSj_Ness about rape..

Thread that is not connected to a particular country or miscellaneous posts
SSj_Nonce post: 105735 said:
So to be clear for anyone reading, @polonium refuses to condemn a madlad who posted bantz, but correctly points out users who refuse to condemn pedophilia.
 
Ok groomer.
Still won't condemn him, you're caught in 4k pedophile

I said I posted a tranny fucking a severed skinned horse head. No children involved except you looking at it. And the 16 year old girl you groom in dms. @Busty O'Queef
I'm talking about the pedo cannibal recipe you posted, not the porn...nor the murdered baby imagery.

You're a sick fuck and your fellow pedos won't condemn you.
 
Or our Founding Fathers.
Ok, Davey Crockett. Just say you can't think critically.
I still don't know why that's an issue.
And this is the problem. You don't really want to acknowledge anything. You're now trying to spin it. "Oh well, ok so maybe he lied... but why is it a problem?" The point was: Is joshy a person of honest character? NO CLEARLY NOT. You still claim to not see this.

Let's follow this through, because everything else you posted after this is pointless, Do you accept that the statement "joshy had no connection to russia" to be a disprovable lie?

If so, you have to accept that he thinks the kwiffar are stupid. TBF you can be used as evidence here. It's an easy to prove lie. Do you accept that it is a lie. Can you actually do this? Verify a fact for yourself. That DA was his pp at the time. Do you accept that lie is not going to help him when it comes to dealing with Service Providers. You are grown up enough, right? You have worked jobs, and understand that you can't tell lies like that?

You understand the kind of shit you get (rightly so) telling fucking stupid lies like that? Saying "No, I don't have a connect to a country that USA is having a proxy war with" is a dumb thing to say, if you want people to trust you.

You understand that when a tard tells lies like that, you don't have to believe "I'm not a nonce, it's free speech, what... you disagree with me BANNNED!" Y'know, when that tard has a history of whacking off to "Intergenerational Cat boi porn".

You'd understand, these are not concepts you'd have to be Kant to get your bonce around? Rhetorical. Question.
 
Back
Top