Celebrities, public figures, current events, internet drama

Who can be a part of our community? All races, ethnicities, religions, gay or straight, cis or trans: We don't care. If you can rock with us: You are one of us. Kiwifarms may disable or restrict registration. We don't. We're here for you and always will be.

If you have a technical issue with Xenforo: Please post your request in the Town Square or the Talk to Staff (If you want more privacy) and one of us will check it out to address your concerns.Thank you for all your forum contributions (Owner - Onion Null).


Community Featured Submissions:

Announcements

What would you like to see done with the political content and countries subforum?

  • Keep the political material & country subforums the way they are

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    15
Subtitle
Ken's announcements can be found here concerning the onionverse
It's shockingly easy to lie on the internet and shift the narrative isn't it?

What happened to your original interview with Thurlow when you said that wasn't him and he was a good guy?
Fine, I'll make myself a liar on not responding to address that, because I'd like to anyway, and I know Kiwis are reading. I never said it wasn't him, I made a pretty carefully worded statement that it wasn't proven to be him, and it wasn't, largely because of some fucking gayops muddying the waters with people pretending to be him on Discord, things like that, and the fact that the dox was total dogshit composed by actual retards (look to see if that little squad has doxed anyone since, they haven't) ... even if it wound up being accurate enough as it was. One of those morons (the monkey guy I think) even made some kind of statement to the effect of "oh well, even if it's not Angry Canadian this Thurlow guy is a Nazi so fuck him." Doesn't inspire confidence. I did my job as a moderator to shut down what was at that point a fail and unsanctioned halal. But I certainly never said he was a good guy. Good for a laugh, maybe, as a pet tard and that he did come out with a few bits of content. I didn't see actual danger. I've got to own that but so do a lot of people. Your site, on the other hand, was actively employing him during the revenge porn arc. That's quite a different matter.
 
Fine, I'll make myself a liar on not responding to address that, because I'd like to anyway, and I know Kiwis are reading. I never said it wasn't him, I made a pretty carefully worded statement that it wasn't proven to be him, and it wasn't, largely because of some fucking gayops muddying the waters with people pretending to be him on Discord, things like that, and the fact that the dox was total dogshit composed by actual retards (look to see if that little squad has doxed anyone since, they haven't) ... even if it wound up being accurate enough as it was. One of those morons (the monkey guy I think) even made some kind of statement to the effect of "oh well, even if it's not Angry Canadian this Thurlow guy is a Nazi so fuck him." Doesn't inspire confidence. I did my job as a moderator to shut down what was at that point a fail and unsanctioned halal. But I certainly never said he was a good guy. Good for a laugh, maybe, as a pet tard and that he did come out with a few bits of content. I didn't see actual danger. I've got to own that but so do a lot of people. Your site, on the other hand, was actively employing him during the revenge porn arc. That's quite a different matter.
lol calm down.
 
Moralfag didn't dox him.
Not Walker Burgess, he just looks like a monkey, I mean the RadioactiveMonkeyMan poster, who's some tard that alogs tooter. And he didn't do the "dox" either, apparently, just posted it. It just kind of hanging there with nobody clear on who actually was making the claim and what their evidence was. That alone should make it clear why it wasn't given the go-ahead in August, and almost makes you see why Discord ineviably leading to gayops and drama is a meme, what with the main evidence of the "dox" being shared names on Discord when someone was admittedly pretending to be him on that very platform to troll.
 
I don't want to bother socking on KF to make a statement of some kind about Spooky Bones-related drama.
oh.PNG
 
A metric I'd use for if someone has wiki potential would be how much content they produce, more important if they have any art or literary pieces to speak of.
I'm not certain if video content would suffice.
She produces a lot of content on her social media. I am reluctant with art cows because they may view their work as intellectual property. There was a cwcville historian that archived all the videos and I think there are external hard drives up to 3 or 4 TB so it is possible. However, with an art cow we may have to do this very carefully.
 
Last edited:
I told you this guy was bad news in January. He was actively posting revenge porn not long after, on dotorg in full view of everyone. I know you browse that site. It looks like they finally woke up to the fact that posting and hosting that is very fucking illegal so they attempted to memory-hole it. Anyway, the fact that neither they nor evidently you nor in turn Kengle himself, because I know he skulks around all these sites like the absolute goblin that he is, saw this is a problem only tells on you. If you're surprised I'm a little miffed you ignored me all this time, then I can only chalk that up to good old autism.

Now the whole thing is spilling out and you were empowering and enabling this guy because you thought he was funny. I won't lie, at one point I did too, but that stopped even before the felonies and over-the-top harassment of his "doxing" (phonebooking and blackmailing) victims began. You were in a position to do something to curb this psychopath even just a little bit. Even dotorg was at least calling him a faggot but in your and Kengle's demented quest for content you decided he was still alright and mde him a fucking moderator.

Kengle should just give it up and go on IP2 or something and you should give into your nature and stream snipe vtubers or whatever it is that lolicons with a thirst for attention are doing. Don't act for a second like there isn't egg on your face. This is, as DCS Foyle would put it, a resignation issue.

You too, you fat, pedo-adjacent burger-bungler. I was joking last night but if you unironically think Josh sperging out on you while having one of his Really Bad Days That Day and then (I assume) realizing calling the cops was a dumb idea is in any way equivalent to the fact that this is a guy who has committed several felonies in front of this entire sector of the Internet. Onion Farms has always been an oddly endearing backwater, but you've taken on staff that make it a cesspit. You're out of your league here and, beautiful Icarus, with Michael Robert Thurlow you flew well and truly too close to the sun.

Bruh you need a 100% do-over.


Current colors clash and don't particularly make you think of onions. Neon and weird combination of serif sans-serif text suggests a bad acid trip in 1997 rather than anything organic. Think more inside the box a this point.

OK coomer.
Jesus, you've had grievances with me this entire time.
I've been banned from discord 4 times since wee started dming there, how was I avoiding you?
Also, i love how you call me an Elaine orbiters when you and I met in an Elaine server.
Fine, I'll make myself a liar on not responding to address that, because I'd like to anyway, and I know Kiwis are reading. I never said it wasn't him, I made a pretty carefully worded statement that it wasn't proven to be him, and it wasn't, largely because of some fucking gayops muddying the waters with people pretending to be him on Discord, things like that, and the fact that the dox was total dogshit composed by actual retards (look to see if that little squad has doxed anyone since, they haven't) ... even if it wound up being accurate enough as it was. One of those morons (the monkey guy I think) even made some kind of statement to the effect of "oh well, even if it's not Angry Canadian this Thurlow guy is a Nazi so fuck him." Doesn't inspire confidence. I did my job as a moderator to shut down what was at that point a fail and unsanctioned halal. But I certainly never said he was a good guy. Good for a laugh, maybe, as a pet tard and that he did come out with a few bits of content. I didn't see actual danger. I've got to own that but so do a lot of people. Your site, on the other hand, was actively employing him during the revenge porn arc. That's quite a different matter.
WTF, do you not remember I want involved with burnbook or any of the ILJ shit, i posted in the original thread that's it.
 
She produces a lot of content on her social media. I am reluctant with art cows because they may view their work as intellectual property. There was a cwcville historian that archived all the videos and I think there are external hard drives up to 3 or 4 TB so it is possible. However, with an art cow we may have to do this very carefully.
Arjen the tranny pvcc librarian?
Also, it's fair use it's not like you'd be selling mugs with their art.
 
What makes a good wiki subject?

Essential: The person is active on social media accounts that can be embedded on a WordPress site (CommonNinja app). In general, the more content the better.
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Pinterest
Vimeo
Tumblr
Blogs
WordPress blog
Blogger

Instagram can be partially embedded
TikTok has not been tested yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essential: The person must be highly followed
Someone in the Celebritysphere with strong lolcow secondary characteristics or
Someone in the Cowsphere with a strong celebrity-like following

There are two reasons behind this:
The more highly followed a person is on social media, the more accustomed they are to being in the public eye. They are less likely to clam up and shut down. If we scare the cow off the internet then we are doing it wrong. We are looking for quality content from a long and productive relationship.

A wiki on a highly followed person is more likely to drive traffic to Onionfarms than a wiki on someone who is a nobody

Essential: Psychology
The person has to be what you would call an “attention whore”, someone who can be “buttered up”

Essential: The person has unique content
The person has unique content: Avoid “A-List celebrities” such as Justin Timberlake otherwise you will simply be regurgitating what has already been printed by media sites such as Hollywood radar, Entertainment Tonight and so forth

Highly Desirable: The person has artwork, literary material that is readily available for fair use.

How many cows should we document? Depending on what kind of material you want it may be one or a small group of cows.
 
What makes a good wiki subject?

Essential: The person is active on social media accounts that can be embedded on a WordPress site (CommonNinja app). In general, the more content the better.
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Pinterest
Vimeo
Tumblr
Blogs
WordPress blog
Blogger

Instagram can be partially embedded
TikTok has not been tested yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essential: The person must be highly followed
Someone in the Celebritysphere with strong lolcow secondary characteristics or
Someone in the Cowsphere with a strong celebrity-like following

There are two reasons behind this:
The more highly followed a person is on social media, the more accustomed they are to being in the public eye. They are less likely to clam up and shut down. If we scare the cow off the internet then we are doing it wrong. We are looking for quality content from a long and productive relationship.

A wiki on a highly followed person is more likely to drive traffic to Onionfarms than a wiki on someone who is a nobody

Essential: Psychology
The person has to be what you would call an “attention whore”, someone who can be “buttered up”

Essential: The person has unique content
The person has unique content: Avoid “A-List celebrities” such as Justin Timberlake otherwise you will simply be regurgitating what has already been printed by media sites such as Hollywood radar, Entertainment Tonight and so forth

Highly Desirable: The person has artwork, literary material that is readily available for fair use.

How many cows should we document? Depending on what kind of material you want it may be one or a small group of cows.
coupypastea
 
What makes a good wiki subject?

Essential: The person is active on social media accounts that can be embedded on a WordPress site (CommonNinja app). In general, the more content the better.
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Pinterest
Vimeo
Tumblr
Blogs
WordPress blog
Blogger

Instagram can be partially embedded
TikTok has not been tested yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essential: The person must be highly followed
Someone in the Celebritysphere with strong lolcow secondary characteristics or
Someone in the Cowsphere with a strong celebrity-like following

There are two reasons behind this:
The more highly followed a person is on social media, the more accustomed they are to being in the public eye. They are less likely to clam up and shut down. If we scare the cow off the internet then we are doing it wrong. We are looking for quality content from a long and productive relationship.

A wiki on a highly followed person is more likely to drive traffic to Onionfarms than a wiki on someone who is a nobody

Essential: Psychology
The person has to be what you would call an “attention whore”, someone who can be “buttered up”

Essential: The person has unique content
The person has unique content: Avoid “A-List celebrities” such as Justin Timberlake otherwise you will simply be regurgitating what has already been printed by media sites such as Hollywood radar, Entertainment Tonight and so forth

Highly Desirable: The person has artwork, literary material that is readily available for fair use.

How many cows should we document? Depending on what kind of material you want it may be one or a small group of cows.
coupypastea
 
What makes a good wiki subject?

Essential: The person is active on social media accounts that can be embedded on a WordPress site (CommonNinja app). In general, the more content the better.
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Pinterest
Vimeo
Tumblr
Blogs
WordPress blog
Blogger

Instagram can be partially embedded
TikTok has not been tested yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essential: The person must be highly followed
Someone in the Celebritysphere with strong lolcow secondary characteristics or
Someone in the Cowsphere with a strong celebrity-like following

There are two reasons behind this:
The more highly followed a person is on social media, the more accustomed they are to being in the public eye. They are less likely to clam up and shut down. If we scare the cow off the internet then we are doing it wrong. We are looking for quality content from a long and productive relationship.

A wiki on a highly followed person is more likely to drive traffic to Onionfarms than a wiki on someone who is a nobody

Essential: Psychology
The person has to be what you would call an “attention whore”, someone who can be “buttered up”

Essential: The person has unique content
The person has unique content: Avoid “A-List celebrities” such as Justin Timberlake otherwise you will simply be regurgitating what has already been printed by media sites such as Hollywood radar, Entertainment Tonight and so forth

Highly Desirable: The person has artwork, literary material that is readily available for fair use.

How many cows should we document? Depending on what kind of material you want it may be one or a small group of cows.
coupypastea
 
What makes a good wiki subject?

Essential: The person is active on social media accounts that can be embedded on a WordPress site (CommonNinja app). In general, the more content the better.
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Pinterest
Vimeo
Tumblr
Blogs
WordPress blog
Blogger

Instagram can be partially embedded
TikTok has not been tested yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Essential: The person must be highly followed
Someone in the Celebritysphere with strong lolcow secondary characteristics or
Someone in the Cowsphere with a strong celebrity-like following

There are two reasons behind this:
The more highly followed a person is on social media, the more accustomed they are to being in the public eye. They are less likely to clam up and shut down. If we scare the cow off the internet then we are doing it wrong. We are looking for quality content from a long and productive relationship.

A wiki on a highly followed person is more likely to drive traffic to Onionfarms than a wiki on someone who is a nobody

Essential: Psychology
The person has to be what you would call an “attention whore”, someone who can be “buttered up”

Essential: The person has unique content
The person has unique content: Avoid “A-List celebrities” such as Justin Timberlake otherwise you will simply be regurgitating what has already been printed by media sites such as Hollywood radar, Entertainment Tonight and so forth

Highly Desirable: The person has artwork, literary material that is readily available for fair use.

How many cows should we document? Depending on what kind of material you want it may be one or a small group of cows.
coupypastea
 
Back
Top