Cowsphere - KF Orbiter Lounge 96

[mtil]

there is a hidden smurf porn subforum available only to gold star posters

 

[𒂶𒃑𒄀𒄖𒄦𒅑𒆑]

Let us not forget this is a paypig site. In other words, @kiwifails paid for this

People trust Ken with their bank details? The world has gone mad

 

[kiwifails]

Well, since it's always opposites day in Onionland, I'll tell you.

Now let me tell you

It's the same girl in the image you deleted, except the pose was significantly more suggestive and obviously designed to make her look as young as possible.

This can be said about almost every kind of pornography they do in fact try to make women look as young as possible.

How damning.
Not really

Not really it was saurces legal from a 3 party site search site
All images should have been filtered.

So, essentially no different than those v-tuber anime avatars that (are designed to) look child-aged, that @kiwifails has spent so many words trying to make an argument that all viewers of such v-tubers are pedophiles.

I think there's a difference between @TheWashingtonogre defending actual child porn versus posting a picture posting a picture of an 18 year old girl that you thought was a 14 year old because you're a homosexual who can't tell the difference between the two.

In other words, since @kiwifails keeps images of this girl (which are designed to make her look child-aged) that makes @kiwifails a pedophile by @kiwifails' own definition.

Wow that's a lot of projection

Oh right, almost forgot this bit. She might actually be under 18, and @kiwifails keeps images of her, which leads to the same conclusion - @kiwifails is a pedophile.

So looking at pictures of 18-year-old girls makes me a pedophile? Now you're starting to sound a little hysteric

I don't care about this.

You really do care about this

You're very welcome, pedofails.

And this is why gargamel should be banned from this website users here shouldn't have to be continuously punished for his obvious grudge against you Ken @Cat Administrator

Keeping a known pedophile around is a great look.

Yeah having pictures of 18-year-old girls makes me a pedophile okay gargamel is there anything else you'd like to make an ass of yourself about?

No, you are not excused. The image posted to Lounge 96 is significantly more damning (and is free of any and all teddybears) than the image posted here.

So let me get this straight without the teddy bear it's just a just a picture of a naked 18 year old? Oh absolutely obscene

I saw both images (you did not) and therefore I can make that statement.

You mean the picture you said wasn't the picture but now you're saying is the picture?
It's almost like you continuously keep on molding this narrative to fit your grudge and vendetta against people

I'm pretty sure that extremely sketchy site is a front for a pedophile ring anyway. You don't even have to have a lawyer when your siI

Well I hope no actresses were victims of human trafficking I like to source ethically I don't mind consenting adults creating adult content.

 

[kiwifails]

Let us not forget this is a paypig site. In other words, @kiwifails paid for this

Who said I paid for it this is probably the most ridiculous claim that you've made yet.
Perhaps you have forgotten the internet provides and this amounts of free distribution.
I never even said that I got the picture from that website I simply said it originated from there because of the watermark.

 

[kiwifails]

Incredibly. The fact Kiwifails thought he was remotely exonerated is shocking.

I am exonerated I don't think posting pictures of 18-year-olds nude makes me a pedophile nice try Daniel how's gargamel's dick taste?

This is the second website you've posted porn from that also peddles in CSAM

Citation needed what was the first one pornhub?

but it's fine because some autistic shit about ethics in record keeping or whatever.

So you're saying that it is compliant with US law

Sort of funny you and your friend Shadfan both jerk off to galleries that contain children

Citation needed

but you're only really looking at the goth/cat girls.

And?

I'm actually looking forward to Garga's OP, I expect it will be revealing

And I was waiting for this Daniel continuously starting fights with users and switching sides back and forth to create as much infighting as possible.

I agree with @Crimson Fucker

This why you should be banned

 

[kiwifails]

I second this. He's been very open about sharing porn here so it'd be hella sus for him to suddenly be bashful. Oh, on the note, did you see the pic he posted that came from a site that got busted for distributing CSAM?

https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/images-thread.4894/page-27#post-141848

And yet that picture was sourced from Google images not a now defunct website


Nice try though I understand you'll do anything to get attention even if it makes you look like an idiot.

 

[kiwifails]

I know the image that was posted because I was the one who deleted it. It came from a modeling website that does indeed have models under the age of 18 years of age. What @kiwifails posted (the seminude model with the teddy bear) was in all likelihood someone who was 18 or over even though the background may have given the appearance of a somewhat "childlike setting". I don't know what else may have been posted on Gargamel's forum and I don't want to know.

Modeling websites that depict sexually explicit content are regulated by 18 USC section2257 which mandates recordkeeping and labeling requirements on adult performers who engage in sexually explicit content. It is legal for a site to use underage models if the content produced is not considered sexually explicit content (either real or simulated) and is exempt from recordkeeping requirements.

View attachment 75296

View attachment 75297

I didn't even source the image from the original website I got it from a third party site that's considered to be legal in the United States and used by millions of other people.

If the image is legal why did you delete it?

Because obviously it's created quite a controversy because of your histrionic meltdowns

If the image is not legal then why did that site distribute it to @kiwifails?

They didn't distribute it I got it from a third party distribution.
That's a good question maybe take it up with them because I wouldn't want to accidentally download something that's illegal.

What a batshit assumption to make about a site that distributes jerk off material featuring children

Daniel it's a picture of an 18 year old woman nice try you faggot

Because our hosting provider in Panama frowns on underage modeling sites and I along with staff felt it was in the best interests of our community to delete it.

Yeah but I didn't know that I got it from a third party image site which again is used by millions of other people and should be in compliance with the US law. I could have been better at vetting it I suppose.

People trust Ken with their bank details? The world has gone mad

I didn't pay for it I think that's the most egregious thing that's been said about me so far.
Imagine paying for pornography when it's free.

 

[kiwifails]

there is a hidden smurf porn subforum available only to gold star posters

It's mostly full of fur porn

 

[kiwifails]

"lI'm being unfairly targeted and harassed by Gargamel, on Onion Farms. Despite my innocence, he's making baseless accusations against me, claiming I posted an image of a young-looking 18-year-old woman and comparing it to lolicon content from VTubers. Which I'd like to remind you is actual child porn.

He's also falsely accusing me of distributing child pornography, despite being told that the content was not explicit.

Manipulative Behavior

Gargamel's behavior is not only harassing, but also manipulative. He's creating a false narrative to justify his actions, making it seem like I'm the one who's in the wrong. He's using this false narrative to continue fighting and harassing me, despite the fact that his accusations have been proven baseless. This kind of behavior is unacceptable and creates a toxic environment for other users.

Clarification on Lolicon and 18-year-old Images

Manipulative Behavior

Gargamel's behavior is not only harassing, but also manipulative. He's creating a false narrative to justify his actions, making it seem like I'm the one who's in the wrong. He's using this false narrative to continue fighting and harassing me, despite the fact that his accusations have been proven baseless. This kind of behavior is unacceptable and creates a toxic environment for other users.

Clarification on Lolicon and 18-year-old Images

It's essential to clarify that pictures of 18-year-old women are not the same as lolicon content. Lolicon refers to a specific genre of Japanese media that depicts young girls in a sexualized manner, often in a way that's considered exploitative and harmful. In contrast, images of 18-year-old women are simply depictions of adults and are not inherently problematic. Gargamel's attempt to conflate the two is a clear example of his manipulative behavior, and I'm concerned that his accusations are not only false but also damaging to my reputation.


Manipulation of Screenshots

Furthermore, Gargamel has been caught manipulating screenshots to support his false narrative. He's been selectively editing and cropping images to make it seem like I've posted or said something that I haven't. This is a clear attempt to deceive and mislead others, and it's unacceptable behavior. By manipulating screenshots, Gargamel is trying to create a false reality that supports his accusations, rather than relying on actual evidence. This kind of behavior undermines trust and credibility, and it's essential that the administration takes action to address this issue.

 

[Time 4 Guillotines]

Wow, that's a lot of words

 

[Gargamel]

Because our hosting provider in Panama frowns on underage modeling sites and I along with staff felt it was in the best interests of our community to delete it.

Funny how I came to the exact same conclusion.

there is a hidden smurf porn subforum available only to gold star posters

Smurfette ain't much of a looker.

Wow, that's a lot of words

Yeah I'm not reading any of that shit.

Yiff in hell @pedofails.

 

[Time 4 Guillotines]

And I was waiting for this Daniel continuously starting fights with users and switching sides back and forth to create as much infighting as possible.

You misjudge my motivations. I was being genuine with my intent to honor the cease-fire but you immediately proved yourself a bigger faggot than our local gay shekelfur. Also you're a pedophile, so I'm glad the cease-fire fell through.

 

[Crimson Fucker]

Yeah, remember that for when my nudes drop lol

You'll never catch me, I'm the foosy chad man

I just made a new one, that'll narrow it down.

 

[Crimson Fucker]

Ashley is better than you. That must sting.

Also, you're not going to do shit Trashley

 

[Crimson Fucker]

Been working my current job for a while now, pedofur.

He got a job as a pedofur? Well at least it's something he's good at.

 

[Crimson Fucker]

Yeah Ken, dropping encyclopedic knowledge about CSAM laws is a great look. About as normal as knowing the age of consent laws by state.

We get it, you don't consider age of consent and want to fuck kids.

 

[Crimson Fucker]

He did it with Naught and Zrcarlo. Onion Farms is sex pest positive as long as you bitch about Josh and KF loudly enough

If that were true you and Isaac would be welcome here and naught would still be active. Zcarlo never used the site.

 

[Crimson Fucker]

And I was waiting for this Daniel continuously starting fights with users and switching sides back and forth to create as much infighting as possible.

I agree with @Crimson Fucker

This why you should be banned

He is the biggest snake on this forum.

 

[Time 4 Guillotines]

If that were true you and Isaac would be welcome here and naught would still be active. Zcarlo never used the site.

Ok, pooner

 

[Crimson Fucker]

I love fucking kids