Updates to Website

All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.

For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.

There are issues with missing attachments. I am looking into this.

Topics of Interest

Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread

Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
KampungBoy said:
At this point even as cucked as the Kiwis are some of them must be wondering why zero headway is being made or updates given. This is just nuts MLM schemes are more transparent than this.
Click to expand...
>hey goy! Jewsh here! We gonna sue the internet company Epik! Just gimme your money and ill uh protect your civil rights and freedumbs cuz like I love it 😉

<OOPS! Sorry there stupid goyim-er I mean, fellow kiwifarmer! Gotta sit down with the US gubment to change those internet laws so that alogs stop bothering meh er I mean, protect your internet silly kiwifarmer user! Stop asking questions and donate to MATI

Joshua Connor Moon circa 2024
IMG_1709.png
 
Galactic Innerways said:
Is Zero headway some sort of project, wonder if it'll make KF go for for good
Click to expand...
Lol Null just announced it under his shell company Total Disaster Enterprises
Battle of Brainiac said:
Josh is live now admitting that yes if he gets what be wants then his work will be cited in “hundreds of court cases and will fuck you over.” He openly is laughing now and saying “Fuck you Hate me idc”

rumble.com

Mad at the Internet (March 1st, 2024)

https://mati.live https://t.me/mationair
rumble.com rumble.com
Click to expand...
Were at the "fuck you I'm taking my toys and going home" phase."
 
Battle of Brainiac said:
His intention is too stop people from abusing the court systems by repeatedly filing civil suits against him when they are dismissed. Greer for the past few years has filed about a dozen copywrite and emotional damage claims against josh and kiwifarms. Specifically about his music and his book he published. Greer does this for literally free as he files for himself 99% of the time. Josh however has been having to pay out to represent himself in court everytime. At one point he claimed in a pissed off rant on MATI that Greer and Melinda Scott’s court alogging had cost him thousands and it extremely was pissing him off. He is so mad at this that he has attempted to invoke District Attorneys and varies groups such as the EFF to represent his case of being civilly sued for hosting Greers Book without consent or paying royalties to do so.

Hes targeted copyright and fair use itself by basically trying to get the actual US government itself to change the laws and more importantly how copyright and fair use is enforced so that Greer cannot keep repeatedly suing him til he dies and must go through the actual federal government itself to sue josh for publishing his work without consent or fair use.

This in extension changes or nullifies Section 230 and Fair Use as it exists today and would immediately need a huge revisiting by SC to ratify what Josh is asking for. This would lead to extremely old and important precedents set in court such as Napster’s ruling to also be revisited and changed. Myspace, Facebook, Twitter etc would also need to adjust everything permanently to basically be in charge of anything you post being criminal in nature itself.


TLDR: Josh never gave a fuck about freedom of speech or Section 230 and just was Virtue Signaling. He only cares about himself and his business.
Click to expand...
If Josh was so concerned about repeated lawsuits by Russel Greer why didn't he try to have the court declare Russel Greer a vexatious litigant?
 
Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt said:
If Josh was so concerned about repeated lawsuits by Russel Greer why didn't he try to have the court declare Russel Greer a vexatious litigant?
Click to expand...
Realistically speaking if years ago Josh just removed the guys book or music and suggested to users to post it somewhere else like youtube and just link to it, instead of having his website essentially host it. He probably would have avoided all these legal troubles with Greer. Greer is a creepy stalker weirdo but Josh once again, made a decision to shit down the throat of someone who originally just wanted his work removed off the site due to financial concerns. Now Greer wants revenge and will never stop suing josh in civil court for being a faggot.

Many such cases for Josh.
 
Battle of Brainiac said:
Realistically speaking if years ago Josh just removed the guys book or music and suggested to users to post it somewhere else like youtube and just link to it, instead of having his website essentially host it. He probably would have avoided all these legal troubles with Greer. Greer is a creepy stalker weirdo but Josh once again, made a decision to shit down the throat of someone who originally just wanted his work removed off the site due to financial concerns. Now Greer wants revenge and will never stop suing josh in civil court for being a faggot.

Many such cases for Josh. ...Josh.
Click to expand...
All Greer wanted was for Josh to take down his stuff...Greer should've been aware of the fact that Josh wasn't willing to take it don despite him probably asking him, multiple fucking times to do so
 
Battle of Brainiac said:
Copywrite
Click to expand...

Battle of Brainiac said:
copywrite
Click to expand...

Is there a reason you're spelling this consistently as copywrite instead of "copyright"? Not trolling, sincere question. Is this like some activist speech or something?

I think Null's best bet is that SCOTUS sends the Greer case back to appeals court and asks them to do it all over again. SCOTUS can do that, if they think the applicable laws/precedents have been ignored or misapplied.

I don't want any of the accelerationist crap that Null wants. This attitude of "If I can't play ball, I will kick the ball onto the roof so that no one else can play ball either" is really juvenile, but very on-brand for Null.

I do think that Null is just imagining things when he claims that the ACLU and EFF might now all of a sudden develop an interest in representing him in a SCOTUS case, when they both have refused all this time to represent him in the lower courts.

I also disagree with Null's decision to not go with a legal firm that specializes in SCOTUS cases. Any appeal before a higher court is a kind of specialty case, and hence it's better to have a lawyer who is specifically trained in that specialty branch of law.
 
@Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt I need a website pin bro I just can’t with Josh right now. My fucking sides are orbiting the sun as I type this

So Josh in his infamous Wisdom decided to tell EVERYONE that he spent 2/5ths of the $150,000 that wss supposed to be dedicated to suing Epik LLC. ON THIS SUPREME COURT FILING LMFAO
IMG_1721.jpeg

just simple math here but if this is true(Josh says it is so it must be true) that means at least 25% of the $150,000 was spent on this bullshit SC meaning around $30,000 to $50,000 DOLLARS

IMG_1719.jpeg


Even worse is that lawfags are also aware that Josh’s paperwork written by his lawfirm that charged his ass way too much money to even do this contradicts certain statements made that Josh asked for so it’s most likely going to be sent back and asked to correct things and REFILE

Ommmgggggg ahahahahahhahahahahahaaaaa
IMG_1717.jpeg



IMAGINE GIVING JOSHUA CONNOR MOON YOUR MONEY AND HE JUST THROWS IN THE TRASH
:story::story::story::story:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Gays From LA said:
Is there a reason you're spelling this consistently as copywrite instead of "copyright"? Not trolling, sincere question. Is this like some activist speech or something?

I think Null's best bet is that SCOTUS sends the Greer case back to appeals court and asks them to do it all over again. SCOTUS can do that, if they think the applicable laws/precedents have been ignored or misapplied.

I don't want any of the accelerationist crap that Null wants. This attitude of "If I can't play ball, I will kick the ball onto the roof so that no one else can play ball either" is really juvenile, but very on-brand for Null.

I do think that Null is just imagining things when he claims that the ACLU and EFF might now all of a sudden develop an interest in representing him in a SCOTUS case, when they both have refused all this time to represent him in the lower courts.

I also disagree with Null's decision to not go with a legal firm that specializes in SCOTUS cases. Any appeal before a higher court is a kind of specialty case, and hence it's better to have a lawyer who is specifically trained in that specialty branch of law.
Click to expand...
Im retarded and running low on coffee 😂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top