Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread

[fag0t]

shut the fuck up kike

 

[VAIDS Victim]

I've been vindicated in everything, and you fuckers still won't give me the credit I deserve for hacking kiwi farms and blowing the lid off this entire operation. What do you have to say now, onion freaks?

Odysseus was right.

You're welcome.

Defamation in the internet age: could a $400,000 Australian court ruling silence the notorious online forum Kiwi Farms?

An Australian company that helped the website remain accessible has been ordered to pay damages – but the legal arguments remain unsettled

t.co

You insects are so far beneath me you didn't even deserve this post.

I don't know what you're talking about. Why so angy?

 

[diamond heiress]

I don't know what you're talking about. Why so angy?

I'm not going to spoon feed you. I broke the details of Nulls confidant and best friend Vincent Zhen of Brisbane, and the twisted deals made to keep KF online. I did you insects the service of posting it here.

Wash my dishes, servant.

This article says I was right. Ofc.

 

[FruitFarmer]

Odysseus was a true onion farmer unlike Elaine lol.

 

[TheChattanoogaAshleyJank]

shut the fuck up kike

No, no keep going.

 

[TheChattanoogaAshleyJank]

"Red users treat any site that tolerates them like a whore. Any hole they can fill will work"

Does Josh like that??????????

You don't? You degenerate.

 

[ipreferpickles]

I wonder how long it will be before Null threatens to delete A&H again.

 

[ipreferpickles]

The Genders Wars are giving Null headaches.

 

[Chrysler Building]

View attachment 40996
View attachment 40997
View attachment 40998
The Genders Wars are giving Null headaches.

That last screencap reminds me of TERFs banning tranny failed males from a locker room....

 

[The Gays From LA]

What do you have to say now, onion freaks?

I have to say, , I never thought KiwiFarms would eventually turn into a scene from The Social Network, complete with BBFs suing one another, LMAO.

This scene below is Null and Vincent in a few months, when they realize that what's done is done and you can't just overturn a default judgement because you were too busy playing Dota2 on Steam to defend yourself against, and then Vincent realizes his only option to sue Null to force him to share the burden of the default judgement against him:

Vincent to Null: "I WAS YOUR ONLY FRIEND YOU SET ME UP!!!"

Odysseus was right.

If you think Ody was the first person to point out the Flow Chemical stuff you clearly weren't paying any attention during #DropKiwiFarms. While that campaign was happening, they were spreading around a .pdf document on Twitter where Liz Fong-Jones himself had laid out the whole construct with Flow Chemical acting as a conduit for Null to obtain a range through the Australian RIR. Ody certainly wasn't the first to discover this about KF.

 

[Ashley Hutsell JankowskiAshley Hutsell Jankowski is verified member.]

View attachment 40996
View attachment 40997
View attachment 40998
The Genders Wars are giving Null headaches.

It's really funny when a bunch of middle aged men shaped like the clown demon from Spawn and have cluster B personality disorders start obsessing about how unfuckable and evil the terfs are

 

[Ashley Hutsell JankowskiAshley Hutsell Jankowski is verified member.]

The only place you can find adult men who are this scared of seeing women talk is in ISIS. Looks like the reactionaries aren't your friends just because they also hate the troons, ladies

 

[TheChattanoogaAshleyJank]

It's really funny when a bunch of middle aged men shaped like the clown demon from Spawn and have cluster B personality disorders start obsessing about how unfuckable and evil the terfs are

Hey look everyone, Ashley Hutsell Jankowski.

Why are you using this website? I thought you didn't want to be associated with it.

 

[TheChattanoogaAshleyJank]

Again, what a retarded psycho. Do you wanna use this site or not?

Ken actually moved the host to Panama because I got it knocked off the internet for a few days because I complained. I think I'm just going to contact his work and tell them he's discussing patient information on his stalking site. All of you belong in prison and I'm fucking sick of looking at you or thinking about what you're doing to other people.

 

[The Gays From LA]

Here you go guys, here's #DropKiwiFarms spreading the .pdf about Vincent's Flow Chemical enabling Null to obtain an IP space through the Australian RIR, APNIC :

Again, Odysseus did not discover any this, he merely came to OnionFarms to regurgitate the same information that #DropKiwiFarms had already been posting all over Twitter for months before he picked it up and claimed it as his own exclusive scoop.

 

[Rez]

odyseeus was elaine jeez

 

[The Gays From LA]

What I find particularly disturbing about that article in The Guardian celebrating Liz Fong-Jones' default judgement against Vincent is that previously The Guardian, for years, had published many articles denouncing libel tourism in the UK. Look at the search results here:

libel tourism, website:theguardian.com - Bing

La búsqueda inteligente de Bing facilita la búsqueda en menos tiempo de todo lo que buscas y, además, te da premios.

www.bing.com

Look at all the articles from The Guardian, particularly in between 2009-2013, where they were denouncing libel tourism in the UK as a threat to free speech world-wide... but now that Australia has become the new libel tourism destination, now all of a sudden The Guardian is celebrating libel tourism as a good thing? Fucking turncoat hypocrites.

Null needs to find a defense attorney who's experienced with fighting libel tourism cases in Australia:

Abstract
The phenomenon of ‘libel tourism’ has caused tension between the United States and the United Kingdom. The issue highlights the differences between American and English defamation laws and conflict of laws rules. Both in the United States and the United Kingdom, there has been legislation proposed or enacted to address the real or perceived problem of ‘libel tourism’. This article analyses ‘libel tourism’ and the responses to it in both countries. Given that Australia’s defamation laws and conflict of laws rules are arguably more restrictive than those of the United Kingdom, this article examines the prospect of Australia becoming an attractive destination for ‘libel tourism’.

David Rolph, ‘Splendid Isolation? Australia as a Destination for Libel Tourism’ (2012) 19 Austl Int’l LJ 81

https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUIntLawJl/2012/5.pdf

Steve Hind is one of the people thanked in the above essay... and lo behold, he's a Guardian journalist too:

Steve Hind | The Guardian

Steve Hind is a Sydney-based strategy consultant. He blogs (sometimes) at The Hindsite Blog and has economics and law degrees from the University of Sydney. He has won the World Universities Debating Championship, and the World Schools Debating Championship, as both a student and as coach of the...

www.theguardian.com

Blogger: Perfil de usuario: Steve Hind

Blogger es una herramienta de publicación de blogs de Google para compartir con facilidad tus pensamientos con el mundo. Con Blogger, publicar textos, fotos y videos en tu blog personal o de equipo es fácil.

www.blogger.com

ABSTRACT
Libel tourism is the phenomenon whereby litigants issue libel claims in inappropriate fora in order to avail themselves of the pro-claimant laws therein. For years, London held the reputation as the global capital for libel tourism. However, following controversy in this area in the 2000s and passage of both the US SPEECH Act and Defamation Act 2013, the debate surrounding the libel tourism has taken several new directions. Many commentators now wonder whether libel tourists, deprived of a haven in London, will flock to fora with more pro-claimant regimes. Others go further, suggesting that libel tourism has the potential to flare up once more in England and that the 2013 Act leaves the door open to libel tourists. Some scholars have even asserted that such is the danger, an international convention must be established to ensure that the blight of libel tourism is finally slain. This article investigates how realistic and desirable these new developments in the debate are.

False havens: assessing new developments in the libel tourism debate by Jack Larkin

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17577632.2019.1679425

David Rolph, ‘Australia: Social Media and Defamation Law Pose Threats to Free Speech, and It’s Time for Reform’ Inforrm (17 September 2016)

Australia: Social media and defamation law pose threats to free speech, and it’s time for reform – David Rolph

Recent discussion about freedom of speech in Australia has focused almost exclusively on Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. For some politicians and commentators, 18C is the greatest cha…

inforrm.wordpress.com

Abstract
In December of 2002, the High Court of Australia issued its decision in Dow Jones & Co. v. Gutnick, holding that Dow Jones could be haled into court in Australia for the publication of defamatory material on the Internet. This decision was surprising because the material in question was published in the United States on Dow Jones's New Jersey web servers. This decision makes Australia the only country that allows an action against a foreign defendant based solely on an Internet download in that country. However, the structure of the Gutnick opinion may open the door for other countries to follow the High Court's example. The Gutnick decision raises concerns that the territorial borders of speech protection could break down in the Internet Age. Laws regarding the balance between free speech and the protection of reputation vary widely among nations. However, the Australian court ignored the implications that the breakdown of the borders between jurisdictions could have on this balance, and instead mechanically applied historical precedent to the Internet. This strict application to the Internet of precedent created for off-line publication may produce a chilling effect on Internet speech worldwide by reducing the level of speech protection on the Internet to the lowest common denominator. The Gutnick decision's narrow focus on precedent does not offer sufficient protection to international free speech, and the Australian Parliament should adopt a jurisdictional rule to protect Internet speakers that do not aim their speech at Australia.

Nathan Garnett, ‘Dow Jones & Co v Gutnick: Will Australia’s Long Jurisdictional Reach Chill Internet Speech World-Wide?’ (2004) Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 61.

Dow Jones & Co. v. Gutnick: Will Australia's Long Jurisdictional Reach Chill Internet Speech World-Wide? Comments 13 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 2004

Copyright 0 2004 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal AssociationDOW JONES & CO. v. GUTNICK: WILL AUSTRALIA'SLONG JURISDICTIONAL REACH CHILL INTERNETSPEECH WORLD-WIDE?Nathan W. GarnetttAbstract: In December of 2002, the High Court of Australia issued its decision inDow Jones & Co. v. Gutnick...

heinonline.org

 

[The Gays From LA]

Here's the TorrentFreak article about the Greer verdict:

Kiwi Farms' Copyright Battle Could Spell Bad News for DMCA Transparency * TorrentFreak

The U.S. Court of Appeals concludes that Kiwi Farms operator Joshua Moon can be held liable for copyright infringement.

torrentfreak.com

Archived: https://archive.ph/ruQ0x

 

[Not enough minerals Not enough]

View attachment 40994
I wonder how long it will be before Null threatens to delete A&H again.

That was quite a read, Josh needs to take Benadryl more often.

The Genders Wars are giving Null headaches.

He's going through menopause, it's normal.

 

[ipreferpickles]