It is NOT guaranteed to work, dawg.
Race, Religion, Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Gender or Gender Identity: We don't care. If you can swing with us, you are one of us. Kiwifarms or Mainstream are equally welcome.
Note: It's over Ashley. Over and done.No: Lowcowery is not white supremacy and never has been. It crosses all cultures
🧅Project Timeline🧅
🧅Repair Orders🧅
🧅Repair Orders🧅
E-Mail Verification system should be fixed
🧅Forum Building🧅🧅 Community Feature Submissions 🧅
- Signup age has been raised back up to 17 from 16 based on AI Research
- Nicki Minaj Praises Elon Musk for His "Contributions to Humanity" in SpaceX Appearance
- Vance Urges Israel Not to Criticize Trump-Iran Deal
- Scarlett Hampton Explodes at Ethan Ralph
- Toddler in Critical Condition After Stranger Throws Him into Crocodile Enclosure
- Kim Kardashian and Kanye West's Daughter North West Announces 14-Date North American Tour After Releasing Debut EP
- VeryDarkMan Storms Oyo Government House, Challenges Governor Makinde to Personally Rescue Kidnapped School Children
- President of Somaliland and his Delegation make a Historic Visit to Israel: Somalia is pissed off over it.
- Ignorant and antisemetic: Who cares what religion your employer is
KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution
- Thread starter The Crimson Fucker
- Start date
These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Boobie Bomb
An Onion Among Onions
Obscenity2022
Hellovan Onion
first off, that user is the same retard who hates King Chuck, and would hate having his woke opinions be absolute authority over the population. 2nd off, "Luxury beliefs" have been the norm among the upper class since the 1930s meaning chances are any monarchy would be a monarchy of the woke. the idea that the upper class would know or care about the poor native citizens is insane especially when its fairly easy to find out their beliefs at any given time.
i just hate kiwifarms so much
Kiwi Pot Pie
Hellovan Onion
>UK
>Sweden
>Spain
>Belgium
>Netherlands
>Norway
>Denmark
All monarchies and all countries that hate their indigenous White population where the asshole with the crown celebrates White replacement and destruction of local culture daily. This has to be an American who probably identifies as 25% Italian 25% German 50% Irish and thinks that makes them European.
Boobie Bomb
An Onion Among Onions
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark
An Onion Among Onions
Monarchies historically have always been a crapshoot.
For every Cyrus the Great and Alfred the Great and Emperor Meiji (good leaders), you get a fuck ton of Ivan the Terribles and a fuck ton of Nero Ceasars and a fuck ton of King Leopold IIs (bad leaders and they're examples as to why checks and balances on a government are a good thing).
Having a monarch being a good leader is a once in a lifetime thing where you may be lucky to experience a good period of intellectual richness and prosperity followed by another bad period that makes life Hell for everyone for a generation or two or longer than that. If you give absolute power to a genuinely good person then sure things will be awesome but when you give asbolute power to a terrible person (which was often the case) then you have to deal with it until the ruler dies of natural causes or gets murdered (either killed by another royal that seeks the throne or through a pesant revolt as a last resort).
Don't get me started in how monarchs with power treat the vulnerable for their degenerate sexual gratification.
If you know anything about the history of China's royalty (from their emperors to their nobility), it is riddled with sordid histories of rich and powerful men along with rich and powerful women taking advantage of kids for their own sexual gratification.
The European monarchs of the time were no better either (depending on which period we are talking about the monarchs weren't really tradpilled either). While sodomy laws existed in countries like pre-democratic England and pre-democratic France, it was pretty common to have the royals sexually abuse young boys and young girls in those days and they often got away with it because they could bribe a court or win the king's favor or do favors for the judges to avoid a conviction (the laws were for the masses, not for the classes just like what you see today). If a boy was being sexually abused by a royal, often the royal would cover that up. If a young girl was abused, the best case scenario is that the abused girl may just be dismissed by the court and the royals pretend this never happened.
While the UK's royal family as we know them today has become symbolic these days since Queen Victoria, even the FBI heavily suspected several members of the British royal family to be degenerate pedophiles back in the 1940's.
Is democracy inefficient and often stagnant? Yes it is. But you're better off having an inefficient government than having a government where the absolute powerful that hardly have any checks and balances on them can get away with even murder.
When you are rich and powerful, you can get away with anything (this has been true back then and this is true now).
Why would you want to give a corrupt government more power to stop pedophile Muslims? The elites have always never cared about you and anyone that is retarded enough to think giving a corrupt government more power to solve these kinds of issues is just asking to have their hands above the wall when the authoritarian government they supported will betray them in the end. I really hope that anyone that advocates for absolute monarchy on Kiwi Farms is in the minority there because holy fuck you have to be a big retard to advocate for absolute monarchy.
Benevolent dictators will always be exceptionally rare.
For every Cyrus the Great and Alfred the Great and Emperor Meiji (good leaders), you get a fuck ton of Ivan the Terribles and a fuck ton of Nero Ceasars and a fuck ton of King Leopold IIs (bad leaders and they're examples as to why checks and balances on a government are a good thing).
Having a monarch being a good leader is a once in a lifetime thing where you may be lucky to experience a good period of intellectual richness and prosperity followed by another bad period that makes life Hell for everyone for a generation or two or longer than that. If you give absolute power to a genuinely good person then sure things will be awesome but when you give asbolute power to a terrible person (which was often the case) then you have to deal with it until the ruler dies of natural causes or gets murdered (either killed by another royal that seeks the throne or through a pesant revolt as a last resort).
Don't get me started in how monarchs with power treat the vulnerable for their degenerate sexual gratification.
If you know anything about the history of China's royalty (from their emperors to their nobility), it is riddled with sordid histories of rich and powerful men along with rich and powerful women taking advantage of kids for their own sexual gratification.
The European monarchs of the time were no better either (depending on which period we are talking about the monarchs weren't really tradpilled either). While sodomy laws existed in countries like pre-democratic England and pre-democratic France, it was pretty common to have the royals sexually abuse young boys and young girls in those days and they often got away with it because they could bribe a court or win the king's favor or do favors for the judges to avoid a conviction (the laws were for the masses, not for the classes just like what you see today). If a boy was being sexually abused by a royal, often the royal would cover that up. If a young girl was abused, the best case scenario is that the abused girl may just be dismissed by the court and the royals pretend this never happened.
While the UK's royal family as we know them today has become symbolic these days since Queen Victoria, even the FBI heavily suspected several members of the British royal family to be degenerate pedophiles back in the 1940's.
Is democracy inefficient and often stagnant? Yes it is. But you're better off having an inefficient government than having a government where the absolute powerful that hardly have any checks and balances on them can get away with even murder.
When you are rich and powerful, you can get away with anything (this has been true back then and this is true now).
Why would you want to give a corrupt government more power to stop pedophile Muslims? The elites have always never cared about you and anyone that is retarded enough to think giving a corrupt government more power to solve these kinds of issues is just asking to have their hands above the wall when the authoritarian government they supported will betray them in the end. I really hope that anyone that advocates for absolute monarchy on Kiwi Farms is in the minority there because holy fuck you have to be a big retard to advocate for absolute monarchy.
Benevolent dictators will always be exceptionally rare.
Last edited:
Kiwismarms
Hellovan Onion
Kiwi Pot Pie
Hellovan Onion
Muslims won't steal your six figure lego collection and put you in jail for complaining about it.
Nektar Geist
An Onion Among Onions
https://grokipedia.com/page/Consanguinity_in_Somali_populations
Yeah, ofc... retard. Whose yer mommysister?
Roy Moore is a disgusting Islamophobic pedophile, BTW.
And the current government in the U.S. is aiding and abetting actual pedophiles.
Something that KF is not angry enough about.
Speaking of which...
Despite what morons like this fail to realize, Trump is STILL genuinely a lunatic and a fucking moron, even more so than ShortFatOtaku's relatively ineffectual stupidass, turning ICE into a shittier version of the police, refusing to bring justice to the victims of Epstein, his equally disgusting pedophile faggot conspirators, and other enablers, and starting a dumbass war against Iran that cost billions and resulted in severe damage to many U.S. military bases abroad as well as Lebanon.