Sarah took Lexity back in: "The cool thing about a sugar mama is that when they mess up, the apology comes with a lot of gifts." - Is Sarah a victim or an enabler? - Sarah is a female GAMP (female trannie chaser/woman with a "feminized male" fetish) - "Sugar momma"/"Sugar daddy" is a form of prostitution
So Sarah and Lexity are back together again, because some women just insist on being a troon's doormat:
Archiving this post because this looks like exactly the kind of post the troon mods on /r/lexity would censor:
Archived:
https://archive.is/jSZn5
When are we going to stop pretending Sarah is a victim and admit she’s a co-abuser of her own child and animals?vent/rant (self.lexity)
submitted by Hopeful-Sprinkles610
Idk what is going on. I saw a post yesterday welcoming someone who has paid the way for Lexity to abuse other adults, and now she’s giving her small people and animals to abuse, and paying her for being abusive by buying her new things and reinforcing the bad behavior. And she’s almost 40?? Come on. I don’t want her here. I can’t imagine victims who are only victims because Sarah funded their suffering want her here, either. She’s gone out of her way to discredit the victims here and doesn’t care about her own child.
She’s a monster, same as Lexity.
Just so we're clear here: "sugar momma"/"sugar daddy" is simply a form of prostitution. The people involved in this type of arrangement don't call it what it is, because prostitition is illegal and they are trying to evade being held accountable for breaking the law by using vague terms that falsely reference familial relationships to white-wash what they're doing. This Sarah woman is a single mother who works as an accountant and has a toddler that she allows Lexity to interact with. Lexity refers to Sarah as both "my sugar momma" and as "my girlfriend", but this is to mislead and misdirect. Sarah is enabling, in other words essentially paying, Lexity to live with her, to play with her child and to have sex with her. Lexity is Sarah's live-in gigolo, in other words. Just because it's an older 37 year old woman paying a younger 25 year old man for sex and companionship doesn't change the nature of the relationship. The relationship between Sarah and Lexity is 100% transactional, so it's prostitution.
I don't know anything about this Sarah woman other than her being an accountant, which explains how she has the discretionary income to spend on a gigolo. Sarah is a female GAMP or gynandromorphophile, a female trannie chaser in other words, a woman who is sexually attracted to a feminized male. Despite being a succesful professional who should logically be a capitalist hypergamous female, Sarah strikes me as someone with extremely low self-esteem. No woman needs to pay a man for sex, it's men who pay women for sex. This has been one of the rules of nature since the dawn of man. But Sarah has such low self-esteem and thinks she's so unworthy of a normal relationship between equals, that she's willing to violate the rules of nature and pay a man for sex. Sarah could get on a dating app right now and find literally dozens of men nearby who are kinder, better and more together than Lexity in any perceivable way, yet she chooses to be with the troon. Worse, Sarah involves her child in her sexual fetish.
I love how these age-gap apologists on Reddit always pretend to ignore the transactional nature of the relationship they are trying to justify:
If Lexity and Sarah were, say, both professional accountants with their own respective income and houses, sure, who cares if some 35 year old single mother wants to bang a 25 year old colleague in her spare time, as long as it's consensual and discreet. They're adults, they can do what they want. But that's not what this is. Sarah has a sexual fetish, GAMP, and is right now wasting money, time and energy that should've been spent on her own child, in pursuit of that sexual fetish. Lexity only associates with Sarah as his financial and material enabler. Lexity lives in Sarah's house and, now, has a $5 monthly lease on the house. Lexity uses Sarah's facilities and subsequently has sex with Sarah in exchange for access to those facilities. Having sex with someone so you can use their bathroom, shower, WIFI, garage, kitchen, etc., is a form of prostitution. Just because Lexity enjoys having sex with Sarah and calls her "beautiful" doesn't change what this is.
BTW, if you know anything about narcs, when a narc is banging someone they genuinely consider to be a trophy, they immediately want to show them off. Recall the incident that Aziel described in the Google Doc, where he was half-sleeping on Vivian's couch right after arriving at his place, and Vivian immedialy took a picture of Aziel sleeping and shared it on Instagram to show off his latest "catch". Aziel realized he was being photographed, got mad at being non-consensually snapped and made Vivian delete the Instagram picture, but this is what narcs do when they consider someone to be a catch: they have to show them off to inflate their own self-worth. On the other hand, when a narc is with someone they consider to be a "meh", someone they are only transactionally involved with, they might tell you they're "beautiful" but they'll never actually show them off. We saw this in the Vivian Strange Google Doc too, with the way Vivian refused to allow his friends to meet Serafina, while trash talking Serafina to his friends, saying he no longer loved him, etc. Vivian only began showing off Serafina during Livestreams and referring to him as his "wife" after he was dumped by all his friends. Likewise, the reason why Lexity will not show off Sarah is because he considers her a "meh". If Sarah was a trophy, Lexity would be begging her to be on every single Livestream with him.
Once you recognize these patterns with narcs they are very easy to discern.
Anyways, ex-Sweet Peas are so pissed off, they're now threatening to track down the biological father of Sarah's child to let him know that Sarah is allowing a crazy, drug-addicted troon around their child:
Archived:
https://archive.is/F9Tcy
Not even KiwiFarms or lolcow.farms would sink this low.
Ex-Sweet Peas, who are cucked by their troon moderators, are thus even more vindictive towards Lexity's sugar momma than lolcow or even KF are willing to be. This is what happens when you don't allow a woman to call a man a man.
I obviously don't know anything about Sarah other than what I've read online, but if I had to go off of the vibes I'm picking up here, then I suspect Sarah has severe self-esteem issues. Like I said, it's abnormal for a woman to pay a man for sex, any woman who does this does not trust her natural, feminine power to attract a man, and this lack of trust in herself indicates a woman with severe self-esteem issues. I suspect Sarah likely imagined a very normal mommy-daddy-baby kind of family life for herself and her kid, but when her baby daddy left her alone with a baby, Sarah's perception of the world, of herself and of her future kinda crumbled and disintegrated along with her self-esteem. That was the moment Sarah become a female degenerate, a female GAMP. I bet Sarah never considered dating or fuqing a troon before that moment. I suspect Sarah is adjusting very badly to being a single mother and was genuinely feeling lonely when she zeroed in Lexity and essentially paid him/showered him with gifts, until he agreed to spend time with her. I suspect she brought Lexity in due to what I call "Bored Housewife Syndrome".
and "able to fight off infections". Troons are immune-compromised because the HRT fucks up their metabolism and they get sick easier. A lot of troons died during Covid because they are inherently sickened and weakened by the HRT. Lexity, in his infinite arrogance, will get infected with something much stronger than him eventually, and he will pass it around as he lies about his health status in order to get laid by strangers.
