Updates to Website

All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.

For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.

There are issues with missing attachments. I am looking into this.


Topics of Interest

Kiwifarms Gossip & Slap Fights Kiwifarms Down a Lot

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
20230917_150931.jpg
 
The last casualty of the Israel-Palestine War is Kiwifarms' database.
It is currently shitting itself.

1696901610818.png


Josh's piss poor coding skills most affected.
Some things never change!
 
Null is in trouble again, this time with Cogent and the Dutch non-profit AbuseIO which is run by this guy:

We have two hosts in Poland who are directly being forced to take us down after months of up-time. These are the links that Cogent is complaining about to hosts, but not to me:

Commercial Pornography

Voluntary Pornography

Leaks of Public Interest

Not even porn but they keep calling this child porn when it's a fat kid watching a fucking shock video


I'm not sure if deleting them will even satisfy Cogent because they refuse to talk to me, and the CEO is directly involved in trying to censor the forum.


Edit: Open source abuse database AbuseIO is also either directly involved or just complicity being taken advantage of. If you're involved, get in touch.




I've had reports that certain networks are blocking IPs.
Null · Post #154 · Today at 12:52 PM · Forum: Forum Discussion

 
Null is in trouble again, this time with Cogent and the Dutch non-profit AbuseIO which is run by this guy:





Interesting Cogent Communications adheres to net neutrality:
https://www.cogentco.com/en/net-neutrality
Null on MATI today showed off the new KF censorship notice. Apparently Null tried to appease Cogent by removing some of the images and videos they had linked to in their notice to him:

View attachment 41132View attachment 41133

And it looks like they cut them off anyway. Meaning the reasons given were total bullshit from the beginning. They probably thought Null was going to blow them off, either that or didn't expect the ISPs to tell him. This is so unbelievably stupid that it's almost funny. Or would be if it wasn't dangerous as well.

So much for the moronic "Null brings it on himself by not playing along nicely/politely with the censors" cope. I wonder if people will still try to pretend this isn't about cancel culture or censorship and all about how rude he is.. or whatever the excuses are.
 
Suddenly I can't get onto the site and Chrome shows this message:


Your connection is not private​

Attackers might be trying to steal your information from www.kiwifarms.st (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). Learn more
NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID

To get Chrome’s highest level of security, turn on enhanced protection
ReloadHide advanced
www.kiwifarms.st normally uses encryption to protect your information. When Chrome tried to connect to www.kiwifarms.st this time, the website sent back unusual and incorrect credentials. This may happen when an attacker is trying to pretend to be www.kiwifarms.st, or a Wi-Fi sign-in screen has interrupted the connection. Your information is still secure because Chrome stopped the connection before any data was exchanged.
You cannot visit www.kiwifarms.st right now because the website uses HSTS. Network errors and attacks are usually temporary, so this page will probably work later.
 
its gnu/linux
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux,
is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux.
Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component
of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell
utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day,
without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU
which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are
not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a
part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system
that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run.
The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself;
it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is
normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system
is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux"
distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
 
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux,
is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux.
Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component
of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell
utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day,
without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU
which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are
not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a
part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system
that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run.
The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself;
it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is
normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system
is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux"
distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?

(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies wherever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it.

You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument.

Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD?

If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this:

Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag.

Thanks for listening.
 
Back
Top