🧅Project Timeline🧅
Movie-House Project: projected completion- next week.
🧅Repair Orders🧅
🧅Forum Building🧅
Lots of drama related to Very Dark Man that I want to tie together

🧅 Community Feature Submissions 🧅

KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
General Discussion: users, bad takes, jannys, Null, etc
Tom Homan's Alien Removals said:
Digital IDs are the first step in turning a society into a total panopticon. Becoming a nanny state is just not worth it.

In fact, that kind of enforcement based on government IDs and government records is what China does and what the UK is probably going to implement via their Online Safety Act.
Click to expand...
You're going to be very hard pressed to find any parents and legalizators that are willing to let the Internet continue being a Wild West and let kids access whatever they want online.

If there is going to be age verification (it's going to happen anyway) then I prefer that this is done on an operating system level because this puts the burden on state governments and operating system developers rather than putting the burden on websites.

If there is going to be age verification for the Internet then I prefer that websites aren't heavily burdened with this and pushes for incentives for state governments to update their cybersecurity practices and incentivize operating system developers to adopt better cybersecurity standards for their operating systems.
 
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark said:
You're going to be very hard pressed to find any parents and legalizators that are willing to let the Internet continue being a Wild West and let kids access whatever they want online.

If there is going to be age verification (it's going to happen anyway) then I prefer that this is done on an operating system level because this puts the burden on state governments and operating system developers rather than putting the burden on websites.

If there is going to be age verification for the Internet then I prefer that websites aren't heavily burdened with this and pushes for incentives for state governments to update their cybersecurity practices and incentivize operating system developers to adopt better cybersecurity standards for their operating systems.
Click to expand...
Nightmare scenario for everyone.
 
AshleyBloatedSwalloHole said:
Nightmare scenario for everyone.
Click to expand...
I don't like it either but what can we do?

Me personally I prefer that the Internet remains wild and free because this is what made the Internet fun and enjoyable to begin with.

But if there is going to be age verification (which is most likely going to happen) then I prefer that there is a compromise that satisfies all parties involved.
George Lucas said:
It seems SaveTheLoli was banned or changed his name. Does anyone know where he went?
Click to expand...
They got banned months ago after being in a spat with Jersh.

Jersh changed their username and he banned them because Jersh is petty like that.
 
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark said:
I don't like it either but what can we do?

Me personally I prefer that the Internet remains wild and free because this is what made the Internet fun and enjoyable to begin with.

But if there is going to be age verification (which is most likely going to happen) then I prefer that there is a compromise that satisfies all parties involved.
Click to expand...
It was giving moderation power to people with zero accountability and pretending they wouldn’t abuse it that killed the old internet.
 
IMG_1982.jpeg

IMG_1983.gif
 
George Lucas said:
It’s annoying that people I start to consider being friends with end up getting banned. This site is turning into a revolving door of nchan rejects.
Click to expand...
I haven't actually used an image board in almost a decade.
 
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark said:
If there is going to be age verification (it's going to happen anyway) then I prefer that this is done on an operating system level because this puts the burden on state governments and operating system developers rather than putting the burden on websites.
Click to expand...
It's not their responsibility it's the websites responsibility. That's like demanding id verification built on guns by the manufacturer so only the owner can use them. It's not their responsibility to ensure that. If they can do that then they can brick your operating system on whim just like Nintendo switch 2 will be able to. It will probably be snuck in as part of the parental lock. This is the same ransomware shit skins in India use to scam old ladies built in as a feature.
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark said:
But if there is going to be age verification (which is most likely going to happen) then I prefer that there is a compromise that satisfies all parties involved.
Click to expand...
This isn't it. And it won't stop them from abusing their power.
 
Reason: Once people are explained that it's basically ransomware they wouldn't like it either. The free company that can do what they want will not stop at parental lock, they can block websites (like KF) being accessed on their os for adults with a tos update.
Last edited:
Crimson Fucker said:
It's not their responsibility it's the websites responsibility. That's like demanding id verification built on guns by the manufacturer so only the owner can use them. It's not their responsibility to ensure that. If they can do that then they can brick your operating system on whim just like Nintendo switch 2 will be able to. It will probably be snuck in as part of the parental lock. This is the same ransomware shit skins in India use to scam old ladies built in as a feature.

This isn't it. And it won't stop them from abusing their power.
Click to expand...
ALternatively, we could re-legalize beating children who don't obey.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom