🧅Project Timeline🧅
Movie-House Project: projected completion- next week.
🧅Repair Orders🧅
🧅Forum Building🧅
Lots of drama related to Very Dark Man that I want to tie together

🧅 Community Feature Submissions 🧅

  • The People of Interest single threads have not been eliminated. They have simply been reorganized under a new forum (New World Lolcows General)

Null 🥝 Joshua Moon Megathread

Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
Youthful Shannel said:
You know, I'm not mad at Josh putting so much of his energy into the anti-Vivek guy, he usually just gripes and moans, it's good to see him be proactive.
Click to expand...
"Proactive" implies he's actually doing something that will change minds among serious politicians, when he's really just harassing random aides and secretaries and sending angry tweets while encouraging his paypigs and desperate rightoids to do the same. I wonder how far he'll take this before he either gives up and leaves America again or says the wrong thing and gets in trouble.
 
null 1.pngnull 2.pngnull 3.pngnull 4.pngnull 5.png
 
Kiwifarms is now a forum about American christofascism applied to petty culture war issues. I mean, it has been that for a while, but the fact that nearly every feature is about some flavor of the week culture war incident and the Saint Kirk bans have cemented it as so.
 
I don't think Section 230 is going to get fully repealed anytime soon because the Internet as a whole (whether it's Big Tech companies like Google to small niche communities like Kiwi Farms) still benefit from its liability protections and most likely Big Tech will lobby their way to kill any efforts to fully end Section 230 in Congress (lobbying groups like NetChoice are still big players in how Congress shapes laws for the Internet as we know it). Trump doesn't even fully agree with completely regulating the Internet as he just signed an executive order recently that strips the states of regulating AI and letting the White House and the federal government lead the path on AI through the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution for a more freer and less regulated AI landscape.

The liability protections provided by Section 230 is literately the reason why the Internet as we know it exists to begin with; it's the only reason why websites like Kiwi Farms, 4chan, and even Onionfarms, and so on haven't been sued into oblivion by obnoxious moralfagging Karens looking to police people for thoughtcrime online.

Most likely this "Bipartisian" effort to repeal Section 230 (which is disingenuous anyway because a bill can have a fuck ton of Democrats supporting it but only have a few Republicans on board as "Bipartisian" is being really dishonest) will most likely die in Congress citing the obvious flaws that by not providing online platforms liability protections will lead to more censorship.

So what do I think may happen instead? We may get Trump's vision to have an Internet Bill of Rights be enacted in Congress instead which would grant online platforms liability protections from the content they host while at the same time penalize Big Tech for in engaging in bad faith censorship. This is what I think may happen.

I don't see Section 230 fully going away anytime soon but I do see reforms with the controversial law where you will still have liability protections for online platforms only this time Big Tech can't abuse their power to censor things they don't like anyway.
 
Last edited:
Josh should put his money where his mouth is and donate to Casey Putsch's campaign, ask his users to donate to his campaign, ask they volunteer for his campaign, and help canvas for him by going door to door telling the people of Ohio about how this guy they never heard of is the winning ticket. I'm sure it'll go about as well as his friend Vinnie's lawsuit against Dong Gone. Does he really think this weak slacktivism is really going to do anything?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom