I actively watched and listened to the entire video.
His arguments run cover for basically every right-wing spook: immigration is bad, diversity is bad, DEI is bad, supporting Ukraine is bad, etc. His main thesis is that all of these points are a mere facade covering the greatest threat of all (which is definitely not a left-wing spook): Nazism and Putin, and that Putin has paid off popular creators to popularize Nazism so that the US is weakened.
He suffers tremendously from not addressing what I call 'presuppositions', which is a real word but I use it in a specific way. I realized as a teenager listening to Atheist vs. Creationist debates that there's no way to have a real productive conversation between those two groups because they cannot make their arguments in a way that is accepted by the opposition. This is because our knowledge is built on a stack of assumed truths I call presuppositions, and in conversation you expect your partner to presuppose certain things. In a disagreement, you will unwittingly analyze your presuppositions to find the most fundamental difference between yours and your partner's, then tackle that difference to try and convince them to realign with you. Consider the following:
"Evolution is real." "It is not, God created mankind in his image." "There is evidence of evolution." "The evidence is planted by the Devil." "There is no Devil." "The Devil is real, he is mentioned in the Bible." "The Bible is a collection of fairy tails." "The Bible is the truth." "It was written by fallible men." "It is the word of God." "There is no God." "God is real." <- That is the fundamental presuppositional difference, and it is so fundamental that these two parties cannot approach the topic of Creationism productively.
Left vs. Right dichotomy has become increasingly unhinged over the last 10 years and that is because the foundational presuppositional difference between the two sides has gotten so far apart that productive conversation is impossible.
Consider the stack of presuppositions that someone like LazerPig would have to break down to figure out the core difference between himself and an avowed antisemitic neo-Nazi. I believe i know what that difference is.
"Liberals" like LazerPig believe that: (1) things used to be ok, (2) things are better now, and (3) things will continue to be ok and get better.
"Conservative" normies believe that: (1) things used to be ok, (2) things are worse now, and (3) things could get better with some change.
"Extremists" believe that: (1) things used to be fucked, (2) things are really fucked, and (3) things will get so incredibly fucked.
I believe this is the fundamental difference, and it's because it is a presupposition based on how you feel. If you don't feel like things are OK, how you view a myriad of things is different. Same with your opinion of the recent past (esp before your lifetime that you did not experience) and optimism for the future. These three feelings dictate how you will analyze facts presented to you. LazerPig, and all men, build what they believe to be true based on how they feel about the trajectory of their society. If you feel like things are doing poorly, you will quickly realize you have very little in agreement with someone who feels things are doing quite well.
That is the core difference, and LazerPig falls very neatly alongside Destiny. I've previously said that Destiny is the political alignment he is because there is no other timeline where Destiny would be paid millions of dollars and offered an endless buffet of BPD pussy other than the timeline we currently live in. LazerPig, as a gross fat homosexual, is in an identical situation. That is why they love the status quo and want more of it.
If LazerPig allowed himself to think things are getting worse because of domestic policy, especially contemporary policy like mass immigration, then you open the door to reform. Radical change could result in their gravy train and bug chasing adventures ending in a mass grave under one of two red flags. For someone like him, he has to completely shut down any change. In order to be a gay bear backpacking and bugchasing across a worry-free Europe that is a stranger to war, Europe must remain liberal, it must be a part of NATO, and NATO must continue to dominate the entire world to maintain Pax Americana.
The mild conservative is willing to undo a lot of things, even if it means throwing out gay marriage and 30 million immigrants. That threatens the gay bathroom cruising and BPD pussy chasing lifestyles of LP & Destiny. The extremist will go so far as to say the wrong side won World War 2 and want to undo everything since the New Deal. That's an even bigger threat, which is why taking that position must be linked with the Holocaust and Russia (as these two spooks create the foundation for our understanding of our country's past and present).
This is also why I think so many young minorities become socialists under the Hasan banner. They don't believe that the past was OK, as believing the past was OK means that colonialism and racism was OK. As they're not from that era of our history, there's nothing of it they wish to conserve. So since they don't like the past, and no young person is doing well in the present, they turn to socialism.
This just feels like venting. He's trying to convince people that the status quo is a good thing, actually. Meanwhile, the young minds (dumb Timmy) is not debating minutia of how to help black people achieve more, or how to train police better: they're talking about either installing afro-centric communism vs. deporting every dark skinned person to Africa, or abolishing the police vs. instituting a police state to get rid of the mexicans. He concludes on saying "send me your pepe because I lost the culture war", which is true. He did.
