Content In The Spotlight 🧅

Project Updates

Onionchat.net is being set up. An Open source chat app will be set up and from there we will have a new chat plugin developed for Onionfarms.com
  • Welcome to Onionfarms. All races, ethnicities, religions. Gay, straight, bisexual. CIS or trans. It makes no difference to us. If you can rock with us, you are one of us. We are here for you and always will be.

  • Blogs and Opinions and Q&A is your blog as well as your Questions and Answers forum.

Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
Null hates the DSP board because they're the only group (until the soyteens joined) who would talk back to him. I've seen some people say that they donate the most out of any other group on KF, so that's the only reason he hasn't gone on his big banning sprees there.
Jewsh and their jannies are also not afraid to ban most of the DSP board either. Like when they got rid of all the mods and half the users on the DSP board a few years ago for no reason.
 
null really needs to stay way from the DSP board
on a related note phil troll pipes of peace made a tweet making fun of null
which earned him a block

and the post he made literally a few mins ago as i was capping for this post
Josh “I hate men who cry” Moon crying about the DSP board instead of putting his nuts on the table.
 
these first two are the same post it was just long
nulldsp12.png

nulldsp13.png


nulldsp14.png

Jewsh and their jannies are also not afraid to ban most of the DSP board either. Like when they got rid of all the mods and half the users on the DSP board a few years ago for no reason.
most of it was after Null threw a hussy fit about someone making a dear feeder joker about him
 
Some notes on the latest MATI:

Since you're still listening to MATI, has Null said anything about Section 230 lately?
He used to talk and write about it a lot during #DropKiwiFarms but I haven't listened to MATI in ages so I have no idea if he brought it up recently.

Null's favourite troon (that he was supposed to sue) is constantly BSing about Section 230 on BlueSky lately:

CaraballoSection230_01.jpg
CaraballoSection230.jpg
 
I'd say it's less of a targeted take over and more of a cultural exchange and sight seeing geg, I'd say Onionfarms has similar culture to the shlog and it would be cool to see the 2 be close
If visitors from Soyjack are interested in joining and can fit in, then I don't see any issue. We are a lot more chill than Josh.
 
6 litres? 6? For 20 years? And he's really short. He must be wider than he is tall. I mean... SIX! LITRES! You only need to drink roughly 2l of WATER a day. joshy has left out: Liver disease, gout, heart and kidney problems. (Last one means he prolly has the bladder of an 70yo woman). Oh... and erectile dysfunction.
 
Since you're still listening to MATI, has Null said anything about Section 230 lately?
He used to talk and write about it a lot during #DropKiwiFarms but I haven't listened to MATI in ages so I have no idea if he brought it up recently.

Null's favourite troon (that he was supposed to sue) is constantly BSing about Section 230 on BlueSky lately:

View attachment 86847View attachment 86848
I don't think liability protections will fully fade away from America as far as the Internet is concerned.

To me this seems like a push for that Digital Bill of Rights that Trump proposed during his election campaign where Trump's version of the Internet is basically Section 230 but discourages Big Tech from doing any censoring for legally protected speech, bans warrantless takedowns of Internet content by the government, and forcing all platforms operating in America to take down illegal content where if said platforms fulfill this criteria then they may still keep their liability protections.

I don't think Section 230 is going to fully go away and it will stay in some form or another but I think this may be taken to a back seat because Congress is still way too divided to do anything meaningful at the moment.

Although if Congress does want to go through with this, chances are Big Tech is going to interfere because Big Tech (and the rest of the Internet) loves Section 230.

So I imagine the tech companies and tech lobbyists will try to strike a deal with Congress that satisfies everyone.
 
I don't think liability protections will fully fade away from America as far as the Internet is concerned.

To me this seems like a push for that Digital Bill of Rights that Trump proposed during his election campaign where Trump's version of the Internet is basically Section 230 but discourages Big Tech from doing any censoring, bans warrantless takedowns of Internet content by the government, and forcing all platforms operating in America to take down illegal content where if said platforms fulfill this criteria then they may still keep their liability protections.

I don't think Section 230 is going to fully go away and it will stay in some form or another but I think this may be taken to a back seat because Congress is still way too divided to do anything meaningful at the moment.

Although if Congress does want to go through with this, chances are Big Tech is going to interfere because Big Tech (and the rest of the Internet) loves Section 230.

So I imagine the tech companies and tech lobbyists will try to strike a deal with Congress that satisfies everyone.

They'll try to make it so smaller sites like this very forum will always be at risk, but big tech will easily afford the new regulations and keep their Section 230 protections.

Section 230 also protects user generated content sites from having to worry about patchwork laws like obscenity where every state has their own law. I could see sites like Gelbooru having major issues if they have to worry about states like Idaho coming after them for content users post.
 
The "Autistic Cyberbully" title is the most adorable shit ever. They think that's a title that bites when really they wrote a joke that goes both ways.
 
Back
Top