No: Lowcowery is not white supremacy and never has been. It crosses all cultures
Please link Josh this message, he will lose it lol what a faggot, makes sense considering his lisping and female like behavior.Adult man on a children's forum.
View attachment 111005
An adult Josh Moon flirting with femboys.
View attachment 111006View attachment 111007View attachment 111008View attachment 111009
View attachment 111014
Last but not least...
View attachment 111010View attachment 111011
No, because 1) I think Vincent is just a happy go lucky DOTA playing kind of guy, not a free speech "psychopath" like Null, so he probably just wanted to get over with the appeal ASAP and would've agreed to anything LFJ demanded just to get it over with. Hell, if LFJ had asked Vincent to poke his stinkditch as part of their agreement he would've likely done that too just to get LFJ off his back. 2) it was still forum shopping and libel tourism that is not re-enforceable in the US. Whatever a foreign court based on their local laws has to say about 1A protected speech on an American forum doesn't matter in the US itself. That's literally what the SPEECH Act is for, to pre-empt the kind of forum-shopping and libel tourism that LFJ engaged in in Australia from being re-enacted in the US. If his KUSK lawyers were worth their salt, they would've warned him that getting a judgement against KF in Australia has irrelevant and wouldn't get him shit at a US court because of the SPEECH Act.Do you feel Vincent taking his default judgment back to court only to concede and admit in a legal document he facilitated defamation (while also paying her an undisclosed sum of money) somehow doesn't bolster LFJ's claim that she was defamed?
On the first Primo episode of the year, Jesse and Katie discuss the technologist Liz Fong-Jones and her battle against Kiwi Farms. Plus, a consent accident, a very online defamation suit, and an unsolicited email from an old friend.
https://www.blockedandreported.org/p/premium-liz-fong-jones-and-kiwi-farms
[–]onthewingsofangels 66 points 25 days ago
This is so disappointing.
I don't know Fong-Jones, but we overlapped at Google a lifetime ago. She was one of the employees leading the crusade against Google Plus's Real Names policy (remember that failed product?!), emphasizing the importance of anonymity on the Internet. The famous cartoon "on the Internet no one knows you're a dog" was held up as an ideal. Back then she understood that anonymity enabled free speech, and free speech was a key cornerstone of the Internet, and most critical for the most vulnerable.
To see her morphing from the old school tech idealist into this crusader for everything she once railed against is saddening.
BeABetterHumanBeing 13 points 24 days ago*
I'll keep it short, cause I don't want to spend like 40 mins typing it all out:
Damore put together his infamous memo. The gist, if you don't know, was that inside Google, like many big engineering companies, there was a big push to get more women involved, out of the misguided belief that if things aren't 50:50, that's a problem. Damore's memo basically said "look at all this research showing that men and women have different interests; I think this is probably a big factor nobody's considering". This was foolish of him, because even though he's right, everyone can see that the progressives behind this effort aren't amenable to reason, and this is just a third rail.
Damore goes and shops his draft memo around to various corners of the company, soliciting feedback. I was one of the first people who got a chance to read it, and saw several versions. Feedback was what I said above: this isn't going to make people happy, but you are right.
At some point, the company's progressive activist core [1] noticed this, and blew it up, making a big deal within the company. Management noticed, but their policy at that time was to basically ignore it and let it boil over, since the progressives were more or less always making a stink, and it was only a matter of time until something else came along to be the new thing.
Unhappy to see that management wasn't heeding their calls to have Damore publicly flogged, they leaked an earlier draft of the memo to the press (Buzzfeed, if my memory serves correctly). Because this was done in bad faith, they edited the memo first, mostly to remove graphs, citations, and other evidence so as to give the appearance that Damore was simply pulling stuff out of his ass, as opposed to this being carefully research, and evidence-backed.
Now that it was causing a national news cycle [2], management felt they had to do something. So they fired Damore for "causing strife among employees" (or some similar reasoning). Since he didn't leak it, they couldn't use that justification. Of course, the activists who spread the memo from being tentatively shared with a small group to plastering it on every wall? Were they punished? No, of course not.
So how am I so sure it's Fong-Jones? She was either the first or second to try blowing up the memo internally. She was the champion of calling for Damore's head. When the leak was published [3], Buzzfeed included interview commentary from her. Fong-Jones had spoken w/o company permission to the press repeatedly, and there were other leaked documents that also somehow came to be associated with her too [4].
I do sometimes wonder why HR didn't crack down on her. It's possible they sent warnings and she flagrantly ignored them. That said, HR was also the one pushing the 50:50 ratio being a goal-that's-never-explicitly-stated-because-that-would-actually-be-illegal. Having dealt with Google on several sensitive subjects, they were (at that time) very sensitive to be seen trying to shut down any conversations, and for any hot-button debate, they would have a preferred party they would silently root for. In this case, that party was the activists, up until the leak, and then they went and fired Damore to make it look (to the NYT-reading public) like they'd done something. If nobody had leaked it, they would've ignored it.
Okay, this did end up being 40 mins. Ah well.
PS - While typing this out, I thought of one other Fong-Jones anecdote. Somebody put together, presumably for whichever month is supposed to be for women's history, a big stylized posterboard with various notable female employees on it. Fong-Jones was on this list, because it was produced by some progressive sympathetic to the activists. The funny thing is that each person's picture had their name, and their notable accomplishment. Things like inventing new technologies, launching well-known products, and the like. What did Fong-Jones do to justify inclusion? She was labeled "SRE extraordinaire". A site reliability engineer (SRE) is just a job role. Do you really think that she was just so good at her job to deserve accolades from among the company's thousands of SREs? No, she was put there because the list-creator was a progressive who liked her activism, but knew that highlighting her habit of talking to the press w/o permission and causing a fuss internally wasn't something they should be announcing on a poster.
---
[1] I call them a "core" because they were organized, had their chat servers outside of the company, and so on. When they'd get on about something or other, they would coordinate things like posting / upvoting questions for the company all-hands, leaving comments and making memes to push the target agenda, and so on. On one delightful occasion, while I was parrying them in the internal listserv, they sent some rando to try distracting me with emails attempting to concern troll me. The funny bit is when I called him out for only being there to attempt to waste my time, he admitted to it. Like yo, if you're going to be a bad-faith actor, you got to commit to the lie!
[2] Google's employee training material tries dissuading people from making brash statements internally, asking menacingly how you would feel if it ended up on the front page of the New York Times. The problem with this strategy was that there were too many employees who would regard this as a badge of honor. I wanted to, but never got around to, suggest to HR that they update the guideline to be "NYT or Breitbart", so that the activists at least would think twice.
[3] For completeness, I will add that a copy of the memo was also leaked to Breitbart. I am 90% sure of who that is, but it's a name nobody would recognize because this individual feared for their career and never gave comments to the press. Why did they do it? Because they wanted a copy with the graphs / citations attached so that the public record would be complete.
[4] There's another story about an AI ethics board, but that's for another time.
So how am I so sure it's Fong-Jones? She was either the first or second to try blowing up the memo internally. She was the champion of calling for Damore's head. When the leak was published [3], Buzzfeed included interview commentary from her. Fong-Jones had spoken without company permission to the press repeatedly, and there wer other leaked documents that also somehow came to be associated with her too.[4]
So i read this document in full and i disagree with the characterization of it as a "smear dossier" given nothing in the document seems false. All 27 pages are dedicated to proving Kevin Crawley's identity as Mailfrawd and displaying his own beliefs in his own stated words. It's essentially a Kiwifarms thread in book/PDF format. In regards to "doxxing kids" (only revealing his first name), which Kiwifarms does, it was done to show further proof that Kevin is Mailfrawd. Mailfrawd posted on Kiwifarms he had a 11 year-old son. Doxing Kevin revealed he also had 11 year-old son. It's perfectly valid evidence. And the notion LFJ can't publish someone's address, which is legal under US law, because they have a family doesn't follow. I'm going to paraphrase something true Josh says: if you get doxed it's your own fault. Kevin flew too close to the sun trying to tar and feather LFJ. It backfired on him heavily. I can only hope he found the Reddit farms karma and "confirmed Kiwileak" title worth it in the end.
What made him this gay?Imagine chimping out at pensioners and not anyone who matters.
View attachment 111015
Mom's boyfriend(s). And mom too. His father doesn't seems to have had any issues with his other offspring.What made him this gay?
This is Josh's Chinese heritage (supposedly his federal agent dad was asian or something?) coming out. Pay his sadism no mind.Imagine chimping out at pensioners and not anyone who matters.
View attachment 111015
What? Candace managed to bag a Federal Agent at the airport Ramada?(supposedly his federal agent dad was asian or something?)
Wombat.socho
@wombat_socho
Link wrangler for
@patriarchtree
, gamer, otaku, writer, veteran. Chairman of
@SonOfSilvercon
. Acting head of Einwanderungsbehörde für Neu Schwabenland.
Tonopah, NV
Joined April 2022
ItsASmallGirl
@ItsASmallGirl
I'm weird. Also I make jokes. Don't be offended.
NHL/GoDucks | KC6TQR | Halloween is the best time.
United States
Joined March 2009
https://wireless2.fcc.gov › UlsApp › UlsSearch › license.jsp
ULS License - Amateur License - KC6TQR - HARRINGTON, VERONICA A
KC6TQR Radio Service HA - Amateur Status Active Auth Type Regular Dates Grant 06/15/2021 Expiration 07/16/2031 Effective 06/15/2021 Cancellation Licensee Information FRN 0005424684 Typ
look faggot, if she doesn't understand everything about the fat boy, then the trannies winGuys, please do not contact Veronica on X to ask her if she already knows about the Blockland posts, I do not condone that sort of thing. She probably already knows.
the dude gives good sloppy top. He's a real good bottom bitch



Josh is a retard, he's just screaming for someone to leak his DMs at some pointSo basically, the reason why Josh started grifting so hard and shamelessly is because Gabe Hoffman gave him permission.
Another point is that terms like "sloppy toppy" are too new for him to go "oh i learned about this from my 9chan days" like he actually has to be degenerate enough to learn those termsWould a straight person talk this way about another man?
Manually changing it to a gif fixed it for me.Would a straight person talk this way about another man?
View attachment 111079
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/domini...rbtfo-manlytears.25204/page-417#post-24187688https://archive.is/1qrlD
Triggered by a harmless anime ava (again).
View attachment 111081
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/eligib...or-military-draft.243192/page-3#post-24194282https://archive.ph/Ig1gr
The ava in question:
View attachment 111084
https://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/avatars/o/199/199756.jpg?1772229781It's not saving as a gif, idk why. It's a girl clapping with a fish flopping in the background.

Adult man on a children's forum.
View attachment 111005
An adult Josh Moon flirting with femboys.
View attachment 111006View attachment 111007View attachment 111008View attachment 111009
View attachment 111014
Last but not least...
View attachment 111010View attachment 111011
Josh or the femboys?I mean... He's a pretty girl tho![]()
Josh or the femboys?
Um, Gabe pretty much has been there at the beginning of KC.PPP is also in DM's with this guy Gabe Hoffman.