TheCIAGlowsInTheDark
An Onion Among Onions
Another thing to point out, Jersh being a radfem ironically he's also forgotten why former Internet communities like the Youtube Skeptics collapsed to begin with.
One of the big flaws with the anti-SJWs back in the day was that they criticized feminism but they made the fatal mistake of tolerating the misogynists, MRAs, and the proto-incels back then.
There's a lot of valid criticism against feminism during the Gamer Gate years but what people failed to do back then was the failure to gatekeep the crazies out of their anti-feminist circles. This gave the Online Left plenty of material to work with so they can trash on the Skpetics as well as trashing on gamers and right-wingers back in the day by using the dumbest anti-feminists they can find to discredit any anti-feminist arguments (like No Bullshit who was one of the dumbest anti-SJWs at the time).
Now and days both right-wingers and those that were from the Youtube Skeptic years have (for the most part) learned to make a clear criticisms against feminism without restoring to misogyny.
The best way to defeat feminism is to also show the ladies on why feminism is a bad deal for them too; feminism may give women the power to screw over men in divorce court and win a lot of money and the house from the man in the short run but in the long run this will cause more men to date less because no man wants to be falsely accused of being a rapist in the long run (there's now a woman loneliness epidemic because men are becoming more afraid to even talk to a woman out of fear of being labeled a rapist by some opportunistic harpy). So by showing the ladies on why and how feminism negatively effects women too will also make the ladies think twice about supporting policies that will also screw them in the end.
As for Vivek, if you're going to trash on Vivek then trash on him for what he represents for and not for who he is. Jersh uses the traditional Indian Caste system (a system of hierarchy heavily ingrained in Hinduism) to justify his racist views towards Vivek.
Yes, ancient India codified this oppressive system of hierarchy historically but there is one thing Jersh overlooks; the Indians are simply being honest here. Whites also oppressed their own people through slavery and made it harder for the Plebeian class to climb up the social ladder. The main difference between Indians and Whites is that the Indians are honest about establishing oppressive hierarchies while Whites historically made this an unspoken rule and often deny that they're being tyrants.
Nobody liked Mitt Romney back in the Obama years because he represented the out-of-touch politician that wanted to do nothing for the American people and he looked down on Americans with disdain. If Vivek Ramaswamy was white and Christian then all you would get is a Mitt Romney clone so Vivek's ethic background is irrelevant here.
As far as I know, no one made racist arguments against Mitt Romney for him being white back in the day and everyone criticized him for being an out-of-touch asshole when he ran against Obama. So if you're going to make fun of Vivek then trash on him for his bad policies and not for who he is (because there's plenty of white politicians that think exactly just like Vivek and what Vivek stands for has never been exclusive to the Hindu Caste System).
Also, I will never forgive Mitt Romney for running KB Toys into the ground.
