Spookful Shannel
An Onion Among Onions
So, Null and Lidl are the only two users who are permitted to give one word answers...
You don't need an inviation to join. You only need to have fun. If you can rock with us: You are one of us. Please note: Positions or opinions on this forum expressed belong solely to the individual and don't necessarily reflect official stances by Onionfarms.
So, Null and Lidl are the only two users who are permitted to give one word answers...
That's only a rule in the Thunderdome forums. Those were posted on the Grummz thread, as were these.So, Null and Lidl are the only two users who are permitted to give one word answers...


If Josh's nonprofit org was really about "saving teh innanet" then he would have gotten someone else with a sterling reputation to head it. Instead, he inserts himself at the helm so it is instantly destroyed from the get-go. As no one wants to do business with Josh Moon (for whatever reason); his reputation and trustworthiness is trashed and he is on some kind of bank blacklist. Josh also just copies his enemies like Keffals and LFJ. So if you want to predict Josh's next move, then see what LFJ has done over the past couple months. I think what most people are slowly starting to realize is that every Josh action is just him trying to get money but thinly-veiled as "free speech" or "saving teh innanet." Otherwise why would anyone care that some some fat sperg is debanked? That is an issue that will never affect 99.99% of normal people. So he smuggles other little things in there among the money stuff to make you invested yourself and think it's about other things besides money.why does josh think having a BIG BOY NONPROFIT will force banks to give him service? is he retarded? (don't answer that)
View attachment 87352
Grass?What's kind of funny is that Jersh and the weebs have a common enemy. If Jersh didn't burn his bridges with the weebs they might realize they have something in common.
josh thinks the former will fuck him and is terrified of the latterIt's crazy how many threads now get taken over by the Man-Hate Thread posters or the soyteens. Like every other thread has one or the other group show up in force to bully everyone else.
why does he need pro bono representation?
Both of these currently featured threads are being raided by both the soyteens and the Man-Haters.It's crazy how many threads now get taken over by the Man-Hate Thread posters or the soyteens. Like every other thread has one or the other group show up in force to bully everyone else.
Some lawyer wants to brown nose Josh and is giving him "free representation" in regards to OFCOM. For some reason he believes he doesn't need to abide by UK laws to be freely available in the UK when bigger websites and companies than Kiwifarms have abides by the law. The UK is going to wipe its ass with this letter.
Introduction to pro bono | The Law Society
This page gives a brief introduction to pro bono work for solicitors, how to find opportunities and why you should do it.www.lawsociety.org.uk
"Pro bono costs orders
Section 194 of the Legal Services Act 2007 provides for pro bono costs orders in civil courts, tribunals and settlement agreements. They are just like ordinary civil legal costs, but where a party was represented for free in relation to proceedings.
They require the losing party to pay costs to the Access to Justice Foundation, which uses these funds to support the provision of free legal help to those in need."
It seems, from what joshy said, the lawyer reached out to him. Maybe to try and scoop up the costs from whatever lolsuit joshy has in mind. If the guy isn't doing it for publicity (I'm not going with the "threat to safety" bit), then it's got to be money.

I've never liked Null personally, but have always wished him the best in his website-running hobby. This is really the last straw for me and got me to come over here and make an account. Here he is, someone who always warned about 'Fedposting' and 'touching the poo', has talked ad nauseum about hating 'political sperging', and has repeatedly said he hated A&H and wanted it gone from the site, posting in A&N about completely, unironically killing someone. And it is unironic because he has been posting for years about his issues with payment processors.
>Josh:"...don't capitalize on anything..."
It's funny and understandable yeah but he then goes and wonders why no one wants to do business with him. Ask yourself if this is the man who should be the public face of the movement for banks getting out of policing speech online.