If someone posted content from a "child modeling" (softcore CSAM) site that was US law compliant, what effect would it have on your opinion of the person posting content from a "child modeling" site?
Updates to Website
All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.
For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.Reminder: Personal Vendetta Threads (especially against staff) will be locked and thrown into the dumper.
Onionfarms.online is temporarily down.Topics of Interest
Does Legality = Morality?
- Thread starter Time 4 Guillotines
- Start date
-
- Tags
- i care about this
- Status
I'd think twice about keeping them around. Mr. Beast "Delaware" and all that. Oh and Mr. Beast and "Chris". Oh and @Cat Administrator and [censored name]. Oh and @Cat Administrator and [different censored name].
Especially if I had my full legal name in the branding of the site.
Especially if I had my full legal name in the branding of the site.
Autism Rulez
Remarkable Onion
I'd say if it's US law compliant it's not CSAM, but depends on the context of the post.
Any depiction of sexual activity (real or simulated) by minors is banned under federal law. The recordkeeping requirement is to help prevent this from happening.
Autism Rulez
Remarkable Onion
I meant the context of the post would determine my opinion.
No one but you is autistic enough to think this matters. It's real children being paraded in front of the camera for the purpose of providing material for pedos to jerk off to. It's softcore porn, they're not modeling clothes for a normal magazine or something.
Ken learned literally nothing from that. Apparently some dipshit whose posts are 75% flailing at Chase in the cartoon rabbit thread is worth airing a rerun
Then go bitch to the owner of the website if you have a problem.
Literally this. If he has a problem with the website he should do something about that site and not complain on a literally who gossip forum like a do nothing little crybaby bitch. He wants to virtue signal without doing anything himself because no one here likes him.
Also I don't care about this.
How about you get out of the way and let us discuss whatever we want instead of pedo defending?
The issue isn't the legality of the site, it's that this weirdo was clearly beating off to kids and is no trying to crybully his way to everyone being forced to stop talking about it
Ok, so co-sign Ken's statement that it's perfectly fine Kiwifails got caught browsing a child modeling site.
If you're saying anything I'm going to be against it because you cover for pedophiles like Blaine and Isaac. You're just trying to stir up drama because you're an attention whore ginger. You have no soul no job no money no house no family no friends no parents or grandparents no working genitals no hairline and no iq points.
Reason: Gingers are just pale red headed niggers.
No: Not when your intention is using this forum as your personal army against @kiwifails .Do it somewhere else.
The "personal vendetta" is based on him getting caught being a pedophile, numb nuts. It's so weird you've decided to step in on what would typically be a normal day on this forum. Is this a personal thing to you because you've had a prior "lapse of judgement" that lead you to browsing pedo, I mean child modeling sites?
You've become a pedo defender to own me? Epic take down, Rita. Typical tranny move but it's not normally the FtMs doing it
The only thing verified is you being a verified troublemaker.
One of your users was caught lurking a softcore CSAM site and you feel I'm being a troublemaker for wanting to discuss it? Why are you invested in wanting to shut it down? I could understand if this was Gays From LA since you adore his meth fueled essays about literal whos
I became a pedo defender to own you. Now I have to project that on others, smearing kiwifails is just overcompensating for defending Issac and Blaine. I will circumcise myself as an offering to Elaine who is a pedo defender and nonce herself.
- Status