Search results

No that is the fallacy. Which is a form of sophistry in of itself. You aren't determining if something is good or bad based on it's own merits but what "society" says. And that is ok with you? You do realize you hurt your own argument here...

It was victim-blaiming i.e. "It was their own damn fault". And called them "anti-social". Those were moral values. However I feel this distracts from the fact that the doxxing they do leads to harassment. Any other evidence anyone here can provide?

Thus it is the kiwi's business to get involved/spread it around? You guys seem to think "free access" = "our duty to bother them".

You know what I mean. Kiwi farms finds very obscure people and try to bring them to a wider audience...why? Why do that? You say "it's natural thus good" but that is fallacious reasoning.

Well, there you go then. Is there more collected. Because while they don't plan harassment on the site, the fact that it happens right afterwards is a big fucking correlation.

Except Kiwifarms goes out of it's way to "expose" these people who are on private forums or the like. Not exactly acting in public.

I should point out that it's none of Kiwifarms' business with what they do. After all they are the agressors, which means they can't handle it.

Well that said is there evidence here on this site of Kiwifarms encouraging harassement?

Wasn't Byuu a Japanense citizen at that point?

And how do you find death certificties then?

I was researching Kiwifarms and found this. Specifically I found this. It's just that there is so much to go through...

Like I am new to this drama and I have no interest in trawling through the farms because it is so dang big. What evidence was collected of Joshua Moon's and his site's crimes? MOD EDIT: the OP of this thread is Jacob S. Blaustein * https://archive.ph/m5tv8