I don't care enough to even do that TBH I just think the memes would be hilarious.
I say we full scale invade Mexico just to make Reddit cry.
Hanging out the doors of the helicopter, shootin beaners!
I don't care enough to even do that TBH I just think the memes would be hilarious.
Brown county invasion bingo card has a square filled in.
At least the USA most wanted list won't change much.
Something something avocado prices
Do trust them taco's to cooperate?No shit?
Apparently they are send them Guantanamo Bay..... So not to far offDid I have to say "concentration camps" for you to understand that that one was meant to be sarcastic?
Still a Apocalypse now 2 Taco tuesday will make for some good cinemaThe guys at the bottom of the food chain ARE.
The guys at the top of the food chain ARE NOT.
That's why we fuck with the tippy top. Soldiers tend to be either impotent or power hungry when you kill the commanders.
True it's still will be wildly unpopular much like Vietnam.We have more funds.
Depends the tacos seem to like war lords it's apocalypto over therePeacefully? That's the point I'm making. You just need to cause enough infighting and chaos for us to secure something good.
I am well aware of nationalism.
We really should have done that in the first place. Like a said like a Puerto Rico type solution.That's why they need Democracy
If their "elected government" worked for us, things would run smoother.
Agreed and they hate us and love China there governments are very Pro belt and roadSo do Saudis but look at the way their royalty blows us. It doesn't matter what the people think about us, what matters is what the people WHO CONTROL THEM think about us.
Once upon a Time in America is better.I'm not sure if that's the movie but you should watch sicario either way. It's ok. Can't vouch for part 2, I never saw it.
Do trust them taco's to cooperate?
Apparently they are send them Guantanamo Bay..... So not to far off
Still a Apocalypse now 2 Taco tuesday will make for some good cinema
True it's still will be wildly unpopular much like Vietnam.
Depends the tacos seem to like war lords it's apocalypto over there
We really should have done that in the first place. Like a said like a Puerto Rico type solution.
Agreed and they hate us and love China there governments are very Pro belt and road
Once upon a Time in America is better.
The cartels are already akin to Mehicano independent spec ops groups and operate from the special forces playbook. Militarily, an Afghanistan style invasion would mop the deck at first with an inevitable insurgency, but sending the delta farce or whatever bullshit is gonna be a 50/50 odds of them winning on each mission. The cartel's criminal mercenary groups are much more akin to special forces than an actual military or militia. There is no way this will end well, we're going to end up with atheist decked out taliban as our next door neighbor (yay our own Chechnya!!!) with an unsecurable border. Up until this point the cartels have avoided attacking U.S. citizens for this exact reason and now they'll have nothing to lose. Agent orange truly is trying to demolish this country.November 12, 2024 4:58PM
By Brandan P. Buck
SHARE
A perennial yet fanciful idea, the notion of sending US Special Forces into Mexico, has once again entered American political discourse. This latest flowering of foolishness emanated from President-elect Donald Trump’s future “Border Czar” Tom Homan, who, in a recent appearance on Fox News, declared that the incoming president “will use [the] full might of the United States Special Operations” to eliminate Mexico’s drug cartels.
While this idea is not new in Republican circles, it has become hazardous now given the Mexican drug cartels’ increased military capacity and tactical competence. Directing American Special Operations Forces against the cartels would put them up against a sizable near-peer competitor in asymmetric warfare, thus putting the US government into a position of little escalatory advantage. Such a move would not just force the American military into another quagmire; it would drop them into a morass up to their metaphorical waist.
These recent calls for the use of Special Operations Forces against the Mexican drug cartels ignore that the latter has developed capabilities perilously close to the former. Video evidence and Mexican officials have long revealed that the various cartels, particularly Los Zetas, the Sinaloa Cartel, and Jalisco Cartel New Generation (CJNG), possess the force-multiplying equipment of a formidable asymmetric military force. Examples include the possession of armored vehicles, the use of armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), man-portable heavy weapons systems, as well as the possession of surface-to-air missiles and numerous crew-served weapons.
Beyond equipment, the cartels, chiefly CJNG, have benefited from extensive tactical training, knowledge passed to them from Mexican military defectors, ironically enough, who were trained by US Special Operations forces.
Putting legalities and congressional consideration aside for a moment, sending US Special Operations into a direct confrontation with the Mexican cartels would pit them against a near-peer competitor, who, like the Taliban, would likely enjoy the direct or tacit support of the local populace and the luxury of hiding in punishing terrain.
cartel
Furthermore, as seen in more significant conflicts, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Middle East, man-portable weapons systems and armed UAVs favor those who hold territory, thereby leveling the scales between otherwise mismatched military forces. Given these constraints, in such a scenario American special operators would find themselves involved in an asymmetric war where combat parity would be all but guaranteed, thereby tempting the US government to escalate further.
In recent months, supporters of this idea have cited the US government’s near destruction of ISIS as proof of concept; however, making a model of the campaign against ISIS is a mistake. The issue at hand is not the combat prowess of the American military; it is the realities of government power and who wields the monopoly of coercion. In Syria and Iraq, the Assad regime, the Iraqi government, and their Iranian militia allies, all of whom share an opposition to ISIS, continue to wage their own campaigns against the group. These conditions do not apply to the situation in Mexico as the cartels are parastate actors that operate within the pockets of Mexico which lay beyond the authority of the central government.
If the US government uses its military power against cartel leadership, what guarantee will there be that their networks won’t regenerate as fast as they can be degraded? Furthermore, if even targeted strikes succeed over the long haul, who fills the power vacuums left in their wake? If the central Mexican state cannot do so, then the US will find itself in a situation different from the campaign against ISIS but more akin to Afghanistan, where they played whack-a-mole against the organization’s leadership and were unable to rectify the governing vacuum that sustained the group overall.
The further militarization of the drug war may score some political points, but it will not address the underlying causes of Mexico’s governance problem or stem the flow of drugs across the US southern border.
There is no doubt that the Mexican drug cartels are dangerous and depraved organizations whose command of the drug trade and other illicit activities has caused immeasurable suffering to the people of Mexico that is spilling over the border and into the United States. However, the solution to such issues cannot bear the risk of creating new sets of problems that would threaten further intervention.
You need to re-read his post.
Having a military capacity is only as good as the military you got the training from. And I understand that they use ruthless tactics and have unlimited money and can hide among regular people.
But ask the Iraqis how that worked out for them.
And ask Al-Qaeda how that worked out for them.
Better yet go ask isis how that worked out for them.
We could send the lame ass Army made up of trannys, faggots and morbidly obese kids we have now and they could plant a flag in Mexico City within a week. You're telling me special forces guys that are between 35 and 45 who've been doing this for like 20 years can't take out Pedro reading a latina donkey porn mag sitting near a 50 cal?
GETDEFUGGOUDDAHERE.
How the Jewish women who control the media think special forces going against the cartels will look like:
What the special forces going up against the cartels would ACTUALLY look like:
This is not an advantage, Vietnam and the middle east insurgents were kept away from America by half a world and an ocean. These guys could be blowing up shit in NYC and DC every day if they get pissed enough. They literally have their own submarine programs.home field advantage
The Taliban groups all did lol. These guys are too decentralized for decapitation strikes to work.What do you think they're going to set aside their differences after 60 years of killing each other to fight us?
This is a very good point, Mexico is really just an end point for most of the cartel operations. An operation to root them out would have to go all the way to northern Brazil.You're also forgetting that you have other countries supplying and aiding the narcos.
It's going to be extremely expensive and akin to playing whack-a-mole.The cartels are already akin to Mehicano independent spec ops groups and operate from the special forces playbook. Militarily, an Afghanistan style invasion would mop the deck at first with an inevitable insurgency, but sending the delta farce or whatever bullshit is gonna be a 50/50 odds of them winning on each mission.
Exactly, currently they're playing nice with us because they have no reason not to. But if we start kicking the beehive's nest, we're going to get stung by a swarm of them.The cartel's criminal mercenary groups are much more akin to special forces than an actual military or militia. There is no way this will end well, we're going to end up with atheist decked out taliban as our next door neighbor (yay our own Chechnya!!!) with an unsecurable border. Up until this point the cartels have avoided attacking U.S. citizens for this exact reason and now they'll have nothing to lose. Agent orange truly is trying to demolish this country.
These organizations emerged from the training provided in the 1980s, during the Iran-Contra scandal, when it was revealed that the School of the Americas was training counter-revolutionary insurgent 'freedom fighters'. This of course was a CIA backed operation.You need to re-read his post.
The Cartels have operations in all 50 states as far as I know.This is not an advantage, Vietnam and the middle east insurgents were kept away from America by half a world and an ocean. These guys could be blowing up shit in NYC and DC every day if they get pissed enough. They literally have their own submarine programs.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) – Mexican drug cartels are operating in Tennessee and every other state in the country, according to a report from the DEA.
The DEA’s map of cartel prevalence in every state shows Tennessee ranks in the middle of the pack, which didn’t surprise Jordan Breedlove, a narcotics agent with the 18th Judicial District Drug and Violent Crime Taskforce
It's one of the reasons the Taliban was able to hold their own for so long.The Taliban groups all did lol. These guys are too decentralized for decapitation strikes to work.
As far as Patagonia actuallyThis is a very good point, Mexico is really just an end point for most of the cartel operations. An operation to root them out would have to go all the way to northern Brazil.
https://www.reuters.com/article/wor...on-in-argentina-is-a-black-box-idUSKCN1PP0HQ/LAS LAJAS, Argentina - When China built a military-run space station in Argentina's Patagonian region it promised to include a visitors' center to explain the purpose of its powerful 16-story antenna.
The center is now built - behind the 8-foot barbed wire fence that surrounds the entire space station compound. Visits are by appointment only.https://www.reuters.com/article/world/chinas-military-run-space-station-in-argentina-is-a-black-box-idUSKCN1PP0HQ/
I wonder if "Machetes of Mexico" will be a banger or not.I don't care enough to even do that TBH I just think the memes would be hilarious.
Yes logisticallyCan't we just firebomb all of Mexico until they all die?
>This is a very good point, Mexico is really just an end point for most of the cartel operations. An operation to root them out would have to go all the way to northern Brazil. @HmmmmmYesTheFloorIsFloorHere
Adding onto this, can't we just firebomb all of Mexico and everything else on the way to Northern Brazil?
Yes logistically
Geopolitically no
Well they're already issuing predator drones to be usedBut I mean, like... Trump can't run for a 3rd term so he doesn't have to worry about reelection.
He should fire bomb them on the way out. For the goof.
Well they're already issuing predator drones to be used
WHO CARES WHAT THE REST OF THE WORLD THINKS?Yes logistically
Geopolitically no
WHO CARES WHAT THE REST OF THE WORLD THINKS?
Once we rape all of south America we can move to annex Mexico and set up satellite states elsewhere, I hope Canada join the U.S, The U.S needs to stretch from Alaska to Panama
You're not wrong, this is President Trump's official foreign policy.WHO CARES WHAT THE REST OF THE WORLD THINKS?
Coke is often cut with laxative IRLI mean the USA can always put laxatives in their coke.
Thus forcing them to drink the water which in turn would give them every disease known to man.
I mean that's kind of the point,I honestly thought this is just people kicking around scenarios and ideas.
In all honesty this is just like a "yea, but" back and forth conversation that I would be having with someone at a bar.