Updates to Website
All Races, Ethnic Groups, Religions, Gay or Straight, CIS or Trans: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.
For the time being register with Protonmail until I can check with G-Mail.Reminder: Personal Vendetta Threads (especially against staff) will be locked and thrown into the dumper.
Onionfarms.online is temporarily down.Topics of Interest
Cowsphere - KF Orbiter Lounge 96
- Thread starter Time 4 Guillotines
- Start date
Someone who is an orbiter of Kiwifarms and a central figure in the cowsphere.
Posting the same screenshots twice to show "context" sure seems like a great way to show context.
Now post the image you claim isn't CP.
I second this. He's been very open about sharing porn here so it'd be hella sus for him to suddenly be bashful. Oh, on the note, did you see the pic he posted that came from a site that got busted for distributing CSAM?
I know the image that was posted because I was the one who deleted it. It came from a modeling website that does indeed have models under the age of 18 years of age. What @kiwifails posted (the seminude model with the teddy bear) was in all likelihood someone who was 18 or over even though the background may have given the appearance of a somewhat "childlike setting". I don't know what else may have been posted on Gargamel's forum and I don't want to know.
Modeling websites that depict sexually explicit content are regulated by 18 USC section2257 which mandates recordkeeping and labeling requirements on adult performers who engage in sexually explicit content. It is legal for a site to use underage models if the content produced is not considered sexually explicit content (either real or simulated) and is exempt from recordkeeping requirements.
Thank you :)
Yeah Ken, dropping encyclopedic knowledge about CSAM laws is a great look. About as normal as knowing the age of consent laws by state.
Well, since it's always opposites day in Onionland, I'll tell you.
It's the same girl in the image you deleted, except the pose was significantly more suggestive and obviously designed to make her look as young as possible.
How damning.
So, essentially no different than those v-tuber anime avatars that (are designed to) look child-aged, that @kiwifails has spent so many words trying to make an argument that all viewers of such v-tubers are pedophiles.
In other words, since @kiwifails keeps images of this girl (which are designed to make her look child-aged) that makes @kiwifails a pedophile by @kiwifails' own definition.
Oh right, almost forgot this bit. She might actually be under 18, and @kiwifails keeps images of her, which leads to the same conclusion - @kiwifails is a pedophile.
I don't care about this.Modeling websites that depict sexually explicit content are regulated by 18 USC section2257 which mandates recordkeeping and labeling requirements on adult performers who engage in sexually explicit content. It is legal for a site to use underage models if the content produced is not considered sexually explicit content (either real or simulated) and is exempt from recordkeeping requirements.
You're very welcome, pedofails.
Keeping a known pedophile around is a great look.
He did it with Naught and Zrcarlo. Onion Farms is sex pest positive as long as you bitch about Josh and KF loudly enoughKeeping a known pedophile around is a great look
Incredibly. The fact Kiwifails thought he was remotely exonerated is shocking.
This is the second website you've posted porn from that also peddles in CSAM but it's fine because some autistic shit about ethics in record keeping or whatever.
Sort of funny you and your friend Shadfan both jerk off to galleries that contain children but you're only really looking at the goth/cat girls.
I'm actually looking forward to Garga's OP, I expect it will be revealing
Excuse me. I did not say the model was designed to look underage, I said the teddybear gave it somewhat of a childlike look. Having said this, I'm sure the website runs whatever content they produce by their
attorney.
attorney.
If you feel they are peddling illegal content than by all means report them to law enforcement.
Actually, the recordkeeping requirement is federal law and yes it is mandatory.
What better way to rebut your nonsense than with solid reference material.
No, you are not excused. The image posted to Lounge 96 is significantly more damning (and is free of any and all teddybears) than the image posted here.
I saw both images (you did not) and therefore I can make that statement.
I'm pretty sure that extremely sketchy site is a front for a pedophile ring anyway. You don't even have to have a lawyer when your site is fake.
I would think it over before throwing out those kinds of accusations concerning that site.
If the image is legal why did you delete it?
If the image is not legal then why did that site distribute it to @kiwifails?
What a batshit assumption to make about a site that distributes jerk off material featuring children
You sure seem invested in jumping into the conversation at an extremely bizarre juncture. Feeling guilty over a bookmark or what?
Also, another batshit statement.
>Um, ackshually I would reconsider your statement about this CSAM site before calling them pedos
Go to bed Ken, your brain is misfiring
Because our hosting provider in Panama frowns on underage modeling sites and I along with staff felt it was in the best interests of our community to delete it.