Null 🥝 Joshua Moon Megathread

[VAIDS Victim]

@VAIDS Victim you gotta explain that new "Jakked" emoji to me.

I'm not exactly sure the meaning but you mentioned soyjak, so I gave it to you.

 

[Ferengi of Romania]

It's so fucking cringe when Josh insults someone on his website and they respond with "oh im so sowwy im such a little autistic retarded faggot :(" or they agree with it so he doesn't get mad at them.

I can't imagine having such little self respect for myself.

I think you're missing the sarcasm in those replies.

 

[Obscenity2022]

View attachment 106313

yeah if its your kid, if a man or godforbid a tranny did this then Null would flip his fucking lid. he's suck a cuck for the female gender its insane

 

[TheCIAGlowsInTheDark]

The way I see it, this saga with Turkey Tom can end one of two ways:

1. The accusations are proven to be true (including the alleged rape incidents and the alleged revenge porn) and Turkey Tom could have his prison arc where he may go to prison for rape and revenge porn (this would in turn also make Turkey Tom become a registered sex offender should he be convicted). Even if no criminal charges are pressed against him then his online reputation is forever ruined and he can never show his face on the Internet ever again.

2. Turkey Tom in an ironic twist could have his own Pyrocrynical moment and he could show receipts that prove he didn't commit rape and he didn't created revenge porn against his ex-girlfriends where he ends up redeeming himself.

Either way it goes, it's just another day on the Internet.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

The way I see it, this saga with Turkey Tom can end one of two ways:

1. The accusations are proven to be true (including the alleged rape incidents and the alleged revenge porn) and Turkey Tom could have his prison arc where he may go to prison for rape and revenge porn (this would in turn also make Turkey Tom become a registered sex offender should he be convicted). Even if no criminal charges are pressed against him then his online reputation is forever ruined and he can never show his face on the Internet ever again.

2. Turkey Tom in an ironic twist could have his own Pyrocrynical moment and he could show receipts that prove he didn't commit rape and he didn't created revenge porn against his ex-girlfriends where he ends up redeeming himself.

Either way it goes, it's just another day on the Internet.

I listened to that podcast. And if Turkey Tom was able to prove these allegations false, imagine the lawsuit against kiwifarms.

 

[Youthful Shannel]

Does the Null interview have much Milk? I don't know much about Turkey Tom, but I find adults who dress like children creepy.

 

[TheRealist067]

imagine

"Josh interviewed two women making allegations, this is going to be the thing that sinks Kiwi Farms finally!"
Do you think you can file a slander suit against a person not making the allegations? Section 230 protects him from civil liability for what his users say, so what mental gymnastics are you doing in this creative writing exercise?

 

[Stuff (Ashley Sock)]

I listened to that podcast. And if Turkey Tom was able to prove these allegations false, imagine the lawsuit against kiwifarms.

Well you're 65 years old and your thread about this has had <10 replies in the last 24 hours, does your ex-wife have anything to say about "Turkey Tom"?

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Well you're 65 years old and your thread about this has had <10 replies in the last 24 hours, does your ex-wife have anything to say about "Turkey Tom"?

Why is this subject matter even relevant?

 

[TheRealist067]

Does the Null interview have much Milk

•Tom is into (((age play)))
•Tom is a rapist
•Tom can't cum unless he's looking at porn or the woman is in severe distress
•Tom would take video during sexual encounters, stop having sex and switch to beating off to the videos of the things that just happened
•Tom beats off with his legs up near his head like gay slut
•Destiny was wearing a buttplug while hanging out with Tom. Tom knows this because reasons
•Tom did coke with Dick Masterson (editorializing but he probably did the gay with Juju as well)
The funnier thing is watching every incel, sex pest and Null hater scramble to explain how deez hoes be lyin n sheeit and saying dumb shit like Josh is going to be sued for whatever delusional nonsense

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Does the Null interview have much Milk? I don't know much about Turkey Tom, but I find adults who dress like children creepy.

It's more like solid heavy cream.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

"Josh interviewed two women making allegations, this is going to be the thing that sinks Kiwi Farms finally!"
Do you think you can file a slander suit against a person not making the allegations? Section 230 protects him from civil liability for what his users say, so what mental gymnastics are you doing in this creative writing exercise?

You should never trust yourself as your own lawyer.

 

[TheRealist067]

>Be almost 70 years old
>Own a site dedicated to the sole objective of libeling another forum owner as a pedophile
>Fantasize about slander lawsuits
Wew lad

It's more like solid heavy cream.

Jealous you'll never do anything even a quarter as relevant as that interview?

You should never trust yourself as your own lawyer.

That doesn't answer my question but reminder that Josh's users like him enough to have paid for a lawyer for him. Do you think the people here (or anywhere) would do the same for you?

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

>Be almost 70 years old
>Own a site dedicated to the sole objective of libeling another forum owner as a pedophile
>Fantasize about slander lawsuits
Wew lad

Jealous you'll never do anything even a quarter as relevant as that interview?

That doesn't answer my question but reminder that Josh's users like him enough to have paid for a lawyer for him. Do you think the people here (or anywhere) would do the same for you?

That would depend on whether the forum is for fun or profit.

 

[The Gays From LA]

•Tom is into (((age play)))
•Tom is a rapist
•Tom can't cum unless he's looking at porn or the woman is in severe distress
•Tom would take video during sexual encounters, stop having sex and switch to beating off to the videos of the things that just happened
•Tom beats off with his legs up near his head like gay slut
•Destiny was wearing a buttplug while hanging out with Tom. Tom knows this because reasons
•Tom did coke with Dick Masterson (editorializing but he probably did the gay with Juju as well)
The funnier thing is watching every incel, sex pest and Null hater scramble to explain how deez hoes be lyin n sheeit and saying dumb shit like Josh is going to be sued for whatever delusional nonsense

My favourite part of this drama was all the people in the comment section of Turkey Tom's latest video saying he should revive his Tom Dark channel to do a video about Turkey Tom:

At one point, none other than Brittany Simon's ex-boyfriend Repzion showed up in the comments:

Repzion is live right now reacting to Null's interview with Turkey Tom's accusers:

 

[TheRealist067]

That would depend on whether the forum is for fun or profit.

Grok, does Section 230 offer the same protections against civil liability to a site that operates for profit as it does a site that does not receive user support?

Spoiler

Yes, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides the same protections against civil liability to for-profit websites as it does to non-profit ones or those that do not receive financial support from users. The statute's immunity provisions apply broadly to any "provider or user of an interactive computer service" without distinguishing based on the site's commercial status, funding model, or profitability. Courts have consistently applied these protections to a wide range of platforms, including major commercial entities like social media companies and classified ad sites, as long as they qualify as interactive computer services and the liability stems from third-party content.

Thank you Grok, you help prevent me from saying stupid shit

 

[Youthful Shannel]

Null hater

Oh, you're homosexual.

 

[ipreferpickles]

Grok, does Section 230 offer the same protections against civil liability to a site that operates for profit as it does a site that does not receive user support?

Spoiler

Yes, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides the same protections against civil liability to for-profit websites as it does to non-profit ones or those that do not receive financial support from users. The statute's immunity provisions apply broadly to any "provider or user of an interactive computer service" without distinguishing based on the site's commercial status, funding model, or profitability. Courts have consistently applied these protections to a wide range of platforms, including major commercial entities like social media companies and classified ad sites, as long as they qualify as interactive computer services and the liability stems from third-party content.

Thank you Grok, you help prevent me from saying stupid shit

Fuck off, Daniel.